Content deleted Content added
Restored revision 1021482288 by 148.64.113.168 (talk): Same spam, new account |
No edit summary |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Database management system}}
In the field of database design, a '''multi-model database''' is a [[Database management systems|database management system]] designed to support multiple [[Database model|data models]] against a single, integrated backend. In contrast, most database management systems are organized around a single data model that determines how data can be organized, stored, and manipulated.<ref name="neither">[http://blogs.the451group.com/information_management/2013/02/08/neither-fish-nor-fowl/ The 451 Group, "Neither Fish Nor Fowl: The Rise of Multi-Model Databases"]</ref> [[document-oriented database|Document]], [[graph database|graph]], [[relational database|relational]], and [[
== Background ==
The [[relational model|relational]] data model became popular after its publication by [[Edgar F. Codd]] in 1970. Due to increasing requirements for [[Scalability#Horizontal and vertical scaling|horizontal scalability]] and [[fault tolerance]], [[NoSQL]] databases became prominent after 2009. NoSQL databases use a variety of data models, with [[Document-oriented database|document]], [[Graph database|graph]], and key–value models being popular.<ref name="rise">[http://www.infoworld.com/article/2861579/database/the-rise-of-the-multimodel-database.html Infoworld, "The Rise of the Multi-Model Database"]</ref>
A
For some time,{{vague|date=April 2024}} it was all but forgotten (or considered irrelevant) that there were any other database models besides
The first time the word "multi-model" has been associated to the databases was on May 30, 2012 in Cologne, Germany, during the [[Luca Garulli]]'s key note "''NoSQL Adoption – What’s the Next Step?''".<ref>{{Cite web|date=2012-06-01|title=Multi-Model storage 1/2 one product|url=http://www.slideshare.net/lvca/no-sql-matters2012keynote/47-MultiModel_storage_12_one_product}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://2012.nosql-matters.org/cgn/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/KeyNote-Luca-Garulli.pdf|title=Nosql Matters Conference 2012 {{!}} NoSQL Matters CGN 2012|website=2012.nosql-matters.org|access-date=2017-01-12}}</ref> Luca Garulli envisioned the evolution of the 1st generation NoSQL products into new products with more features able to be used by multiple use cases.
The idea of multi-model databases can be traced back to [[object–relational database|Object–Relational Data Management Systems (ORDBMS)]] in the early 1990s and in a more broader scope even to [[federated DBMS|federated]] and [[integrated
Multi-model databases are intended to offer the data modeling advantages of polyglot persistence,<ref name="polyglot"/> without its disadvantages. Operational complexity, in particular, is reduced through the use of a single data store.<ref name="rise"/>
== Databases ==▼
== Benchmarking multi-model databases ==
As more and more platforms are proposed to deal with multi-model data, there are a few works on benchmarking multi-model databases. For instance, [[Ewa Pluciennik|Pluciennik]],<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ewa Pluciennik and Kamil Zgorzalek|title=The Multi-model Databases - A Review|journal=Bdas 2017|pages=141–152}}</ref> [[Fábio Roberto Oliveira|Oliveira]],<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Fábio Roberto Oliveira, Luis del Val Cura|title=Performance Evaluation of NoSQL Multi-Model Data Stores in Polyglot Persistence Applications|journal=Ideas '16|pages=230–235}}</ref> and [[UniBench]]<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Chao Zhang, Jiaheng Lu, Pengfei Xu, Yuxing Chen|title=UniBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Model Database Management Systems|url=https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/jilu/documents/UniBench.pdf|journal=TPCTC 2018}}</ref> reviewed existing multi-model databases and made an evaluation effort towards comparing multi-model databases and other SQL and NoSQL databases respectively. They pointed out that the advantages of multi-model databases over single-model databases are as follows :
== Architecture ==
Line 42 ⟶ 23:
== User-defined data models ==
In addition to offering multiple data models in a single data store, some databases allow developers to easily define custom data models. This capability is enabled by ACID transactions with high performance and scalability. In order for a custom data model to support concurrent updates, the database must be able to synchronize updates across multiple keys. ACID transactions, if they are sufficiently performant, allow such synchronization.<ref name="multiple">[http://www.odbms.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Multiple-Data-Models.pdf ODBMS, "Polyglot Persistence or Multiple Data Models?"]</ref> JSON documents, graphs, and relational tables can all be implemented in a manner that inherits the horizontal scalability and fault-tolerance of the underlying data store.
== Theoretical Foundation for Multi-Model Databases ==
The traditional theory of relations is not enough to accurately describe multi-model database systems. Recent research <ref name="CT">[https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol14/p2663-uotila.pdf MultiCategory: Multi-model Query Processing Meets Category Theory and Functional Programming ]</ref> is focused on developing a new theoretical foundation for these systems. [[Category theory]] can provide a unified, rigorous language for modeling, integrating, and transforming different data models. By representing multi-model data as sets and their relationships as functions or relations within the Set category, we can create a formal framework to describe, manipulate, and understand various data models and how they interact.
== See also ==
Line 68 ⟶ 55:
* [http://www.odbms.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Multiple-Data-Models.pdf ODBMS, "Polyglot Persistence or Multiple Data Models?"]
* [http://www.infoworld.com/article/2861579/database/the-rise-of-the-multimodel-database.html Infoworld, "The Rise of the Multi-Model Database"]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Multi-model Database}}
Line 80 ⟶ 69:
[[Category:Data analysis]]
[[Category:Big data]]
[[Category:Database management systems]]
|