Content deleted Content added
→Usage: neutralize 3-sentence claim |
m →Notes: MOS:LQ + MOS:QWQ + MOS:CONFORM, MOS:QUOTEPUNCT |
||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Beliefs about the use of the English language considered by others as wrong}}
[[File:Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Text.jpg|thumb|Text from [[Robert Louis Stevenson]]'s ''[[Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde]]'' featuring one-sentence paragraphs
This list comprises widespread modern beliefs about [[English language|English]] [[usage (language)|language usage]] that are documented by a reliable source to be misconceptions.
With no authoritative [[language academy]], [[linguistic prescription|guidance]] on English language usage can come from many sources. This can create problems, as described by Reginald Close: <blockquote>Teachers and textbook writers often '''invent''' rules which their students and readers repeat and perpetuate. These rules are usually statements about English usage which the authors imagine to be, ''as a rule'', true. But statements of this kind are extremely difficult to formulate both simply and accurately. They are rarely altogether true; often only partially true; sometimes contradicted by usage itself. Sometimes the contrary to them is also true.<ref>[[#Clo64|Close 1964]]. n.p. (Front matter.) In a footnote to this text, Close also points to ''English as a Foreign Language'' by R. A. Close (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1962).</ref></blockquote>
Many [[usage]] forms are commonly perceived as [[nonstandard dialect|nonstandard]] or [[error (linguistics)|errors]] despite being either widely
Perceived violations of correct English usage elicit visceral reactions in many people, or may lead to a perception of a writer as careless, uneducated, or lacking attention to detail. For example, respondents to a 1986 [[BBC]] poll were asked to submit "the three points of grammatical usage they most disliked". Participants
▲Perceived violations of correct English usage elicit visceral reactions in many people. For example, respondents to a 1986 [[BBC]] poll were asked to submit "the three points of grammatical usage they most disliked". Participants stated that their noted points "'made their blood boil', 'gave a pain to their ear', 'made them shudder', and 'appalled' them".<ref>Jenny Cheshire, "Myth 14: Double Negatives are Illogical" in [[#Bau98|Bauer and Trudgill 1998]]. pp. 113–114.</ref>
==Grammar==
* '''Misconception:''' ''"A sentence must not end in a [[preposition]]."''<ref name="Cutts 2009. p. 109">[[#Cut09|Cutts 2009]]. p. 109.</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">[[#CK09|O'Conner and Kellerman 2009]]. p. 21.</ref><ref name="ReferenceB">[[#Fog10|Fogarty 2010]]. "Top Ten Grammar Myths".</ref>
'''Misconception:''' ''A sentence must not end in a [[preposition]].''<ref name="Cutts 2009. p. 109">[[#Cut09|Cutts 2009]]. p. 109.</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">[[#CK09|O'Conner and Kellerman 2009]]. p. 21.</ref><ref name="ReferenceB">[[#Fog10|Fogarty 2010]]. "Top Ten Grammar Myths."</ref> [[Mignon Fogarty]] ("Grammar Girl") says, "nearly all grammarians agree that it's fine to end sentences with prepositions, at least in some cases."<ref>[[#Fog10|Fogarty 2011]]. pp. 45–46.</ref> ''[[Fowler's|Fowler's Modern English Usage]]'' says, "One of the most persistent myths about prepositions in English is that they properly belong before the word or words they govern and should not be placed at the end of a clause or sentence."<ref>[[#Bur96|Burchfield 1996]]. p. 617.</ref> [[Preposition stranding]] was in use long before any English speakers [[disputes in English grammar#Examples|considered it incorrect]]. This idea probably began in the 17th century, owing to an essay by the poet [[John Dryden]], and it is still taught in schools at the beginning of the 21st century.<ref name="Cutts 2009. p. 109"/> However, "every major grammarian for more than a century has tried to debunk" this idea; "it's perfectly natural to put a preposition at the end of a sentence, and it has been since Anglo-Saxon times."<ref>[[#CK09|O'Conner and Kellerman 2009]]. p. 22.</ref> "Great literature from Chaucer to Milton to Shakespeare to the King James version of the Bible was full of so called terminal prepositions."<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Other grammarians have supported the practice by analogy with Latin, such as [[Robert Lowth]] in his 1762 textbook ''A Short Introduction to English Grammar''. The saying "This is the sort of nonsense up with which I will not put", apocryphally attributed to [[Winston Churchill]],<ref>{{cite web |url= http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001715.html |title= A misattribution no longer to be put up with |date= 12 December 2004 |work= Language Log |access-date=29 May 2013}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceA"/>{{Ref label|B|b|none}} satirizes the awkwardness that can result from prohibiting sentence-ending prepositions.▼
▲
'''Misconception:''' ''[[Infinitives]] must not be [[Split infinitive|split]].'' "There is no such rule" against splitting an infinitive, according to ''The Oxford Guide to Plain English'',<ref name="Cutts 2009. p. 111">[[#Cut09|Cutts 2009]]. p. 111.</ref> and it has "never been wrong to 'split' an infinitive".<ref>[[#CK09|O'Conner and Kellerman 2009]]. p. 17.</ref> In some cases it may be preferable to split an infinitive.<ref name="Cutts 2009. p. 111" /><ref>[[#CK09|O'Conner and Kellerman 2009]]. pp. 18–20.</ref> According to Phillip Howard, the "grammatical 'rule' that most people retain from their schooldays is the one about not splitting infinitives", and it is a "great [[Shibboleth]] of English syntax".<ref>[[#How84|Howard 1984]]. p. 130.</ref> According to the [[University of Chicago]] Writing Program, "Professional linguists have been snickering at it for decades, yet children are still taught this false 'rule'."<ref>[[#Uni00|University of Chicago Writing Program]].</ref> In his grammar book ''A Plea for the Queen's English'' (1864), [[Henry Alford]] claimed that because "to" was part of the infinitive, the parts were inseparable.<ref>[[#CK09|O'Conner and Kellerman 2009]]. p. 19.</ref> This was in line with a 19th-century movement among grammarians to transfer Latin rules to the English language. In Latin, infinitives are single words (e.g., "''amare, cantare, audire''"), making split infinitives impossible.<ref name="Cutts 2009. p. 111"/>▼
* '''Misconception:''' ''"[[Infinitives]] must not be [[Split infinitive|split]]."''
'''Misconception:''' ''[[Conjunction (grammar)|Conjunctions]] such as "and" and "but" must not begin a sentence.'' Those who [[disputes in English grammar#Examples|impose this rule]] on themselves are following a modern English "rule" that was not used historically. Jeremy Butterfield described this perceived prohibition as one of "the folk commandments of English usage".<ref>[[#But08|Butterfield 2008]]. p. 136.</ref> The ''Chicago Manual of Style'' says: <blockquote>There is a widespread belief—one with no historical or grammatical foundation—that it is an error to begin a sentence with a conjunction such as 'and', 'but', or 'so'. In fact, a substantial percentage (often as many as 10 percent) of the sentences in first-rate writing begin with conjunctions. It has been so for centuries, and even the most conservative grammarians have followed this practice.<ref>[[#Uni10|University of Chicago Press 2010]]. p. 257.</ref>{{Ref label|C|c|none}}</blockquote>▼
▲
Regarding the word "and", ''[[Fowler's Modern English Usage]]'' states, "There is a persistent belief that it is improper to begin a sentence with ''And'', but this prohibition has been cheerfully ignored by standard authors from Anglo-Saxon times onwards."<ref>[[#Bur96|Burchfield 1996]]. p. 52.</ref> ''[[Garner's Modern American Usage]]'' adds, "It is rank superstition that this coordinating conjunction <!-- meaning the word "and" --> cannot properly begin a sentence."<ref>[[#Gar03|Garner 2003]]. p. 44.</ref> The word "but" suffers from similar misconceptions. [[Bryan A. Garner|Garner]] says, "It is a gross canard that beginning a sentence with ''but'' is stylistically slipshod. In fact, doing so is highly desirable in any number of contexts, as many style books have said (many correctly pointing out that ''but'' is more effective than ''however'' at the beginning of a sentence)".<ref>[[#Gar03|Garner 2003]]. p. 118.</ref> ''[[Fowler's]]'' echoes this sentiment: "The widespread public belief that ''But'' should not be used at the beginning of a sentence seems to be unshakeable. Yet it has no foundation."<ref>[[#Bur96|Burchfield 1996]]. p. 121.</ref>▼
* '''Misconception:''' ''"[[Conjunction (grammar)|Conjunctions]] such as 'and' or 'but' must not begin a sentence."''
'''Misconception:''' ''The [[English passive voice|passive voice]] is incorrect.'' It is a misconception that the passive voice is always incorrect in English<ref>[[#Wal04|Walsh 2004]]. pp. 61, 68–69.</ref> and some "writing tutors" believe that the passive voice is to be avoided in all cases.<ref>[[#Pul09|Pullum 2009]].</ref> However, "there are legitimate uses for the passive voice," says Paul Brians.<ref name="Brians 2009. p. 169">[[#Bri09|Brians 2009]]. p. 169.</ref> [[Mignon Fogarty]] also points out that "passive sentences aren't incorrect,"<ref>[[#Fog10a|Fogarty 2010]]. "Active Voice Versus Passive Voice."</ref> and "If you don't know who is responsible for an action, passive voice can be the best choice."<ref>[[#Fog10a|Fogarty 2010]]. "Active Voice Versus Passive Voice."</ref>{{Ref label|D|d|none}} When the active or passive voice can be used without much awkwardness, there are [[disputes in English grammar#Examples|differing opinions]] about which is preferable. [[Bryan A. Garner]] notes, "Many writers talk about passive voice without knowing exactly what it is. In fact, many think that any BE-VERB signals passive voice."<ref>[[#Gar03|Garner 2003]]. p. 592.</ref>▼
Those who impose this rule on themselves or their students are following a modern English "rule" that was neither used historically nor universally followed in professional writing. [[Jeremy Butterfield]] described this perceived prohibition as one of "the folk commandments of English usage".<ref>[[#But08|Butterfield 2008]]. p. 136.</ref> The ''Chicago Manual of Style'' says:
'''Misconception:''' ''"[[Double negative]]" describes an incorrect usage.'' While some people use the term "double negative" only to refer to the [[nonstandard dialect|nonstandard]] use of a second negative to emphasise an already existing negation, the term can also refer to the usage of two negatives in an expression that can be interpreted as either a positive or a neutral statement, which is generally considered standard. For example, one could say "I am not unconvinced of that" to mean that one is convinced but with an emphasis on the absence of skepticism.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/double-negative|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130627233213/http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/double-negative|url-status = dead|archive-date = June 27, 2013|website = Lexico|publisher = Oxford|title = double negative}}</ref>▼
<blockquote>
▲
</blockquote>
▲Regarding the word "and", ''[[Fowler's Modern English Usage]]'' states
==Usage==▼
* '''Misconception:''' ''"The [[English passive voice|passive voice]] is incorrect."''
'''Misconception:''' ''[[Paragraph]]s must comprise at least three sentences''.{{Ref label|E|e|none}}<ref name="Cutts 2009. p. 112">[[#Cut09|Cutts 2009]]. p. 112.</ref> Richard Nordquist states that "no rule exists regarding the number of sentences that make up a paragraph," noting that professional writers use "paragraphs as short as a single word".<ref>[[#Nor11|Nordquist 2011]].</ref> According to the ''Oxford Guide to Plain English'': <blockquote>If you can say what you want to say in a single sentence that lacks a direct connection with any other sentence, just stop there and go on to a new paragraph. There's no rule against it. A paragraph can be a single sentence, whether long, short, or middling.<ref name="Cutts 2009. p. 112"/></blockquote>▼
The [[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill|University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's]] Writing Center states on its website, "Many students define paragraphs in terms of length: a paragraph is a group of at least five sentences, a paragraph is half a page long, etc." The website explains, "Length and appearance do not determine whether a section in a paper is a paragraph. For instance, in some styles of writing, particularly journalistic styles, a paragraph can be just one sentence long."<ref>[[#UNC11|University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2011]].</ref>▼
▲
Some proscriptions of passive voice stem from its use to avoid accountability or as [[weasel words]], rather than from its supposed ungrammaticality.
* '''Misconception:''' ''"[[Litotes]] or [[double negation]] (sometimes called '[[Double negative|double negatives]]') are always incorrect."''
▲
Some writers suggest avoiding nested negatives as a [[rule of thumb]] for clear and concise writing.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011-02-16 |title=Politics and the English Language |url=https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/politics-and-the-english-language/ |access-date=2023-07-29 |website=The Orwell Foundation |language=en-GB}}</ref> Overuse of nested negatives can result in sentences that are difficult to parse, as in the sentence "I am not sure whether it is not true to say that the Milton who once seemed not unlike a seventeenth-century Shelley had not become [...]".
▲==Usage==
{{main|English usage controversies}}
* '''Misconception:''' ''"[[Paragraph]]s must be at least three sentences long."''
▲
▲
* '''Misconception:''' ''"[[Contraction (grammar)|Contractions]] are not appropriate in proper English."''
'''Misconception:''' ''[[Contraction (grammar)|Contractions]] are not appropriate in proper English.'' Bill Walsh lists this as one of the "big myths of English usage"<ref>[[#Wal04|Walsh 2004]]. p. 61, 67–68.</ref> and [[Patricia T. O'Conner]] and [[Stewart Kellerman]] write, "A lot of people ... still seem to think that contractions are not quite ... ''quite''. If you do too, you're quite wrong." Writers such as [[Shakespeare]], [[Samuel Johnson]], and others since Anglo-Saxon days have been "shrinking English". Some opinion makers in the 17th and 18th century eschewed contractions, but beginning in the 1920s, usage guides have allowed them. "Most writing handbooks now recommend contractions", but "there are still lots of traditionalists out there who haven't gotten the word",<ref>[[#CK09|O'Conner and Kellerman 2009]]. pp. 32–34.</ref> contributing to the modern misconception that contractions are forbidden. A number of writing guides still recommend avoiding contractions in academic and formal writing.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sjprep.org/academics/english/style.html |title=SJP: English MLA Style Sheet |access-date=2012-04-09 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110830135545/http://www.sjprep.org/academics/english/style.html |archive-date=2011-08-30 }}. Saint Joseph’s Preparatory School</ref><ref>[http://www.basiccomposition.com/resources/AVOIDINGCONTRACTIONS.pdf] [http://www.basiccomposition.com/ABOUT.html Basic Composition.com] {{webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120129134401/http://www.basiccomposition.com/ABOUT.html |date=2012-01-29 }}</ref><ref>[http://www2.ivcc.edu/rambo/tip_formal_writing_voice.htm] [http://www2.ivcc.edu/rambo/eng1001/style.htm Illinois Valley Community College].</ref>▼
▲
==Semantics==
'''Misconception:''' ''"Healthy" has only recently been used to describe food.'' It is true that the adjective "healthful" has been pushed out in favour of "healthy" in recent times.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://grammarist.com/usage/healthful-healthy/|title=Healthful vs healthy|work=Grammarist|date=20 April 2011|access-date=2013-06-11}}</ref> However, the distinction between the words dates only to the 19th century. Before that, the words were used interchangeably; some examples date to the 16th century.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2012/02/healthy-healthful.html|title=Healthy choices|first1=Patricia|last1=O'Coner|first2=Stewart|last2=Kellerman|work=Grammarphobia Blog|date=2012-02-24|access-date=2013-06-11}}</ref> According to Professor Paul Brians, "Many argue 'people are healthy, but vegetables are ''healthful''<nowiki/>'"; however, "phrases like 'part of a healthy breakfast' have become so widespread that they are rarely perceived as erroneous except by the hyper-correct."<ref>[[#Bri09|Brians 2009]]. p. 108.</ref>▼
* '''Misconception:''' ''"Some commonly used words are not 'real words'."''
Common examples of words described as "not real" include "funnest", "impactful", and "mentee",<ref>{{cite web|url=http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/is-funnest-a-word.aspx|title=Is "Funnest" a Word?|first=Mignon|last=Fogarty|date=2008-09-12|access-date=2012-09-25|archive-date=2014-04-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140427083003/http://bridgingtheunbridgeable.com/2012/03/21/thusly-is-not-a-word-2/|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.volokh.com/posts/1187887242.shtml|title=Is Not A Word|first=Eugene|last=Vokloh|date=2007-08-23|access-date=2012-09-25}}</ref> all of which are in common use, appear in numerous dictionaries as English words,<ref>[[#Dictionary.com|Dictionary.com]]. "Conversate"; [[#AllWords|AllWords.com]]. "Conversate"; [[#Lexicus|Lexicus]]. "Conversate".</ref><ref>[[#Dictionary.com|Dictionary.com]]. "Funnest"; [[#Oxford|Oxford English Dictionary]]. "Fun" [[#Scrabble|Scrabble Word Finder]]. "Funnest"; [[#AllWords|AllWords.com]]. "Funnest"; [[#Lexicus|Lexicus]]. "Funnest".</ref><ref>[[#Dictionary.com|Dictionary.com]]. "Impactful"; [[#Oxford|Oxford English Dictionary]]. "Impactful"; [[#Scrabble|Scrabble Word Finder]]. "Impactful"; [[#Collins|Collins Dictionaries]]. "Impactful"; [[#Lexicus|Lexicus]]. "Impactful".</ref><ref>[[#FreeDictionary|Free Dictionary]]. "Mentee"; [[#Dictionary.com|Dictionary.com]]. "Mentee"; [[#Oxford|Oxford English Dictionary]]. "Mentee"; [[#YourDictionary|YourDictionary.com]]. "Mentee"; [[#Scrabble|Scrabble Word Finder]]. "Mentee"; [[#AllWords|AllWords.com]]. "Mentee"; [[#Vocabulary.com|Vocabulary.com]]. "Mentee"; [[#Collins|Collins Dictionaries]]. "Mentee"; [[#Lexicus|Lexicus]]. "Mentee".</ref> and follow standard rules for constructing English words from [[Morpheme|morphemes]]. Many linguists follow a [[linguistic description|descriptive]] approach to language, where some usages are labeled merely nonstandard, not improper or incorrect.
* '''Misconception:''' ''""Inflammable" can only mean 'flammable'." / {{"'}}Inflammable' can only mean 'not flammable'."''
'''Misconception:''' ''"Nauseous" cannot mean suffering from nausea.'' Some writers on language, such as [[Theodore Menline Bernstein|Theodore Bernstein]] and [[Bill Bryson]], have advanced the idea that "nauseous" means only causing nausea (i.e., nauseating), not suffering from it (nauseated), and that it is therefore incorrect to say "I am nauseous" unless one means to say "I inspire nausea in others". This prescription is contradicted by vast evidence from English usage, and Merriam-Webster finds no source for the rule before a published letter by a physician, Deborah Leary, in 1949.<ref>[[#MW1995|Merriam-Webster 1995]]. p. 652.</ref>▼
The word "inflammable" can be derived by two different constructions, both following standard rules of English grammar: appending the suffix ''-able'' to the word ''inflame'' creates a word meaning "able to be inflamed", while adding the prefix ''in-'' to the word ''flammable'' creates a word meaning "not flammable". Thus "inflammable" is an [[auto-antonym]], a word that can be its own antonym, depending on context. Because of the risk of confusion, style guides sometimes recommend using the unambiguous terms "flammable" and "not flammable".<ref>[[#Bri09|Brians 2009]]. p. 124.</ref>
* '''Misconception:''' ''"It is incorrect to use 'nauseous' to refer to a person's state."''
▲
* '''Misconception:''' ''"It is incorrect to use 'healthy' to refer to things that are good for a person's health."''
▲
==Notes==
Line 46 ⟶ 73:
:'''a.'''{{Note label|A|a|none}}For example, among the top ten usage "errors" submitted to the BBC was the supposed prohibition against using double negatives.
:'''b.'''{{Note label|B|b|none}}[[The Churchill Centre]] describes a similar version as "An invented phrase put in Churchill's mouth".<ref>[[#Chu11|The Churchill Centre and Museum at the Churchill War Rooms, London 2011]]. (The original text is italicized.)</ref>
:'''c.'''{{Note label|C|c|none}}''Chicago'' elaborates by noting Charles Allen Lloyd's observations on this phenomenon: "Next to the groundless notion that it is incorrect to end an English sentence with a preposition, perhaps the most wide-spread of the many false beliefs about the use of our language is the equally groundless notion that it is incorrect to begin one with
:'''d.'''{{Note label|D|d|none}}These authors are quick to point out, however, that the passive voice is not necessarily ''better''—it's simply a myth that the passive voice is ''wrong''. For example, Brians states that
{{refend}}
==See also==
*[[English usage controversies]]
*[[Linguistic prescription]]
*[[List of English words with disputed usage]]
Line 65 ⟶ 91:
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book|title= Language Myths|editor1-first= Laurie|editor1-last= Bauer|editor2-first= Peter|editor2-last= Trudgill|year= 1998|publisher= Penguin Books|___location= London|isbn= 978-0-14-026023-6|ref= Bau98|url= https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780140260236}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.crivoice.org/symbols/xmasorigin.html |title=The Origin of "Xmas" |access-date=10 June 2011 |publisher=CRI / Voice, Institute |author=Bratcher, Dennis |date=3 December 2007 |ref=Bra07 }}
* {{cite book |title= Common Errors in English Usage|edition= 2nd|last= Brians|first= Paul|year= 2009|publisher= William, James & Company|___location= Wilsonville |ref=Bri09}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Burchfield |editor-first= R. W. |title=Fowler's Modern English Usage |year= 1996 |publisher=Oxford University Press |___location= Oxford |isbn=0-19-869126-2|ref=Bur96|title-link= Fowler's Modern English Usage }}
Line 72 ⟶ 98:
* {{cite book |title=Oxford Guide to Plain English|edition= Third|last= Cutts|first= Martin|year= 2009|publisher= Oxford University Press|___location= Oxford|isbn= 978-0-19-955850-6|ref=Cut09}}
* {{cite book |title= The Elements of Typographic Style|last= Bringhurst|first=Robert|year= 2005|publisher= Hartley and Marks|___location= Vancouver|isbn= 0-88179-206-3|ref=Bri05}}
* {{cite web |url= http://www.winstonchurchill.org/learn/speeches/quotations/famous-quotations-and-stories |title= Famous Quotations and Stories |author= The Churchill Centre and Museum at the Churchill War Rooms, London |date= March 2009 |access-date= 30 August 2011 |ref= Chu11 }}
* {{cite web
* {{cite book|title= Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing|author-link= Mignon Fogarty|last= Fogarty|first= Mignon|year= 2008|publisher= Holt Paperbacks|___location= New York|isbn= 978-0-8050-8831-1|ref= Fog08|url-access= registration|url= https://archive.org/details/grammargirlsquic0000foga}}
* {{cite web
* {{cite web
* {{cite book |title= Grammar Girl Presents the Ultimate Writing Guide for Students |author-link=Mignon Fogarty|last= Fogarty|first= Mignon|year= 2011|publisher= Henry Holt & Company|___location= New York|isbn= 978-0-8050-8943-1|pages= 45–46|ref=Fog11}}
* {{cite book |author-link=Bryan A. Garner |last=Garner |first= Bryan A. |title=Garner's Modern American Usage |year= 2003 |publisher=Oxford University Press |___location= New York |isbn=0-19-516191-2|ref=Gar03|title-link=Garner's Modern American Usage }}
Line 82 ⟶ 108:
* {{cite book |title= About Face: Reviving the Rules of Typography|last= Jury|first= David|year= 2004|publisher= Rotovision SA|___location= Switzerland|isbn= 2-88046-798-5 |ref=Jur04}}
* {{cite book |title= We Who Speak English: and Our Ignorance of Our Mother Tongue|last= Lloyd|first= Charles Allen|year= 1938|publisher= Thomas Y. Crowell|___location= New York |ref=Llo38}}
* {{cite web
* {{cite book |title= Merriam Webster Dictionary of English Usage|author= Merriam-Webster|year= 1995|publisher= Merriam-Webster |ref=MW1995}}
* {{cite web
* {{cite book |title= Origins of the Specious: Myths and Misconceptions of the English Language|last1= O'Conner|first1= Patricia T.|last2= Kellerman|first2= Stewart|year= 2009|publisher= Random House|___location= New York|isbn= 978-1-4000-6660-5|ref=CK09}}
*{{cite book |title= Woe is I: The Grammarphobe's Guide to Better English in Plain English|edition= Third|last= O'Conner|first= Patricia T. |year= 2009|publisher= Riverhead Books|___location= New York|isbn= 978-1-59448-890-0|ref=O'C09}}
* {{cite magazine
* {{cite web
* {{cite book |title= Type Rules!: The Designer's Guide to Professional Typography|edition= 3rd|last= Strizver|first= Ilene|year= 2010|publisher= John Wiley & Sons|___location= New Jersey|isbn= 978-0-470-54251-4|ref=Str10}}
* {{cite book |author=University of Chicago Press |title=The Chicago Manual of Style |edition=16th |year= 2010 |publisher=Univ. of Chicago Press |___location= Chicago |isbn=978-0-226-10420-1|ref=Chi10}}
* {{cite web |url= http://writing-program.uchicago.edu/resources/grammar.htm |title= Grammar Resources |author= University of Chicago Writing Program |work= University of Chicago Writing Program |publisher= University of Chicago |access-date= 25 October 2011 |ref= Uni00 |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20111026033926/http://writing-program.uchicago.edu/resources/grammar.htm |archive-date= 26 October 2011 }}
* {{cite book|title= The Elephants of Style: A Trunkload of Tips on the Big Issues and Gray Areas of Contemporary American English|last= Walsh|first= Bill|year= 2004|publisher= McGraw Hill|___location= New York|isbn= 978-0-07-142268-0|ref= Wal04|url= https://archive.org/details/elephantsofstyle00wals}}
* {{cite web
{{Refend}}
==External links==
* {{cite web |url= http://www.grammarphobia.com/grammar.html|title= Grammar Myths|author= Patricia T. O'Conner and Stewart Kellerman|year= 2003|work
* {{cite web
[[Category:English language]]
| |||