Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1062091198 by 38.22.48.156 (talk)Restored sourced statements. Read the article, that is well covered in the article. |
Amitmanager2 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(37 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Problem-based job interview technique}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2015}}
A '''coding interview''', '''technical interview''', '''programming interview''' or '''Microsoft interview''' is a technical problem-based [[job interview]] technique to assess
==Innovation==
== Questions ==
The questions asked during
▲The questions asked during the Microsoft Interview are crafted to determine a candidate's problem solving, coding and design abilities. Eccentric questions (such as ''Which of the fifty states would you remove?'') test a candidate's ability to come to a decision and articulate it.<ref>Poundstone, page 67.</ref> Candidates answering questions should consider the use of technology in the present and future, and [[user scenarios]]. Some questions involve projects that the candidate has worked on in the past.
Typical questions that a candidate might be asked to answer during the second-round interview include:<ref>{{Cite web |date=4 September 2024 |title=Coding Interview Questions |url=https://interviewquestionanswers.net/technical/java-interview-questions/ |publisher=OmniJobs}}</ref>
▲The Microsoft Interview is intended to seek out creative thinkers and those who can adapt their solutions to rapidly changing and dynamic scenarios.
* Design a GPS navigation unit for a hiker.
* Design a communication device for Canadian [[park
* Shift all elements of a [[circular buffer|circular array]] by ''k'' bytes, using no extra memory.
===
Microsoft popularized the question of why [[manhole covers]] are typically round (in some countries) when they began asking it as a job interview question.<ref name="Poundstone" /> Originally meant as a psychological assessment of how one approaches a question with more than one correct answer, the problem has produced a number of alternative explanations, from the [[tautology (rhetoric)|tautological]] ("Manhole covers are round because manholes are round.")<ref name="Poundstone" /> to the philosophical.
By 2012, the practice of asking [[lateral thinking]] questions had declined at companies including Microsoft and Google. A study by [[San Francisco State University]] associate professor of psychology Chris Wright found that puzzle interview questions annoyed job applicants. "Methods that had a transparent relationship between test content and job duties, such as interviews, work samples, and reference checks were perceived more favorably," Wright wrote in a research paper entitled "Why Are Manhole Covers Round? A Laboratory Study of Reactions to Puzzle Interviews". Poundstone, who had written puzzle interview guides for Microsoft and Google, referred to puzzle questions in 2012 as "a sort of fad" that lost popularity because of a lack of evidence of their effectiveness.<ref name="time-2012">{{cite magazine |last1=White |first1=Martha C. |title=No-Brainer: 'Brainteaser' Job Interview Questions Don't Work |url=https://business.time.com/2012/10/23/no-brainer-brainteaser-job-interview-questions-dont-work/ |access-date=July 4, 2022 |magazine=Time |date=October 23, 2012}}</ref>
==References==
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Microsoft culture]]
[[Category:Job interview]]
|