How should the nomination categories at [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations]] be sorted?
*'''Option 1''': by age, with oldest nominations at the top of sections and newest nominations at the bottom (the pre-2023 system).
*'''Option 2''': by the nominator's ratio of reviews to nominations, with higher ratios placed at top and lower ratios at bottom (the current system, adopted after [[Wikipedia talk:Good Article proposal drive 2023#Proposal 9: Change sort order of GAN page to prioritize frequent reviewers|the proposal drive in early 2023]]).
*'''Option 3''': as at option 2, but with the ratio calculated using only reviews and nominations from within the previous 18 months (an adaptation of the current system [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations&diff=prev&oldid=1209057911 proposed above] by [[User:Mike Christie]]).
[[User:AirshipJungleman29|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 04:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)}}
'''[[Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates#rfc_7593DF3|Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates]]'''
{{rfcquote|text=
Should the leads of [[WP:DOY|Days Of the Year (DOY) articles]] be expanded to comply with [[MOS:LEADLENGTH]]/[[WP:FLCR]] or should those policies be modified to [[Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates#February_8|create an exception]] for DOY articles per the [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Days_of_the_year#Expanding_DOY_article_leads|apparent consensus against changing DOY leads]]?
[[User:Dantheanimator|Dan]] [[User talk:Dantheanimator|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Dantheanimator|Animator]] 01:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)}}
{{RFC list footer|proj|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}
