Two-line element set: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 1: change 63-63 to just 63 to match other single column fields
m add missing units-of-measurement to table from the [12] NASA source
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Orbital data format}}
A '''two-line element set''' ('''TLE''', or more rarely '''2LE''') or '''three-line element set''' ('''3LE''') is a [[file format|data format]] encoding a list of [[orbital elements]] of an Earth-orbiting object for a given point in time, the ''epoch''. Using a suitable prediction formula, the [[Orbital state vectors|state]] (position and velocity) at any point in the past or future can be estimated to some accuracy. The TLE data representation is specific to the [[simplified perturbations models]] (SGP, [[SGP4]], [[SDP4]], SGP8 and SDP8), so any algorithm using a TLE as a data source must implement one of the SGP models to correctly compute the state at a time of interest. TLEs can describe the trajectories only of Earth-orbiting objects. TLEs are widely used as input for projecting the future orbital tracks of [[space debris]] for purposes of characterizing "future debris events to support [[risk analysis]], close approach analysis, [[Collision avoidance (spacecraft)|collision avoidance]] maneuvering" and [[forensic analysis]].<ref name=aiaa2008>
{{cite journal |last1=Carrico |first1=Timothy |last2=Carrico |first2=John |last3=Policastri |first3=Lisa |last4=Loucks |first4=Mike |title=Investigating Orbital Debris Events using Numerical Methods with Full Force Model Orbit Propagation |journal=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics |date=2008 |issue=AAS 08–126 |url=http://www.applieddefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2008-Carrico-Policastri-Investigating_Orbital_Debris_Events.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141204122502/http://www.applieddefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/2008-Carrico-Policastri-Investigating_Orbital_Debris_Events.pdf |archive-date=2014-12-04 }}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite web |title=Space-Track.org Basic Description of the Two Line Element (TLE) Format |url=https://www.space-track.org/documentation#/tle |access-date=18 June 2025 |website=www.space-track.org |publisher=[[Combined Force Space Component Command]] |access-date=7 November 2023 |ref=spacetracktle}}</ref>
 
The format was originally intended for [[punch card|punched card]]s, encoding a set of elements on two [[punched card#IBM 80-column format and character codes|standard 80-column cards]]. This format was eventually replaced by [[text file]]s as punch card systems became obsolete, with each set of elements written to two 69-column [[ASCII]] lines preceded by a title line. The [[United States Space Force]] tracks all detectable objects in Earth orbit, creating a corresponding TLE for each object, and makes publicly available TLEs for many of the space objects on the websites Space Track and Celestrak,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.space-track.org/|title=Introduction and sign in to Space-Track.Org|publisher=Space-track.org|access-date=28 November 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://celestrak.com/|title=Celestrak homepage|publisher=Celestrak.com|access-date=28 November 2014}}</ref> holding back or obfuscating data on many military or [[Classified information|classified objects]]. The TLE format is a ''de facto'' standard for distribution of an Earth-orbiting object's orbital elements.
Line 12:
Lane's models were widely used by the military and NASA starting in the late 1960s. The improved version became the standard model for [[NORAD]] in the early 1970s, which ultimately led to the creation of the TLE format. At the time there were two formats designed for [[punch card]]s, an "internal format" that used three cards encoding complete details for the satellite (including name and other data), and the two card "transmission format" that listed only those elements that were subject to change.<ref name=format>{{cite tech report |url=http://celestrak.com/NORAD/documentation/ADCOM%20DO%20Form%2012.pdf |title=ADCOM Form 2012}}</ref> The latter saved on cards and produced smaller decks when updating the databases.
 
Cranford continued to work on the modelling, eventually leading Lane to publish ''Spacetrack Report #2'' detailing the Air Force General Perturbation theory, or AFGP4. The paper also described two simplified versions of the system, IGP4 which used a simplified drag model, and SGP4 (Simplified General Perturbations) which used IGP4's drag model along with a simplified gravity model.<ref name=spacetrack2>{{cite tech report |first1=Max |last=Lane |first2=Felix |last2=Hoots |title=General Perturbations Theories Derived from the 1965 Lane Drag Theory |publisher=Project Space Track, Aerospace Defense Command |date=December 1979 |url=http://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a081264.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150709125624/http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a081264.pdf |url-status=live |archive-date=July 9, 2015 }}</ref> The differences between the three models were slight for most objects. One year later, ''Spacetrack Report #3'' was released, includedincluding full [[FORTRAN]] source code for the SGP4 model.<ref name=spacetrack3>{{cite tech report |first1=Felix |last1=Hoots |first2=Ronald |last2=Roehrich |url=https://celestrak.com/NORAD/documentation/spacetrk.pdf |title=Models for Propagation of NORAD Element Sets |publisher=Project Space Track, Aerospace Defense Command |date=December 1980}}</ref> This quickly became the ''de facto'' standard model, both in the industry as well as the astronomy field.
 
Shortly after the publication of ''Report #3'', NASA began posting elements for a variety of visible and other well known objects in their periodic ''NASA Prediction Bulletins'', which consisted of the transmission format data in printed form. After trying for some time to convince NASA to release these in electronic form, T.S. Kelso took matters into his own hands and began manually copying the listings into text files which he distributed through his [https://celestrak.com CelesTrak] [[bulletin board system]]. This revealed a problem in NASA's [[checksum]] system, which was eventually determined to be caused by a change in the representation of the plus character (+) on punched cards when NORAD upgraded their [[UNIVAC 1100/2200 series|UNIVAC]] computers to use the [[EBCDIC]] character set rather than [[BCD (character encoding)| BCD]]. This problem went away when Kelso began to receive data directly from NORAD in 1989.<ref name=controversy>{{cite web |first=Ted |last=Kelso |title=Two-Line Element Set Checksum Controversy |url=http://celestrak.com/NORAD/documentation/checksum.php |website=CelesTrak |date=January 1992}}</ref>
Line 30:
2 25544 51.6416 247.4627 0006703 130.5360 325.0288 15.72125391563537
 
The meaning of this data is as follows:<ref>{{cite web|urlname=https"://www.space-track.org/documentation#/tle|title=Space Track|publisher=Space-track.org|access-date=28 November0" 2014}}</ref>
 
===Title line (optional)===
Line 74:
||8||21–32||[[Epoch (astronomy)|Epoch]] (day of the year and fractional portion of the day)||264.51782528
|-
||9||34–43||First derivative of [[mean motion]]; the ballistic coefficient (rev/day, per day)<ref name="nasahelp">{{cite web|url=http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/realdata/sightings/SSapplications/Post/JavaSSOP/SSOP_Help/tle_def.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000301052035/http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/realdata/sightings/SSapplications/Post/JavaSSOP/SSOP_Help/tle_def.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=1 March 2000|title=NASA, ''Definition of Two-line Element Set Coordinate System''|publisher=Spaceflight.nasa.gov|access-date=28 November 2014}}</ref>||-.00002182
|-
||10||45–52||Second derivative of [[mean motion]] (rev/day³, decimal point assumed)<ref name="nasahelp" />||00000-0
|-
||11||54–61||[[BSTAR|''B''*]], the drag term, or radiation pressure coefficient (units of 1/(Earth radii), decimal point assumed)<ref name="nasahelp"/>||-11606-4
|-
||12||63||Ephemeris type (always zero; only used in undistributed TLE data)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://celestrak.com/columns/v04n03/|title=CelesTrak: "FAQs: Two-Line Element Set Format" |first=T. S. |last=Kelso |website=celestrak.com|access-date=2019-09-03}}</ref>||0
Line 103:
||3||09–16||[[Orbital inclination|Inclination]] (degrees)||51.6416
|-
||4||18–25||[[Right ascension of the ascending node]] (degrees), in the [[Earth-centered inertial|ECI reference frame]], measured from the [[vernal point]]||247.4627
|-
||5||27–33||[[Orbital eccentricity|Eccentricity]] (unitless, decimal point assumed)||0006703
|-
||6||35–42||[[Argument of perigee]] (degrees)||130.5360
Line 124:
For a body in a typical [[low Earth orbit]], the accuracy that can be obtained with the SGP4 orbit model is on the order of 1&nbsp;km within a few days of the epoch of the element set.<ref>{{cite web|last=Kelso |first=T.S.|title=Validation of SGP4 and IS-GPS-200D Against GPS Precision Ephemerides|quote=AAS paper 07-127, presented at the 17th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Conference, Sedona, Arizona|date=29 January 2007|url=http://celestrak.com/publications/AAS/07-127/|publisher=Celestrak.com|access-date=28 November 2014}}</ref> The term "low orbit" may refer to either the altitude (minimal or global) or orbital period of the body. Historically, the SGP algorithms defines low orbit as an orbit of less than 225 minutes.
 
TwoIn two-digit Epoch Years, fromthe 57years to1957 99through correspond1999 toare 1957–1999represented andby thosethe numbers 57 through 99. Numbers from 00 to 56 correspondrepresent tothe years 2000–2056.<ref>{{cite web |title=Frequently Asked Questions: Two-Line Element Set Format |last=Kelso |first=T.S. |publisher=CelesTrak |url=https://celestrak.com/columns/v04n03/}}</ref>
 
The activation of the [[Space Fence]] in 2020 resulted in a great increase in the number of objects being tracked as the Space Fence's [[S-band]] RADAR is more sensitive than the radars used by the [[Air Force Space Surveillance System]] that previously had generated the raw data used for TLEs.<ref name="CelesTrak"/> The increase in the number of objects tracked meant that [[Satellite Catalog Number]]s may no longer fit in the five-digit field available in traditional TLEs. A secondary cause for the increase in Satellite Catalog Numbers was the commercialization of space and break-up events and collisions that have created debris objects.<ref name="CelesTrak"/> Adaptations of the TLE were considered to extend the number of encodable Satellites within the TLE but instead a new format, the [[CCSDS]] OMM (Orbit Mean-Elements Message), started being used in 2020 that supports nine-digit Satellite Catalog Numbers. The legacy TLE format will continue to use five-digit Satellite Catalog Numbers.<ref name="CelesTrak">{{Cite web|title=CelesTrak: A New Way to Obtain GP Data|url=https://celestrak.com/NORAD/documentation/gp-data-formats.php|access-date=2020-07-29|website=celestrak.com}}</ref>
 
As a stop-gap measure for systems which can only take in five characters for the Satellite Catalog number, the Space Force developed the "Alpha-5" numbering scheme, where the highest digit can be replaced with an alphabetical character to represent higher numbers from 100000–339999. The letters "I" and "O" are skipped to avoid confusion with the numbers "1" and "0". For example, the number 100000 can be represented as "A0000" in the Alpha-5 format, 110000 is represented by "B0000", up to the highest number 339999 which is represented as "Z9999". However, using the nine-digit Satellite Catalog number is preferred.<ref name=":0" />
 
==References==