Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Mike_Harrison113 (talk) (HG) (3.4.12) |
LucasBrown (talk | contribs) Changing short description from "In computer programming, statement that a predicate is always true at that point in code execution" to "Statement that a predicate is always true at that point in code execution" |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
{{About|the computer programming concept|assertions in the context of the [[Security Assertion Markup Language]] (SAML) open standard|Security Assertion Markup Language#Assertions}}
Line 9:
The following code contains two assertions, <code>x > 0</code> and <code>x > 1</code>, and they are indeed true at the indicated points during execution:
<syntaxhighlight lang="
x = 1;
assert x > 0;
Line 18:
Programmers can use assertions to help specify programs and to reason about program correctness. For example, a [[precondition]]—an assertion placed at the beginning of a section of code—determines the set of states under which the programmer expects the code to execute. A [[postcondition]]—placed at the end—describes the expected state at the end of execution. For example: <code>x > 0 { x++ } x > 1</code>.
The example above uses the notation for including assertions used by [[C. A. R. Hoare]] in his 1969 article.<ref>[[C. A. R. Hoare]], [http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1912 An axiomatic basis for computer programming], ''[[Communications of the ACM]]'', 1969.</ref> That notation cannot be used in existing mainstream programming languages. However, programmers can include unchecked assertions using the [[Comment (computer programming)|comment feature]] of their programming language. For example, in [[C
<syntaxhighlight lang="
x = 5;
x = x + 1;
Line 30:
[[Library (computing)|Libraries]] may provide assertion features as well. For example, in C using [[glibc]] with C99 support:
<syntaxhighlight lang="
#include <assert.h>
Line 60:
<syntaxhighlight lang="java">
</syntaxhighlight>
Line 122:
Most languages allow assertions to be enabled or disabled globally, and sometimes independently. Assertions are often enabled during development and disabled during final testing and on release to the customer. Not checking assertions avoids the cost of evaluating the assertions while (assuming the assertions are free of [[Side-effect (computer science)|side effects]]) still producing the same result under normal conditions. Under abnormal conditions, disabling assertion checking can mean that a program that would have aborted will continue to run. This is sometimes preferable.
Some languages, including [[C (programming language)|C]], [[ZPE_Programming_Environment|YASS]] and [[C++]], can completely remove assertions at compile time using the [[preprocessor]].
Similarly, launching the [[Python (programming language)|Python]] interpreter with "{{Mono|-O}}" (for "optimize") as an argument will cause the Python code generator to not emit any bytecode for asserts.<ref>[https://docs.python.org/3/reference/simple_stmts.html#grammar-token-assert-stmt Official Python Docs, ''assert statement'']</ref>
Java requires an option to be passed to the run-time engine in order to ''enable'' assertions. Absent the option, assertions are bypassed, but they always remain in the code unless optimised away by a [[Just-in-time compilation|JIT compiler]] at run-time or [[dead_code_elimination|excluded at compile time]] via the programmer manually placing each assertion behind an <code>if (false)</code> clause.
Programmers can build checks into their code that are always active by bypassing or manipulating the language's normal assertion-checking mechanisms.
Line 137:
<syntaxhighlight lang="c">
</syntaxhighlight>
Line 150:
<syntaxhighlight lang="c">
</syntaxhighlight>
Line 183:
* ''[http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/4991/1/4991.pdf A historical perspective on runtime assertion checking in software development]'' by Lori A. Clarke, David S. Rosenblum in: ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 31(3):25-37, 2006
* ''[
* ''[http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2220317 My Compiler Does Not Understand Me]'' by Poul-Henning Kamp in: ACM Queue 10(5), May 2012
* ''[https://blog.regehr.org/archives/1091 Use of Assertions]'' by John Regehr
|