Content deleted Content added
Absolutiva (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (40 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown) | |||
Line 10:
| commercial = No
| type = Digital library index
| language = [[English language|English]], [[Czech language|Czech]], [[German language|German]], [[French language|French]], [[Croatian language|Croatian]], [[Italian language|
| registration = Free
| license = {{Plain list|
* Data: public ___domain<ref>{{Cite web|title=Using Open Library Data § Who owns the Open Library catalog?|url=https://openlibrary.org/help/faq/using?v=8#ownership|date=2013-10-10|author1=Bookfinch|first2=Anand|last2=Chitipothu|first3=George|last3=Oates|first4=Jessamyn|last4=West|access-date=2021-04-06|archive-date=2022-04-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220411005734/https://openlibrary.org/help/faq/using?v=8#ownership|url-status=live}}</ref>
* Source code: [[GNU Affero General Public License|AGPLv3]]<ref name=gitlic/>
}}
| launch_date = {{Start date and age|2006}}
| current_status = Active
| founder = [[Aaron Swartz]], [[Brewster Kahle]],
| revenue = Donation
}}
'''Open Library''' is an online project intended to create "one [[web page]] for every book ever published". Created by [[Aaron Swartz]],<ref name="BBC2007"/><ref name="Guardian2009"/> [[Brewster Kahle]],<ref>{{cite web|title = Aaron Swartz: howtoget |url = https://aaronsw.jottit.com/howtoget |publisher = Aaronsw.jottit.com|access-date = 2015-06-05|url-status = live |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150523080104/http://aaronsw.jottit.com/howtoget| archive-date = 2015-05-23}}</ref> Alexis Rossi,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web| url=https://openlibrary.org/about/people.en|title=The Open Library Team |publisher=Open Library |language=en|access-date=2018-07-16| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180717013214/https://openlibrary.org/about/people.en|archive-date=2018-07-17|url-status=live}}</ref> Anand Chitipothu,<ref name=":0" /> and Rebecca Hargrave Malamud,<ref name=":0" /> Open Library is a project of the [[Internet Archive]], a [[nonprofit organization]]. It has been funded in part by grants from the [[California State Library]] and the Kahle/Austin Foundation. <!-- PLEASE DO NOT LINK [[Kahle/Austin Foundation]] because that page is a redirect to already-linked [[Brewster Kahle]]--> Open Library provides [[online]] digital copies in multiple formats, created from images of many [[public ___domain]], out-of-print, and in-print books.
==Book database and digital lending library==
Line 32:
* editions (which are different publications of the corresponding works)
Open Library claims to have over 20 million records in its database.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://openlibrary.org/about |title=About Us |publisher=Openlibrary.org |access-date=2015-06-26 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150627092210/https://openlibrary.org/about |archive-date=2015-06-27 }}</ref> Copies of the contents of tens of thousands of modern books have been made available from 150 libraries and publishers for [[ebook]] [[controlled digital lending]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://archive.org/post/349420/in-library-ebook-lending-program-launched |title=Internet Archive Forums: In-Library eBook Lending Program Launched |date=2011-02-22 |access-date=2015-06-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150717121618/https://archive.org/post/349420/in-library-ebook-lending-program-launched |archive-date=2015-07-17 |url-status=live }}</ref> Other books including in-print and in-copyright books have been scanned from copies in library collections, library discards, and donations, and are also available for lending in digital form.<ref>{{cite web |title=FAQ on Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) |date=13 February 2019 |url=https://nwu.org/book-division/cdl/faq/ |access-date=2019-02-14 |archive-date=2020-03-30 |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20200330193826/https://nwu.org/book%2Ddivision/cdl/faq/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In total, the Open Library offers copies of over 1.4 million books for what it calls "digital lending", but critics have called distribution of digital copies a violation of copyright law.
==
Open Library began in 2006 with [[Aaron Swartz]] as the original engineer and leader of the Open Library's technical team.<ref name="BBC2007">{{cite news | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/6924022.stm | access-date=2010-07-06 | title=A library bigger than any building | publisher=[[BBC News]] | date=2007-07-31 | url-status=live | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091127185623/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/6924022.stm | archive-date=2009-11-27 }}</ref><ref name="Guardian2009">{{cite news | url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/22/library-search-engines-books | access-date=2010-07-06 | title=Why you can't find a library book in your search engine | newspaper=The Guardian | date=2009-01-22 | ___location=London | first=Wendy M | last=Grossman | url-status=live | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140114010642/http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/22/library-search-engines-books | archive-date=2014-01-14 }}</ref> The project was led by [[George Oates]] from April 2009 to December 2011.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://openlibrary.org/people/george08 |title=George |publisher=Openlibrary.org |access-date=2015-06-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222055108/https://openlibrary.org/people/george08 |archive-date=2017-02-22 |url-status=live }}</ref> Oates was responsible for a complete site redesign during her tenure.<ref>{{cite web |last=Oates |first=George |url=http://blog.openlibrary.org/2010/03/17/announcing-the-open-library-redesign/ |title=Announcing the Open Library redesign « The Open Library Blog |publisher=Blog.openlibrary.org |date=2010-03-17 |access-date=2015-06-26 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150627185859/http://blog.openlibrary.org/2010/03/17/announcing-the-open-library-redesign/ |archive-date=2015-06-27 }}</ref> In 2015, the project was continued by Giovanni Damiola<ref name=":0" /> and then Brenton Cheng<ref name=":0" /> and Mek Karpeles<ref name=":0" /> in 2016.
The site was redesigned and relaunched in May 2010. Its codebase is on [[GitHub]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary/|title=internetarchive/openlibrary · GitHub|publisher=GitHub.com|access-date=2015-06-26|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150810081247/https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary|archive-date=2015-08-10}}</ref> The site uses Infobase, its own database framework based on [[PostgreSQL]], and Infogami, its own [[Wiki software|Wiki engine]] written in [[Python (programming language)|Python]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://openlibrary.org/about/tech |title=About the Technology |publisher=Openlibrary.org |access-date=2015-06-26 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150627065429/https://openlibrary.org/about/tech |archive-date=2015-06-27 }}</ref> The source code to the site is published under the [[
==Book sponsorship program==
In the week of October 21, 2019, the Open Library website introduced a Book Sponsorship program,<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Internet Archive Book Drive {{!}} Open Library |url=https://openlibrary.org/bookdrive |access-date=2022-06-05 |website=openlibrary.org |archive-date=2022-06-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220605121050/https://openlibrary.org/bookdrive |url-status=live }}</ref> which according to [[Cory Doctorow]], "lets you direct a cash donation to pay for the purchase and scanning of any books. In return, you are first in line to check that book out when it is available, and then anyone who holds an Open Library library card can check it out.".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Doctorow |first1=Cory |title=The Internet Archive's Open Library will let you sponsor a book, paying for it to be scanned |url=https://boingboing.net/2019/10/22/hathi-never-forgets.html |website=BoingBoing |access-date=2019-10-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191023125120/https://boingboing.net/2019/10/22/hathi-never-forgets.html |archive-date=2019-10-23 |url-status=live |date=2019-10-22}}</ref> The feature was developed by Mek Karpeles, Tabish Shaikh,<ref name=":0" /> and other members of the community.<ref>{{cite web |last1=El-Sabrout |first1=Omar Rafik |title=Scan On Demand: Building the World's Open Library, Together |url=http://blog.openlibrary.org/2019/10/23/scan-on-demand-building-the-worlds-open-library-together |website=The Open Library Blog |date=23 October 2019 |access-date=2019-10-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191024160902/http://blog.openlibrary.org/2019/10/23/scan-on-demand-building-the-worlds-open-library-together/ |archive-date=2019-10-24 |url-status=live }}</ref>
==Books for the blind and dyslexic==
The website was relaunched adding [[ADA compliance]] and offering over
==Copyright violation accusations==
The Open Library has justified its ability to offer full contents of books in digital formats as part of the [[first-sale doctrine]] and [[fair use]] law.<ref>{{cite report | url = https://controlleddigitallending.org/whitepaper#_Toc524383330 | title = A White Paper on Controlled Digital Lending of Library Books | first1 = David R. | last1 = Hansen | first2 = Kyle K. | last2 = Courtney | date = 2018 | publisher = Controlled Digital Lendings by Libraries | access-date = 2020-04-02 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190802221324/https://controlleddigitallending.org/whitepaper#_Toc524383330 | archive-date = 2019-08-02 | url-status = live }}</ref><ref name="vox open library">{{cite web | url = https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/4/2/21201193/emergency-library-internet-archive-controversy-coronavirus-pandemic | title = Why authors are so angry about the Internet Archive's Emergency Library | first = Constance | last = Grady | date = 2020-04-02 | access-date = 2020-04-02 | work = [[Vox (website)|Vox]] | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200404010247/https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/4/2/21201193/emergency-library-internet-archive-controversy-coronavirus-pandemic | archive-date = 2020-04-04 | url-status = live }}</ref> The Open Library owns a physical copy of each book that they have made available, and thus argue that the lending out of one digital scan of the book in a controlled manner falls within the first-sale doctrine, a practice known as [[Controlled Digital Lending|controlled digital lending]] and in use by multiple public and academic libraries.<ref name="vox open library"/>
Since its launch, the Open Library has been accused of mass copyright violation by numerous groups,<ref name="vox open library"/> including the American [[Authors Guild]],<ref name=jotformeu-usa>{{Cite web |author=The Authors Guild |author-link=Authors Guild |title=Open Letter to Internet Archive and Other Proponents of 'Controlled Digital Lending' |url=https://form.jotform.com/90035152846151 |publisher=[[JotForm]] |access-date=2019-04-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190728030522/https://form.jotform.com/90035152846151 |archive-date=2019-07-28 |url-status=
=== ''Hachette v. Internet Archive'' ===
{{Main|Hachette v. Internet Archive{{!}}''Hachette v. Internet Archive''}}
The Open Library further came under criticism from several authors and publishers groups when it created the [[Internet Archive#National Emergency Library|National Emergency Library]] in response to the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] in March 2020. Under these circumstances, the National Emergency Library removed the waitlists of all books in its Open Library collection and allowed any number of digital copies of a book to be downloaded as an encrypted file that would be unusable after two weeks, asserting that this unlimited borrowing was a reasonable exception under the national emergency to allow educational functions to continue since physical libraries and bookstores were forced to be shuttered.<ref name="vox open library"/> The Authors Guild, the Association of American Publishers, the National Writers Union, and others argued that this allowed unlimited copyright infringement and denied revenues from distribution of authorized digital copies of books to authors who also needed relief during the COVID-19 national emergency.<ref name="vox open library"/> Though the Open Library asserted that the copies of entire books in e-book format were still encrypted and the unlimited borrowing was for educational purposes, the National Writers Union asserted that images of each page of each book could still be accessed on the Web without encryption or other controls.<ref name="National Writers Union"/><ref>{{cite web |last1=Hasbrouck |first1=Edward |title=Internet Archive removes controls on "lending" of bootleg e-books |date=24 March 2020 |url=https://nwu.org/internet-archive-removes-controls-on-lending-of-bootleg-e-books/ |publisher=National Writers Union |access-date=2020-05-07}}</ref>
Four major publishers—[[Hachette Book Group|Hachette]], [[Penguin Random House]], [[Wiley (publisher)|John Wiley & Sons]], and [[HarperCollins]], all members of the [[Association of American Publishers]]—filed a lawsuit in the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York|Southern New York Federal District Court]] against the Internet Archive in June 2020, asserting the Open Library project violated numerous copyrights.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Publishers Are Taking the Internet to Court|url=https://www.thenation.com/article/society/publishers-are-taking-the-internet-to-court/|date=2020-09-10|first=Maria|last=Bustillos|work=The Nation|access-date=2020-10-19|archive-date=2021-08-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210823160450/https://www.thenation.com/article/society/publishers-are-taking-the-internet-to-court/|url-status=live}}</ref> In their suit, the publishers claimed "Without any license or any payment to authors or publishers, [the Internet Archive] scans print books, uploads these illegally scanned books to its servers, and distributes verbatim digital copies of the books in whole via public-facing websites. With just a few clicks, any Internet-connected user can download complete digital copies of in-copyright books from [the] defendant."<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/1/21277036/internet-archive-publishers-lawsuit-open-library-ebook-lending | title = Publishers sue Internet Archive over Open Library ebook lending | first = Russell | last = Brandom | date = 2020-06-01 | access-date = 2020-06-01 | work = [[The Verge]] | archive-date = 2020-06-01 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200601185706/https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/1/21277036/internet-archive-publishers-lawsuit-open-library-ebook-lending | url-status = live }}</ref> The publishers were represented by the law firms [[Davis Wright Tremaine]] and [[Oppenheim + Zebrak]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Publishers File Suit Against Internet Archive for Systematic Mass Scanning and Distribution of Literary Works |url=https://publishers.org/news/publishers-file-suit-against-internet-archive-for-systematic-mass-scanning-and-distribution-of-literary-works/ |work=AAP |date=2020-06-01 |access-date=2020-06-05 |archive-date=2020-06-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200605233623/https://publishers.org/news/publishers-file-suit-against-internet-archive-for-systematic-mass-scanning-and-distribution-of-literary-works/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The Internet Archive ended the National Emergency Library on June 16, 2020, instead of the intended June 30 date, and requested the publishers to "call off their costly assault".<ref>{{cite web | url = https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/06/internet-archive-ends-emergency-library-early-to-appease-publishers/ | title = Internet Archive ends "emergency library" early to appease publishers | first = Timothy | last = Lee | date = 2020-06-11 | access-date = 2020-06-14 | work = [[Ars Technica]] | archive-date = 2020-06-14 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200614074641/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/06/internet-archive-ends-emergency-library-early-to-appease-publishers/ | url-status = live }}</ref> In July 2022, both parties filed requests for [[summary judgement]]. A first hearing was held on March 20, 2023.<ref>{{cite web |last=Albanese |first=Andrew |date=February 21, 2023 |url=https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/91587-oral-argument-set-in-internet-archive-copyright-case.html |title=Oral Argument Set in Internet Archive Copyright Case |website=Publishers Weekly |access-date=March 18, 2023 |archive-date=March 18, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230318104026/https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/91587-oral-argument-set-in-internet-archive-copyright-case.html |url-status=live }}</ref> A summary judgement was issued March 24, 2023, in favor of the plaintiffs. In its ruling the [[United States District Court for the Southern District of New York]] determined that the [[Internet Archive]] committed [[copyright infringement]] by scanning and distributing copies of books online. Stemming from the creation of the [[National Emergency Library]] (NEL) during the onset of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], publishing company [[Hachette Book Group]] alleged that the
On March 25, 2023, the court ruled against Internet Archive,
==See also==
Line 62:
{{div col}}
* [[Free-software license]]
* [[Project Gutenberg]]▼
* [[Google Books]]
* [[LibraryThing]]
Line 68 ⟶ 67:
* [[List of digital library projects]]
* [[Online public access catalog]]
▲* [[Project Gutenberg]]
* [[WorldCat]]
{{div col end}}
Line 88:
[[Category:Internet Archive projects]]
[[Category:Internet properties established in 2006]]
[[Category:Software using the GNU
[[Category:Bibliographic databases and indexes]]
[[Category:Library catalogues]]
[[Category:Digital rights management systems]]
| |||