Content deleted Content added
→Explaining what the DOM is without being vague: Adding comment and editing bad breakup of section |
Gnomingstuff (talk | contribs) rv 2009 nonsenes |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Mid}}
}}
== VTD-XML is not spam ==
Line 77 ⟶ 78:
Need some simple examples, like "here is a nutcracker, see how it cracks a nut", etc. [[User:Jidanni|Jidanni]] ([[User talk:Jidanni|talk]]) 20:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
:that would define original interpretation of what u searching and would help users to d copies. you cand do that in foirums but i order to read it u must do screen captures.
can someone guide next an wp editor proceed & upload printscreens?paul80
Line 163:
you could say '''DOM Level 0 coprises part of html4''' that way users would use _full html_ in version4, and even more programmers would migrate tro hyml4 and html5 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/188.25.110.232|188.25.110.232]] ([[User talk:188.25.110.232|talk]]) 02:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== this article can use LEVEL-1, LEVEL-2, LEVEL-3 as sections ==
why not?
== DOM for SGML? ==
The article mentions that the Document Object Model (DOM) "treats an [[HTML]], [[XHTML]], or [[XML]] document as a tree structure." What about [[SGML]]? Doesn't the DOM treats SGML documents? Since both HTML and XML are extended from SGML, and XHTML is extended from XML and HTML, perhaps we should mention SGML in the article and – if it isn't treated by the DOM – explain why it isn't. —[[User:Kri|Kri]] ([[User talk:Kri|talk]]) 07:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
| |||