Content deleted Content added
Guy Harris (talk | contribs) The older text was more readable. Dropping support for particular *Intel* processors is not relevant to an article discussing the switch *to* Intel processors. |
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#anandtech.com |
||
| (47 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
{{About|Apple's transition of its Mac computers from the PowerPC architecture to Intel processors|details on the architecture of Intel-based Apple computers|Apple–Intel architecture}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2013}}
{{AppleIntel}}
{{macOS sidebar}}
The
Apple's initial press release
The final version of
In 2020, Apple announced that it would [[Mac transition to Apple silicon|shift its Mac line to Apple silicon]], which are [[ARM architecture|ARM]]-based
==Background==
Line 28 ⟶ 27:
==History==
===1980s===
Apple's efforts to move to Intel hardware began in 1985.
===1990s===
In the 1990s, Intel often took out ads in ''[[Macworld]]'' convincing Macintosh users to switch to PCs powered by Intel CPUs.<ref>{{cite magazine | url=https://archive.org/details/MacWorld_9312_December_1993/page/n3/mode/2up | title=Intel advertisement |magazine=[[MacWorld]] | date=December 1993 }}</ref>
The first known attempt by Apple to move to Intel's platform was the [[Star Trek project]], a code name given to a secret project to run a port of [[Classic Mac OS]] [[System 7]] and its applications on an Intel-compatible personal computer.<ref name="LowEndMac1"/> The effort began on February 14, 1992, with the blessing of Intel's then-CEO [[Andy Grove]].<ref name="LowEndMac1"/>▼
▲The first known attempt by Apple to move to Intel's platform was the [[Star Trek project]], a code name given to a secret project to run a port of [[Classic Mac OS]] [[System 7]] and its applications on an Intel-compatible personal computer.
Apple leaders set an October 31 deadline to create a working prototype. The team met that deadline, and had a functional demo ready by December. [[John Sculley]]'s departure during the Star Trek project was a factor in the project's termination. [[Michael Spindler]], who took over as Apple's CEO, devoted most of Apple's resources to moving to PowerPC instead,<ref name="LowEndMac1"/> thus initiating Apple's first processor transition.▼
▲Apple leaders set an October 31 deadline to create a working prototype. The team met that deadline, and had a functional demo ready by December. [[John Sculley]]'s departure during the Star Trek project was a factor in the project's termination. [[Michael Spindler]], who took over as Apple's CEO, instead devoted most of Apple's resources to
After Apple's 1997 acquisition of [[NeXT]], Apple began to rework their [[NeXTSTEP]] operating system into a successor to the classic Mac OS, codenamed [[Rhapsody (operating system)|Rhapsody]]. Jobs (who rejoined Apple upon the purchase) demonstrated an Intel-compatible build of Rhapsody to [[Dell]] founder and namesake [[Michael Dell]]. Jobs offered to license the new OS to Dell for its PCs, so that users could choose between it and [[Microsoft Windows|Windows]]. However, Dell declined when Jobs insisted that the company license the operating system for every PC it ships, regardless of whether or not the user wanted to use Mac OS.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Guglielmo|first=Connie|title=The Apple-Dell deal that could have changed history|url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/the-steve-jobs-deal-with-dell-that-could-have-changed-apple-and-tech-history/|access-date=2021-10-29|website=CNET|language=en|archive-date=October 29, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211029173341/https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/the-steve-jobs-deal-with-dell-that-could-have-changed-apple-and-tech-history/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Line 46 ⟶ 47:
It was noted in 2003 by IBM in an article published to its [[intranet]] that Apple felt a transition to Intel would present massive software changes that it wanted to avoid.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kim |first1=Arnold |title=IBM on Apple/Intel and the G5 |url=https://www.macrumors.com/2003/09/12/ibm-on-apple-intel-and-the-g5/ |access-date=24 June 2020 |work=[[MacRumors]] |date=12 September 2003 |archive-date=October 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201020005737/https://www.macrumors.com/2003/09/12/ibm-on-apple-intel-and-the-g5/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Nevertheless, rumors of an impending announcement of a transition to Intel cropped up in 2000 and 2003.<ref name="MacRumors1">{{cite news |last1=Kim |first1=Arnold |title='Intel Based Mac' Rumor Roundup... [Updated x2] |url=https://www.macrumors.com/2005/06/05/intel-based-mac-rumor-roundup/ |access-date=25 June 2020 |work=[[MacRumors]] |date=4 June 2005 |archive-date=October 31, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201031220502/https://www.macrumors.com/2005/06/05/intel-based-mac-rumor-roundup/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Sculley said in 2003 that not choosing Intel for Apple was "probably one of the biggest mistakes I've ever made". Apple did not foresee Intel's ability to improve x86's [[complex instruction set computing|CISC]] architecture to match [[RISC]], and did not have access to commodity x86 components to compete on price with rivals like [[Dell]], he said.<ref name="forbes20031009">{{Cite magazine |date=2003-10-09 |title=Ex-Apple CEO Regrets Nixing Intel |url=https://www.forbes.com/2003/10/09/1009intelpinnacor.html |access-date=2025-06-28 |magazine=Forbes |language=en}}</ref>
===2005===
Line 58 ⟶ 61:
Some observers expressed surprise that Apple made a deal with Intel instead of with [[AMD]].<ref name="MacWorld1">{{cite news |last1=McLaughlin |first1=Laurianne |title=Analysis: Why Apple picked Intel over AMD |url=https://www.macworld.com/article/1046961/intelvsamd.html |access-date=24 June 2020 |work=[[MacWorld]] |date=14 September 2005 |archive-date=October 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201024040545/https://www.macworld.com/article/1046961/intelvsamd.html |url-status=live }}</ref> By 2005, AMD had become popular with gamers and the budget conscious,<ref name="MacWorld1"/> but some analysts believed AMD's lack of low-power designs at the time was behind Apple's decision to go with Intel.<ref name="MacWorld1"/>
In 2011, Apple investigated using AMD's low power [[AMD Fusion#Llano .2832.C2.A0nm.29 2|Llano APU]] for the [[MacBook Air]], but eventually opted for Intel due to AMD's potential inability to supply enough Llano processors to meet demand.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.semiaccurate.com/2011/11/17/apple-macbook-air-with-amd-processor-dead/ |title=Exclusive: Apple MacBook Air with AMD processor dead |date=2011-11-17 |publisher=[[SemiAccurate]] |access-date=December 31, 2012 |archive-date=January 31, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130131005152/http://www.semiaccurate.com/2011/11/17/apple-macbook-air-with-amd-processor-dead/#.UQnAMC_P32c |url-status=live }}</ref>
===32-bit regression===
Line 69 ⟶ 72:
At the time the transition was announced, it was noted that a degree of enmity towards Intel exists amongst some fans of Apple products, due to Intel's close identification with Microsoft.<ref name="SanJoseMercuryNews1">{{cite news |last1=Chmielewski |first1=Dawn |title=2005: Changing Apple"s core — Jobs says Intel chips will replace IBM in Macintosh beginning next summer |url=https://www.montereyherald.com/2015/03/04/2005-changing-apples-core-jobs-says-intel-chips-will-replace-ibm-in-macintosh-beginning-next-summer/ |access-date=24 June 2020 |work=[[The Mercury News|San Jose Mercury News]] (via [[The Monterey County Herald|Monterey Herald]]) |date=7 June 2005 |archive-date=November 10, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201110001518/https://www.montereyherald.com/2015/03/04/2005-changing-apples-core-jobs-says-intel-chips-will-replace-ibm-in-macintosh-beginning-next-summer/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In addition, It was noted by Intel's then CEO, [[Paul Otellini]], that Apple and Intel's relationship was strained at times, especially due to Apple's commission of an ad that shows Intel processors being outperformed by PowerPC processors.<ref name="SanJoseMercuryNews1"/>
While there were questions over whether Apple would put the [[Intel Inside]] stickers on its products, Jobs dispelled such a possibility, saying it is redundant when Apple's use of Intel processors is well-known.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Pot |first1=Justin |title=Why Don't Macs Have "Intel Inside" Stickers? |url=https://www.howtogeek.com/318892/why-dont-macs-have-intel-inside-stickers/ |website=How-To Geek |access-date=23 June 2020 |date=24 July 2017 |archive-date=November 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201127001940/https://www.howtogeek.com/318892/why-dont-macs-have-intel-inside-stickers/ |url-status=live }}</ref> "Intel Inside" stickers have never been included on any Apple product.<ref>{{cite magazine | url=https://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2007/08/apple-fan-frenz/ | magazine=Wired | first=Charlie | last=Sorrel | title=Apple Fan Frenzy: Stickergate | date=August 13, 2007 | access-date=March 5, 2017 | archive-date=March 3, 2014 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140303092956/http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2007/08/apple-fan-frenz/ | url-status=live }}</ref>
===Osborne
There was concern that an early announcement of the change would cause an [[Osborne effect]],<ref>{{cite news |last1=Andrew |first1=Orlowski |title=The Osborne Effect spooks Apple |url=https://www.theregister.com/2005/06/08/apple_osborne_effect/ |access-date=23 June 2020 |work=[[The Register]] |date=8 June 2005 |archive-date=November 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201124174343/https://www.theregister.com/2005/06/08/apple_osborne_effect/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Cooper |first1=Charles |title=Apple and the "Osborne Effect" |url=https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-and-the-osborne-effect/ |access-date=23 June 2020 |work=[[CNet]] |date=14 July 2005 |archive-date=June 25, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200625113437/https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-and-the-osborne-effect/ |url-status=live }}</ref> but it
Analysis of financial data suggests that the Osborne Effect did not materialize, with sales for Macs growing by 19% and 37% in the two quarters following March 2006.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gassée |first1=Jean-Louis |title=Osborning The Mac. Or Not. |url=https://mondaynote.com/osborning-the-mac-or-not-f0bbf4c319f0 |website=Monday Note |access-date=23 June 2020 |date=14 June 2020 |archive-date=June 14, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200614220541/https://mondaynote.com/osborning-the-mac-or-not-f0bbf4c319f0 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Line 79 ⟶ 82:
The [[Classic environment]], the [[Mac OS 9]] virtualization measure for Mac OS X, was not ported to the x86 architecture,<ref>{{cite web |title=Why doesn't Apple support MacOS 9/Classic on Intel-based Macs? |url=https://everymac.com/mac-answers/mac-os-9-classic-support-faq/why-did-apple-abandon-macos-9-classic.html |website=EveryMac.com |access-date=23 June 2020 |date=12 July 2006 |archive-date=April 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190403193212/https://everymac.com/mac-answers/mac-os-9-classic-support-faq/why-did-apple-abandon-macos-9-classic.html |url-status=live }}</ref> leaving the new Intel-powered Macs incompatible with [[classic Mac OS]] applications without a proper third-party PowerPC emulator.
There were also concerns over third-party software support, with reaction to the change being mixed amongst the software developer community, due to a need to recompile software for compatibility on Intel-based Macs.<ref name="SanJoseMercuryNews1"/> In early 2006, it was reported that a number of software companies, such as [[Adobe Inc.|Adobe]], [[Aspyr]] and [[Microsoft]], were not ready to release [[universal binary]] versions of their software offerings.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Shimpi |first1=Shimpi |title=Apple Makes the Switch: iMac G5 vs. iMac Core Duo |url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/1936 |access-date=24 June 2020 |work=AnandTech |date=30 January 2006 |archive-date=July 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726071220/https://www.anandtech.com/show/1936 |url-status=
===Technical issues===
Line 108 ⟶ 111:
===Ongoing support for PowerPC following transition===
[[Mac OS X Snow Leopard|Mac OS X Snow Leopard (10.6)]], released in August 2009, was the first version of Mac OS X (later [[macOS]]) to require a Mac with an Intel processor, ending operating system support for
Apple has a policy of placing products that have not been sold for more than five years, but less than seven years, as "vintage", meaning hardware services from Apple Stores and service providers are subject to availability of inventory, or as required by law.
In spite of the PowerPC
==Legacy==
Line 121 ⟶ 124:
==Timeline==
*June 6, 2005: Apple announced its plans to switch to Intel processors at the [[WWDC|Worldwide Developer Conference]] and released a Developer Transition System, a PC running an Intel build of Mac OS X 10.4.1 in a modified [[Power Mac G5]] case, to all Select and Premier members of the Apple Developer Connection at a price of $999.<ref name="apple-pr-2005"/><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://vintagemacmuseum.com/the-apple-developer-transition-system-a-trojan-horse-powermac/|title=The Apple Developer Transition System – a Trojan Horse PowerMac|website=The Vintage Mac Museum|access-date=November 7, 2017|archive-date=November 7, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107111936/http://vintagemacmuseum.com/the-apple-developer-transition-system-a-trojan-horse-powermac/|url-status=live}}</ref>
* January 10, 2006: Jobs announced the first two computers in this series, the 15" [[MacBook Pro]], the first laptop to support [[SATA]], and [[iMac|iMac Core Duo]] line, both using an [[Intel Core|Intel Core Duo]] chip and offered to trade in the Developer Transition Kits for iMacs.
* February 28, 2006: Jobs announced that the [[Mac mini]] now also comes with [[SATA]] connection and an [[Intel Core]] chip, in either the Solo or Duo varieties.
* April 5, 2006: Apple announced the release of '''[[Boot Camp (software)|Boot Camp]]''', which allowed users of Intel-based Macs to run [[Windows XP]]<ref>{{cite web|website=[[BBC News]]|date=April 5, 2006|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4880022.stm|title=Apple makes Macs run Windows XP|access-date=April 5, 2006|archive-date=April 9, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060409112301/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4880022.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> (later versions of Boot Camp allow later versions of Windows).
* April 24, 2006: Apple announced the 17" MacBook Pro, replacing the 17" [[PowerBook]].
* April 27, 2006: Intel announced that processors with the [[Core (microarchitecture)|Core microarchitecture]] would be released months sooner than previously thought.
* May 16, 2006: Apple announced the 13" [[MacBook]] with [[SATA]] support, replacing both the [[iBook]] line and the 12" PowerBook.
* June 26, 2006: Intel announced the [[Xeon#Dual-Core Xeon|Xeon 5100 series]] server/workstation CPU.<ref>{{cite web|website=[[MacWorld]]|date=June 26, 2006|url=https://www.macworld.com/article/1051533/woodcrest.html|title=Intel rolls out 'Woodcrest' chip|first=Shelley|last=Solheim|access-date=November 20, 2019|archive-date=June 28, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190628202944/https://www.macworld.com/article/1051533/woodcrest.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
* July 5, 2006: Apple announced a special educational configuration of the [[iMac]], replacing the old [[PowerPC G4|G4]] [[eMac]].
* August 7, 2006: "Transition Complete" - Apple announced the Intel-based [[Mac Pro]] and [[Xserve]], replacing the [[Power Mac G5]] and Xserve G5, at the [[Worldwide Developers Conference]]; both use the Xeon 5100 series ("[[Woodcrest (microprocessor)|Woodcrest]]") processors.<ref name="MacTransitionComplete" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":0" />
* October 26, 2007: Apple shipped [[Mac OS X Leopard|Mac OS X 10.5]] "Leopard", the final release with PowerPC support. Macs using a [[PowerPC 7xx|G3]] processor cannot boot this operating system as the backwards
* August 28, 2009: Apple shipped Mac OS X 10.6 "Snow Leopard" exclusively for Intel Macs. PowerPC Macs cannot boot this OS as the backwards
* March 1, 2011: The beta version of the then-upcoming [[Mac OS X Lion]]
* June 23, 2011: Support for Mac OS 10.5 Leopard came to a end, formally ending Apple's support of PowerPC hardware on Mac OS X.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9244852/Apple_signals_end_to_OS_X_Snow_Leopard_support|title=Apple signals end to OS X Snow Leopard support|quote=Apple provided the final update to Leopard in June 2011|first=Gregg |last=Keizer|date=December 17, 2013|website=[[Computerworld]]|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140407021432/http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9244852/Apple_signals_end_to_OS_X_Snow_Leopard_support|archive-date=April 7, 2014|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9246609/Apple_retires_Snow_Leopard_from_support_leaves_1_in_5_Macs_vulnerable_to_attacks |title=Apple retires Snow Leopard from support, leaves 1 in 5 Macs vulnerable to attacks |first=Gregg |last=Keizer |date= February 26, 2014 |website=[[Computerworld]] |access-date=2014-05-09 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140528150522/http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9246609/Apple_retires_Snow_Leopard_from_support_leaves_1_in_5_Macs_vulnerable_to_attacks |archive-date=May 28, 2014 |df=mdy-all }} See the graph picture on the web</ref>
* July 20, 2011: The release of Mac OS X 10.7 Lion formally ended Apple's
* August 7, 2011: PowerPC hardware reached "vintage" status having been discontinued five years prior, ending most of Apple's service and parts support for PowerPC hardware.
* June 11, 2012: Apple released iTunes 10.6.3, their last application with support for PowerPC processors.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://support.apple.com/kb/dl1575?locale=en_US|title=iTunes 10.6.3|website=support.apple.com|access-date=November 20, 2019|archive-date=January 25, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210125061255/https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1575?locale=en_US|url-status=live}}</ref>
* August 7, 2013: PowerPC hardware reached "obsolete" status having been discontinued seven years
* February 25, 2014: Support for Mac OS 10.6 Snow Leopard was dropped, formally ending Apple's support of PowerPC-based software.
==See also==
Line 143 ⟶ 147:
* [[Star Trek project]]
* [[Universal binary]]
* [[Mac transition to PowerPC processors]]
* [[Mac transition to Apple silicon]]
Line 153 ⟶ 158:
== External links ==
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20090301215628/http://developer.apple.com:80/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/universal_binary/ Apple Universal Binary Programming Guidelines]
* [
* [https://www.apple.com/macosx/compatibility/ Boot Camp, Apple's solution to running Windows operating systems via a dual-boot method]
{{Intel}}
| |||