Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Computer networking task force: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:25, 16 February 2022

Latest revision as of 13:31, 30 July 2025

(14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{talkheader|search=yes|archive_age=90|archive_bot=MiszaBot II}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject Computing|network=yes}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|maxarchivesize = 100K

Line 18 ⟶ 20:

Thanks. — [[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]]&nbsp;{^{[[User talk:Headbomb|ταλκ]]}<sub style="margin-left:-4.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|κοντριβς]]</sub>&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp;[[WP:PHYS|WP Physics]]} 08:59, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

==[[Draft:EEBUS]] Wanted pages? ==

Dear all, I just started writing my very first Wikipedia article ever. However, I underestimated the complexity and was not aware of review processes. So it seems I should have added some metainformation so that my article shows up here or in a related project, if I get things right. So, how do I get the following article reviewed? [[Draft:EEBUS]] Is this the right project? If the official answer is that I cannot skip the (currently) estimated 6 months of review, I will of course accept this. But as a newbie this is a little frustrating right now. I appreciate your help! [[User:DrJHinker|DrJHinker]] ([[User talk:DrJHinker|talk]]) 07:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Are any of these redlinked terms previously mentioned in {{tl|Area networks}} potentially notable. See [[Template talk:Area networks#Wanted Pages?]] ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 04:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

:{{re|DrJHinker}} Congratulations! It looks like you have it properly queued for review at [[WP:AFC]]. The AFC process is optional for [[WP:AUTOCONFIRMED]] editors. Once your user account is 4 days old and you have made 10 edits with it, you should be able to [[WP:MOVE]] your draft to mainspace yourself. The AFC process is valuable if you have a [[WP:COI]] or are concerned about your article being unceremoniously deleted due to issues that AFC reviewers can help you resolve. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 00:27, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

== Verizon updates (5G)[[Draft:Tranalyzer]] ==

Here's an abandoned draft on a potentially notable network topic if anyone wants to take it on ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 19:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I posted requests at [[Talk:Verizon_Wireless#5G_update|Talk:Verizon Wireless]] and [[Talk:Verizon_Communications#5G_update|Talk:Verizon Communications]] to update Verizon's 5G efforts. The suggested updates might interest editors of this WikiProject. As I work for Verizon and have a conflict of interest, I ask others to review my work and make edits on my behalf. Thank you, [[User:VZEric|VZEric]] ([[User talk:VZEric|talk]]) 22:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

:{{ping|Kvng}} As you seem active in this topic, would you be able to review this request? Thank you, [[User:VZEric|VZEric]] ([[User talk:VZEric|talk]]) 17:30, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

::Those are not articles I've done any work on previously. I'm much more active on technology topics than articles about technology companies. I have watchlisted these and will have a look when I get a chance. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 18:19, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

:::Thanks! I appreciate any feedback. I saw that you were active on this Talk page, so I thought it could possibly interest you. [[User:VZEric|VZEric]] ([[User talk:VZEric|talk]]) 12:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

:{{done}} {{ping|Kvng}} Letting you know this is resolved. [[User:VZEric|VZEric]] ([[User talk:VZEric|talk]]) 16:24, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

== IP over Avian CarriersTemplate:IoT ==

Hey there,

[[IP over Avian Carriers]] concerns joke RFC 1149 about using pigeons to carry packets. Should a photo of a dead pigeon be added ([[Special:Diff/958431215|diff]]) as "An example of packet loss"? Please edit the article or comment at [[Talk:IP over Avian Carriers#Dead bird photo]]. A month ago, I semi-protected the article (now expired) and would like to stay uninvolved. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 05:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I'm drafting an [[User:François Robere/sandbox/Template:IoT|infobox on IoT]]. [Many] additions and corrections would be welcome.

==[[:Category:Computer networking articles needing expert attention]] has been nominated for discussion==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>'''[[:Category:Computer networking articles needing expert attention]]''' has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorization]] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 May 16#Empty expert subject categories|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. [[User:Peaceray|Peaceray]] ([[User talk:Peaceray|talk]]) 07:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Cheers,

== Wanted pages? ==

[[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 17:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Are any of these redlinked terms previously mentioned in {{tl|Area networks}} potentially notable. See [[Template talk:Area networks#Wanted Pages?]] ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 04:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

:Left some comments at [[User talk:François Robere/sandbox/Template:IoT]] ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

== RFC links ==

Please see [[Template_talk:IETF_RFC#Discussion_at_WP%3AELN_§_Templates_being_used_to_embed_external_links_into_articles]] for a discussion about external links to IETF RFCs in article bodies. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 00:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)