Talk:Object-oriented modeling: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 24:
I re-used some text I wrote for a related article: [[Object-Oriented Analysis and Design]] I think by the time I was done editing almost none of the original text was left, but I think it's a policy that you document when you do that so I am doing so. Obviously the two topics are highly related. [[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 17:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 
:I just removed the OOM detail info from OOAD article and merged it into this article. I suspect that what I merged is the stuff you mention here. TheyThe content in the two articles was very similar yet rather different too. I think the info was copied (forked) and then modified over the years. IMO no point pointhaving duplicate info and OOM has its own article so we should include detail about it here rather than in some other article. OOAD now references OOM, but does dive into details about it. [[User:Stevebroshar|Stevebroshar]] ([[User talk:Stevebroshar|talk]]) 13:23, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
 
== Removed merge proposal ==
 
There was a proposal to merge the article object-modeling language into this one. It had been up for a year with no support and I disagreed with it for reasons documented so after revising the object modeling language article I decided to remove it. [[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 14:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 
:I do think that object-modeling language should merged into this article (OOM). [[User:Stevebroshar|Stevebroshar]] ([[User talk:Stevebroshar|talk]]) 15:31, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
 
== Merge into OOAD proposal ==