Module talk:Protected edit request: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:33, 22 September 2023

Latest revision as of 19:50, 4 August 2025

(20 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Permanently protected}}

{{Talk header|archive_age=90|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{atnhead|noredlinks=y}}

Line 10:

|archive = Module talk:Protected edit request/Archive %(counter)d

}}

== On mobile ==

Can this please be made visible on mobile? There's no good reason for it not being visible. [[User:Hairy Dude|Hairy Dude]] ([[User talk:Hairy Dude|talk]]) 14:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

== "Error: Protected edit requests can only be made on the talk page." error ==

Line 31 ⟶ 27:

:: {{Done}} Passing {{para|skiptalk|yes}} now overrides that check. I also removed the check for being on RFPP (part of an idea of mine to merge [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit]] with the edit request template process that turned out not to work and was abandoned), and fixed a longstanding bug where {{tlx|edit protected|demo=yes|answered=yes}} on a non-talk page caused an error. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 16:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

== Text for template-protected ==

== How to add 'editautoreviewprotected' level to a test copy of this module? ==

Can the text for {{tl|edit template-protected}} be enhanced to mention using {{tl|ETp}} for responses? For example, {{tl|edit semi-protected}} currently displays {{tqq|You may also wish to use the {{tl|ESp}} template in the response.}}.—[[User:Bagumba|Bagumba]] ([[User talk:Bagumba|talk]]) 04:03, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

== Template-protected edit request on 4 August 2025 ==

{{edit template-protected|Module:Protected edit request|answered=yes}}

When an edit request is either answered or not answered AND the parameter used in the underlying wikitext for that particular request is {{para|ans}} and not {{para|answered}}, the texts in the two boxes currently say:

(when not answered:)

[...] To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection|protection request]]. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the <code><nowiki>|</nowiki>answered=''yes''</code> parameter to deactivate the template.

(when answered:)

This [[Wikipedia:Edit requests|edit request]] has been answered. Set the <code><nowiki>|</nowiki>answered=</code> parameter to '''no''' to reactivate your request.

----

Hello everybody! I'm trying to implement this module in ptwiki (in a test space). It worked, but there we have a level of protection that the module does not deal with: that of autoreviewers (autoreview). The only tip I understood was the error that returns informing "not knowing the 'editautoreviewprotected' level".

I think they should be changed to say:

(when answered:)

Everything worked after translation and I would like to add the mentioned protection level.

This [[Wikipedia:Edit requests|edit request]] has been answered. Set the <code><nowiki>|</nowiki>ans=</code> parameter to '''no''' to reactivate your request.

(when not answered:)

I didn't understand some lines of code, because I'm not a programmer yet (I'm self-taught), and I would like to know if it will be necessary to edit "Module:Effective protection level" as well.

[...] To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection|protection request]]. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the <code><nowiki>|</nowiki>ans=''yes''</code> parameter to deactivate the template.

[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:02, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Can anyone guide me regarding the necessary modifications for this purpose? If anyone, calmly and patiently, can teach or guide me, I will be very grateful and will implement it there. Grateful for the attention and have a nice week! [[User:Gkiyoshinishimoto|Nishimoto, Gilberto Kiyoshi]] ([[User talk:Gkiyoshinishimoto|talk]]) 21:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

: This feels like a lot of extra effort for not much value to me. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 14:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

::{{not done}}. Using {{para|answered}} instead of its short alias, {{para|ans}}, is more reader-friendly. – [[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] ([[User talk:Jonesey95|talk]]) 17:27, 4 August 2025 (UTC)