Talk:Symmetric-key algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edit by 2601:3C6:180:59B0:D12F:E49D:382B:7A18 (talk) to last version by PrimeBOT
One-time pad?: should be mentioned.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|vital=yes|1=
{{Vital article|topic=Technology|level=5|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Cryptography|class=start|importance=Top|computer-science-importance=High}}
}}
{{Copied|from=Reciprocal cipher|from_oldid=594888807|to=Symmetric-key algorithm|to_oldid=694433513|to_diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Symmetric-key_algorithm&diff=prev&oldid=694433513}}
 
Line 87 ⟶ 88:
Isn't a one-time pad a symmetric cipher? If so it isn't mentioned here. [[User:RichardAlexanderHall|RichardAlexanderHall]] ([[User talk:RichardAlexanderHall|talk]]) 16:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
:Technically it is -- the keys on both sides are the same, however it is not really a practical example, since the shared secret is very large. Do you think it makes sense to use it as an example? [[User:Namnatulco|Namnatulco]] ([[User talk:Namnatulco|talk]]) 14:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 
:: I agree that the one-time pad is a kind of symmetric cipher, and should be mentioned here. I see that it's currently very briefly mentioned. Perhaps a few more words may be useful.
:: I fail to see why [[User:Namnatulco|Namnatulco]] feels one-time pad is "not really practical", since the [[one-time pad]] article has a long list of examples of its use in practice -- clearly those users feel it is practical. --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] ([[User talk:DavidCary|talk]]) 19:37, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
 
== About history and differences between algorithm and cryptography ==