Embodied embedded cognition: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
C12H23 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(60 intermediate revisions by 42 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Theory that intelligent behaviour emerges from the interplay between brain, body and world}}
'''Embodied Embedded Cognition''' (EEC) is a [[philosophy|philosophical]] theoretical position in [[cognitive science]], closely related to [[situated cognition]], [[embodied cognition]], [[embodied cognitive science]] and [[dynamical systems theory]]. The theory states that intelligent [[behaviour]] emerges out of the interplay between [[brain]], body and world. The world is not just the 'play-ground' on which the brain is acting. Rather, brain, body and world are equally important factors in the explanation of how particular intelligent behaviours come about in practice.
{{See also|Enactivism|Embodied cognition|Extended cognition}}
{{refimprove|date=October 2019}}
'''Embodied Embeddedembedded Cognitioncognition''' ('''EEC''') is a [[philosophy|philosophical]] theoretical position in [[cognitive science]], closely related to [[situated cognition]], [[embodied cognition]], [[embodied cognitive science]] and [[dynamical systems theory]]. The theory states that intelligent [[behaviour]] emerges out offrom the interplay between [[brain]], body and world.<ref name=EEE1>{{cite web|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/embodied-cognition/|title=Embodied Cognition |date=25 July 2011|publisher=Stanford Encyclopedia}}</ref> The world is not just the 'play-ground' on which the brain is acting. Rather, brain, body and world are equally important factors in the explanation of how particular intelligent behaviours come about in practice.
 
==Embodiment and Embeddednessembeddedness==
 
EEC is divided into two aspects: [[embodiment]] and embeddedness (or situatedness).
 
''Embodiment'' refers to the idea that the bodiesbody's internal milieu (a.o. [[homeostatic]] and hormonal states) heavily influences the higher 'cognitive' processes in the brain, presumably via the [[emotion]]al system (see e.g. [[Antonio Damasio]]'s theory of [[Somatic markers hypothesis|somatic markers]]). To put it simply: the state of your body is a direct factor of importance on the kinds of [[cognitive process]]es that may arise in the higher parts of your brain.
 
''Embeddedness'' refers to the idea that physical interaction between the body and the world strongly constrain the possible behaviours of the organism, which in turn influences (indeed, partly constitutes) the cognitive processes that emerge out offrom the interaction between organism and world.
 
The theory is an explicit reaction to the currently dominant [[Cognitivism (psychology)|cognitivist]] paradigm, which states that cognitive systems are essentially computational-representational systems (like computer [[software]]), processing input and generating output (behaviour) on the basis of internal information processing. In [[cognitivism]], the causal root of behaviour lies in the 'virtual' processes governed by the software that runs on our brains. The brain is purely the [[computer hardware|hardware]] on which the software is implemented. The body (sensors and actors) are purely input-output devices that are in service of the brain. The world is merely the play-ground (the object) in which the cognitive agent acts.
 
In contrast, EEC holds that the actual physical processes in body and in body-world interaction partly constitute whatever it is that we call 'the cognitive system' as a whole. Body, world and brain form a system. Together these system-parts 'cause' intelligent behaviour to arise as a system property. ''[[Dynamical Systems|Dynamical Systems Theory'']] is a way of modeling behaviour that teams up quite naturally with the theoretical concepts of EEC. The theory of [[practopoiesis]] describes the rules adaptive systems need to obey if they are to successfully implement embodied and embedded cognition.
 
Under the umbrella of [[4E cognition]], the theories of the embodied embedded mind are connected with the [[Extended mind thesis|extended mind theory]] and [[enactivism]].
 
Current discussions include:
* Is EEC really a (positive) theory of itself, or merely a bunch of complaints about what is wrong about (a too extreme version of) cognitivism?
* Is EEC too 'descriptive', instead of really explaining anything about cognition?
* How can EEC explain [[natural language|linguistic]] processes and processes of explicit conscious [[reasoning]]?
* What would be the most informative empirical hypotheses, starting from an EEC perspective?
* Can we use traditional methods (stimulus-response paradigms) of [[experimental psychology]] to test EEC hypotheses?
Line 23 ⟶ 28:
 
Theorists that inspired the EEC programme (but might not necessarily adhere to the above position) include:
{{div col|colwidth=18em}}
 
* [[Lawrence Barsalou]]
* [[Randall Beer]]
* [[Valentino Braitenberg]]
Line 29 ⟶ 35:
* [[William Clancey]]
* [[Andy Clark]]
* [[Paul Dourish]]
* [[Gerald Edelman]]
* [[Shaun Gallagher]]
* [[PimVittorio HaselagerGuidano]]
* Pim Haselager
* [[Fred Keijzer]]
* [[AlvaMartin NoeHeidegger]]
* [[Susan Hurley]]
* [[Edmund Husserl]]
* [[Edwin Hutchins]]
* [[Fred Keijzer]]
* [[David Kirsh]]
* [[Humberto Maturana]]
* [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]]
* [[Alva Noë]]
* [[Jean Piaget]]
* [[Eleanor Rosch]]
* [[Mark Rowlands]]
* [[Evan Thompson]]
* [[Francisco Varela]]
* [[TomJacob ZiemkeVon Uexküll]]
* [[Dan Zahavi]]
* Tom Ziemke
{{div col end}}
 
==See Alsoalso==
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
*{{annotated link|Autopoesis}}
*{{annotated link|Enactivism}}
*{{annotated link|Extended cognition}}
*{{annotated link|Neuroconstructivism}}
*{{annotated link|Neurophenomenology}}
*{{annotated link|Practopoiesis}}
*{{annotated link|Pragmatism}}
[[*{{annotated link|Situated cognition]]}}
{{div col end}}
 
== References ==
[[Situated cognition]]
<references />
 
==External links==
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20060205103318/http://www.nici.kun.nl/~haselag/links/eeclinks.html Some EEC links]
 
[[Category:Cognitive science]]