Revision as of 15:07, 28 July 2025 edit Genome42 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,308 edits →Delete this article: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 19:00, 28 July 2025 edit undo VolatileAnomaly (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Temporary account IP viewers 6,750 edits →Delete this article: Reply Tag: Reply
Line 30: ::::::This is why we have so many papers in the scientific literature proclaiming to have discovered some new functional DNA element in non-coding DNA as though that's a revolutionary thought. ::::::We could just as easily divide the genome into centromeres and non-centromeres and write an article on conserved non-centromeric DNA as if that was something worthwhile. [[User:Genome42\|Genome42]] ([[User talk:Genome42\|talk]]) 15:07, 28 July 2025 (UTC) :::::::I'm going off your comment that "there should be an article on CNEs" here. So yes, I'm agreeing that we remove the redundant info on Introns and untranslated regions and expand the section on ultraconserved sequences, with the idea of ultimately improving this article to host comprehensive coverage on CNEs (with a rename if needed). — [[User:VolatileAnomaly\|<b style="background-color:black;border:3px solid gray;padding:3px;color:lime;">🪫Volatile</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:VolatileAnomaly\|''' 📲T''']] \| [[Special:Contributions/VolatileAnomaly\|'''⌨️C''']]</sup> 19:00, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Conserved non-coding sequence: Difference between revisions