Content deleted Content added
(34 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Electromechanical analog computer}}
[[Image:TDCfullview.jpg|thumb|right|U.S. Navy Mk III Torpedo Data Computer, the standard US Navy torpedo fire control computer during World War II. Later in World War II (1943),
The '''Torpedo Data Computer''' ('''TDC''') was an early [[electromechanical]] [[analog computer]] used for [[torpedo]] [[fire-control system|fire-control]] on [[US Navy|American]] [[submarine]]s during [[World War II]]. [[Royal Navy#1914–1945|Britain]], [[Kriegsmarine|Germany]], and [[Imperial Japanese Navy|Japan]] also developed automated torpedo fire control equipment, but none were as advanced as the [[US Navy]]'s TDC,<ref name=JapanGermany>{{cite book | last = Friedman | first = Norman | title = US Submarines Through 1945: An Illustrated Design History | year = 1995 | publisher = Naval Institute Press | isbn=1-55750-263-3 | pages = 195
▲[[Image:TDCfullview.jpg|thumb|right|U.S. Navy Mk III Torpedo Data Computer, the standard US Navy torpedo fire control computer during World War II. Later in World War II (1943), the TDC Mk III was replaced by the TDC Mk IV, which was an improved and larger version of the Mk III.]]
▲The '''Torpedo Data Computer''' ('''TDC''') was an early [[electromechanical]] [[analog computer]] used for [[torpedo]] [[fire-control system|fire-control]] on [[US Navy|American]] [[submarine]]s during [[World War II]]. [[Royal Navy#1914–1945|Britain]], [[Kriegsmarine|Germany]], and [[Imperial Japanese Navy|Japan]] also developed automated torpedo fire control equipment, but none were as advanced as the [[US Navy]]'s TDC,<ref name=JapanGermany>{{cite book | last = Friedman | first = Norman | title = US Submarines Through 1945: An Illustrated Design History | year = 1995 | publisher = Naval Institute Press | isbn=1-55750-263-3 | pages = 195 |ref=harv}}</ref> as it was able to automatically track the target rather than simply offering an instantaneous firing solution. This unique capability of the TDC set the standard for submarine torpedo [[Fire-control system|fire control]] during World War II.<ref name=computermuseum>{{cite web | title = Analog Computers | work = Lexikon's History of Computing | year = 1995 | url = http://www.computermuseum.li/Testpage/AnalogComputers.htm#Restoration | accessdate = 2006-07-03 | deadurl = yes | archiveurl = https://www.webcitation.org/69LF1Sr40?url=http://www.computermuseum.li/Testpage/AnalogComputers.htm#Restoration | archivedate = 2012-07-22 | df = }}
</ref><ref name=OtherTrackers>While the TDC's target tracking abilities were unique for submarine torpedo fire control during WWII, target tracking was used on surface ship torpedo fire control systems by a number of nations (see references in this article to [http://www.maritime.org/doc/destroyer/ddfc/index.htm US destroyer] and [http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/primary_documents/gvt_reports/USNAVY/USNTMJ%20Reports/USNTMJ-200F-0086-0124%20Report%20O-32.pdf Japanese torpedo fire control] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070720142332/http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/primary_documents/gvt_reports/USNAVY/USNTMJ%20Reports/USNTMJ-200F-0086-0124%20Report%20O-32.pdf |date=2007-07-20 }}). The TDC was the first analog computer to miniaturize the capability enough for deployment on a submarine.</ref>
Replacing the previously standard hand-held [[slide rule]]-type devices (known as the "banjo"
The TDC was a rather bulky addition to the sub's [[conning tower]] and required two extra crewmen: one as an expert in its maintenance, the other as its actual operator. Despite these drawbacks, the use of the TDC was an important factor in the successful [[commerce raiding]] program conducted by American submarines during the [[Pacific
Two [[Greater Underwater Propulsion Power Program|upgraded]] World War II-era U.S. Navy fleet submarines ({{USS|Tusk|SS-426|6}} and {{USS|Cutlass|SS-478|2}}) with their TDCs continue to serve with [[Taiwan Navy|Taiwan's navy]] and [[San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park|U.S. Nautical Museum]] staff are assisting them with maintaining their equipment.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.maritime.org/taiwan/index.htm|title=Museum documents an operating US, WW II built submarine in Taiwan.|
==Background==
===History===
The problem of aiming a [[torpedo]] has occupied military engineers since [[Robert Whitehead (engineer)|Robert Whitehead]] developed the modern torpedo in the 1860s. These early torpedoes ran at a preset depth on a straight course (consequently they are frequently referred to as "straight runners"). This was the state of the art in torpedo guidance until the development of the [[homing torpedo]] during the latter part of [[World War II]].<ref name=othertorps>There were other forms of torpedo guidance attempted throughout WWII. Notable are the Japanese human-guided ''[[Kaiten]]'' and German [[G7e#G7e/T3|pattern running]] and [[acoustic homing]] types for attacking convoys. Today, most submarine-launched torpedoes are wire-guided with terminal homing.</ref> The vast majority of submarine torpedoes during World War II were straight running, and these continued in use for many years after World War II.<ref name=USMk14his>{{cite web|url = http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1592/ustorp5.htm|title= Part Five: Post WW-II Submarine Launched/ Heavyweight Torpedoes|
During [[World War I]], computing a target intercept course for a torpedo was a manual process where the fire control party was aided by various [[slide rule]]s<ref name=fleetsub>{{cite web | title = Torpedo Data Computer | work = FleetSubmarine.com | year = 2002 | url = http://www.maritime.org/tdc.htm |
|
During World War II, Germany,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.msichicago.org/exhibit/U505/virtualtour/photo_tour/contower.html |title=
In 1932, the [[Bureau of Ordnance]] (BuOrd) initiated development of the TDC with [[Arma Corporation]] and [[Ford Instruments]].<ref name="Holwitt, p.147">Holwitt, p.147.</ref> This culminated in the "very complicated" Mark 1 in 1938.<ref name="Holwitt, p.147"/> This was retrofitted into older boats, beginning with
The first submarine designed to use the TDC was {{USS|Tambor|SS-198|2}},<ref name=Tambor>{{cite web | last = Mohl | first = Michael | title = Tambor (SS-198) |
In 1943, the Torpedo Data Computer Mark IV was developed to support the [[Mark 18 torpedo|Mark 18]] torpedo.<ref name=Mk18>The Mark 18 was electric and therefore wakeless and difficult for surface forces to trace. On the downside, it was slower than the Mark 14. This made it more difficult to aim accurately because larger gyro angles were involved. Even so, thousands of them were fired during WWII.</ref><ref name=clearMk18>{{harvnb|O'Kane|1977|p=221}}</ref>
Both the Mk III and Mk IV TDC were developed by [[Arma Engineering Company|Arma Corporation]] (now American Bosch Arma).
===The problem of aiming a straight-running torpedo===
[[Image:FiringGeometry.png
A straight-running torpedo has a [[gyroscope]]-based control system that ensures that the torpedo will run a straight course.<ref name="straight">Straight after an initial turn to course, as explained below.</ref> The torpedo can run on a course different from that of the submarine by adjusting a parameter called the gyro angle, which sets the course of the torpedo relative to the course of the submarine (see Figure 2). The primary role of the TDC is to determine the gyro angle setting required to ensure that the torpedo will strike the target.
Determining the gyro angle required the real-time solution of a complex [[Trigonometry|trigonometric]] equation (see [[Torpedo Data Computer#math 1|Equation 1]] for a simplified example). The TDC provided a continuous solution to this equation using data updates from the submarine's navigation sensors and the TDC's target tracker. The TDC was also able to automatically update all torpedo gyro angle settings simultaneously with a fire control solution, which improved the accuracy over systems that required manual updating of the torpedo's course.<ref name=AutomatedGyroSetting>{{harvnb|Friedman|1995|p=196}}</ref>
The TDC enables the submarine to launch the torpedo on a course different from that of the submarine, which is important tactically. Otherwise, the submarine would need to be pointed at the projected intercept point in order to launch a torpedo.<ref name="GyroPointing">Torpedoes were developed by the United States with this capability during WWI. However, without automated fire control it was difficult to realize the full advantages of this approach.</ref> Requiring the entire vessel to be pointed in order to launch a torpedo would be time consuming, require precise submarine course control, and would needlessly complicate the torpedo firing process. The TDC with target tracking gives the submarine the ability to maneuver independently of the required target intercept course for the torpedo.
As is shown in Figure 2, in general, the torpedo does not actually move in a straight path immediately after launch and it does not instantly accelerate to full speed, which are referred to as torpedo ballistic characteristics. The ballistic characteristics are described by three parameters: reach, turning radius, and corrected torpedo speed. Also, the target bearing angle is different from the point of view of the periscope versus the point of view of the torpedo, which is referred to as torpedo tube parallax.<ref name = parallax>{{cite book |editor=Commander Submarine Force, United States Atlantic Fleet |title=Submarine Torpedo Fire Control Manual |
Straight running torpedoes were usually launched in salvo (i.e. multiple launches in a short period of time)<ref name="spread">{{harvnb|COMSUBATL|1950|loc=
Salvos and spreads were also launched to strike tough targets multiple times to ensure their destruction.<ref name = doctrine>{{cite book | title = Current Submarine Doctrine | editor = Commander Submarine Force, Pacific Fleet |
[[Image:
To accurately compute the gyro angle for a torpedo in a general engagement scenario, the target course, speed, range, and bearing must be accurately known. During World War II, target course, range, and bearing estimates often had to be generated using periscope observations, which were highly subjective and error prone. The TDC was used to refine the estimates of the target's course, range, and bearing through a process of
Line 50:
*comparing the predicted position against the actual position and correcting the estimated parameters as required to achieve agreement between the predictions and observation. Agreement between prediction and observation means that the target course, speed, and range estimates are accurate.
Estimating the target's course was generally considered the most difficult of the observation tasks. The accuracy of the result was highly dependent on the experience of the skipper. During combat, the actual course of the target was not usually determined but instead the skippers determined a related quantity called "[[angle on the bow]]." Angle on the bow is the angle formed by the target course and the line of sight to the submarine. Some skippers, like
To generate target position data versus time, the TDC needed to solve the equations of motion for the target relative to the submarine. The equations of motion are differential equations and the TDC used mechanical integrators to generate its solution.<ref name=CBC>{{cite web | last = Bromley | first = Allan | title = Analog Computing Devices | work = Computing Before Computers | year = 1990 | url = http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/CBC.html |
The TDC needed to be positioned near other [[fire-control system|fire control]] equipment to minimize the amount of electromechanical interconnect. Because submarine space within the pressure hull was limited, the TDC needed to be as small as possible. On World War II submarines, the TDC and other fire control equipment was mounted in the [[conning tower]], which was a very small space.<ref name=silent>{{cite video | people = Wise, Robert (Director-One scene shows how cramped a conning tower could be.) |date = 1958 | title = Run Silent, Run Deep | medium = Film | ___location = Pacific Ocean}}</ref>
The packaging problem was severe and the performance of some early torpedo fire control equipment was hampered by the need to make it small.<ref name=USSubHis>{{harvnb|Friedman|1995|p=350}}</ref> It had an array of handcranks, dials, and switches for data input and display.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.fleetsubmarine.com/tdc.html|title = Torpedo Data Computer|date = November 2015|access-date = 2006-07-29|archive-date = 2011-02-26|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110226082027/http://www.fleetsubmarine.com/tdc.html|url-status = dead}}</ref> To generate a fire control solution, it required inputs on
*submarine course and speed, which were read automatically from the submarine's [[gyrocompass]] and [[pitometer log]]
*estimated target course, speed, and range information (obtained using data from the submarine's [[periscope]], [[Target Bearing Transmitter]] (TBT),<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bowfin.org/website/bowfin/bowfin_systems/TBT/tbt.htm |title=
*torpedo type and speed (type was needed to deal with the different torpedo ballistics)<!--This was accounted for by changing cams in the machine, but can't recall if the source is Blair, Grider, O'Kane, or Beach...or somewhere else...-->
Line 65:
===TDC functional description===
Since the TDC
*Angle solver: This computer calculates the required gyro angle. The TDC had separate angle solvers for the forward and aft torpedo tubes.
*Position keeper: This computer generates a continuously updated estimate of the target position based on earlier target position measurements.<ref name = positionkeeper>{{harvnb|COMSUBATL|1950|loc=
====Angle solver====
Line 78:
*The torpedo moves on a fixed course and speed
[[Image:Intercept.svg
As can be seen in Figure 2, these assumptions are not true in general because of the torpedo ballistic characteristics and torpedo tube parallax. Providing the details as to how to correct the torpedo gyro angle calculation for ballistics and parallax is complicated and beyond the scope of this article. Most discussions of gyro angle determination take the simpler approach of using Figure 3, which is called the torpedo fire control triangle.<ref name="clear"/><ref name = "wahoo"/> Figure 3 provides an accurate model for computing the gyro angle when the gyro angle is small, usually less than 30°.<ref name = SmallGyro>{{harvnb|COMSUBATL|1950|loc=
The effects of parallax and ballistics are minimal for small gyro angle launches because the course deviations they cause are usually small enough to be ignorable. U.S. submarines during World War II preferred to fire their torpedoes at small gyro angles because the TDC's fire control solutions were most accurate for small angles.<ref name = Doctrine>{{cite book | editor = Commander Submarine Force, Pacific Fleet | title = Current Submarine Doctrine |
The problem of computing the gyro angle setting is a trigonometry problem that is simplified by first considering the calculation of the deflection angle, which ignores torpedo ballistics and parallax.<ref name = Deflection>{{harvnb|COMSUBATL|1950|loc=
For small gyro angles, {{math|''θ''<sub>Gyro</sub> ≈ ''θ''<sub>Bearing</sub> − ''θ''<sub>Deflection</sub>}}. A direct application of the [[law of sines]] to Figure 3 produces Equation {{EquationNote|1}}.
{{NumBlk|:|<math>\frac{\left \Vert v_{\mathrm{Target}} \right \| }{ \sin(\theta_{\mathrm{Deflection}}) } = \frac{\left \Vert v_{\mathrm{Torpedo}} \right \| }{ \sin(\theta_{\mathrm{Bow}}) } </math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}}
Line 93:
:{{math|''θ''<sub>Deflection</sub>}} is the angle of the torpedo course relative to the periscope line of sight.
Range plays no role in Equation {{EquationNote|1}}, which is true as long as the three assumptions are met. In fact, Equation {{EquationNote|1}} is the same equation solved by the mechanical sights of [https://web.archive.org/web/20060902191228/http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/h41000/h41761.jpg steerable torpedo tubes] used on surface ships during World War I and World War II. Torpedo launches from steerable torpedo tubes meet the three stated assumptions well. However, an accurate torpedo launch from a submarine requires parallax and torpedo ballistic corrections when gyro angles are large. These corrections require knowing range accurately. When the target range was not known, torpedo launches requiring large gyro angles were not recommended.<ref name = AccurateRange>{{harvnb|COMSUBATL|1950|loc=
Equation {{EquationNote|1}} is frequently modified to substitute track angle for deflection angle (track angle is defined in Figure 2, {{math|1=''θ''<sub>Track</sub>=''θ''<sub>Bow</sub>+''θ''<sub>Deflection</sub>}}). This modification is illustrated with Equation {{EquationNote|2}}.
Line 100:
{{math|''θ''<sub>Track</sub>}} is the angle between the target ship's course and the torpedo's course.
[[Image:DeflectionAngle.png
A number of publications<ref name = OptimumTrackAngle>{{harvnb|COMSUBATL|1950|loc=
The curves show the solutions of Equation {{EquationNote|2}} for deflection angle as a function of target speed and track angle. Figure 4 confirms that 110° is the optimum track angle for a {{convert|16|kn|km/h|0|sing=on}} target, which would be a common ship speed.<ref name = TargetSpeed>
{{harvnb|COMSUBATL|1950|loc=
====Position keeper====
As with the angle solver, the equations implemented in the
==Notes and references==
Line 116 ⟶ 114:
==External links==
*[http://www.maritime.org/tdc.htm USS Pampanito: Article on the Pampanito's TDC.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120717035001/http://maritime.org/tech/tdc.htm |date=2012-07-17 }}
*[http://www.usscod.org/tdc.html Torpedo Data Computer Mk IV]
*[http://web.mit.edu/STS.035/www/PDFs/Newell.pdf A. Ben Clymer: ''The mechanical analog Computers of Hannibal Ford and William Newell''], IEEE Annals of the history of computing
*[http://www.bergall.org/320/patrol/torpedo.html US Torpedo History: Good description of operational use of the Mk 14, Mk 18, and Mk 23]
*[http://www.maritime.org/doc/tdc/index.htm Original Manual for the ''Torpedo Data Computer Mark 3'']
*{{cite book |author=Bureau of Ordnance |title=Tactical Data for Torpedoes Mark XIV &
*{{cite book |author=Bureau of Ordnance |title=Tactical Data for Torpedo Mark 18 |publisher=Navy Department |___location=Washington D.C. |series=Ordnance Data Pamphlet |id=O.D. No. 6697 Change 2 |date=10 August 1954 |url=https://maritime.org/doc/pdf/torp-mk18-tactical.pdf}}
*[http://home.comcast.net/~mbiegert/Work/HistOfTech/TDC/Model.htm Discussion of the torpedo ballistic and parallax corrections used by the Imperial Japanese Navy]
*[http://tvre.org/en/torpedo-calculator-t-vh-re-s3 Description of German Torpedo Calculator ''T.Vh.Re.S3'' developed by Siemens and used on German U-Boats during World War II]
{{Naval combat systems}}
[[Category:Submarine components]]
[[Category:Military computers]]
[[Category:Analog computers]]
[[Category:Electro-mechanical computers]]
[[Category:Fire-control computers of World War II]]
[[Category:Military equipment introduced in the 1930s]]
|