Wikipedia:Don't edit for power: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Xanchester (talk | contribs) added Category:Wikipedia essays on administration using HotCat |
stick to one style instead of two |
||
(32 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Essay|WP:POWER}}
{{nutshell|Don't edit
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia where we work together, and of course we need admins to [[
== What happens when they get power ==
Let's say these power
Eventually, they will get bored of even being on
▲Let's say these power hunting users go up for [[WP:RFA|RFA]] and succeed, they gain the supposed power that they have only edited wikipedia for. These users will possibly now just scrap writing articles and improving them also scrapping any other kind of encyclopedia based work, and obviously they will use the tools and only the tools!
▲Eventually they will get bored of even being on wikipedia, bearing in mind they weren't bored when they were busy writing articles and improving everything to get the admin job, and most of these kinds of users will just abandon their admin account. Just for some [[WP:VAND|vandal]] to compromise it 2 years later and wreak havoc with these admin tools. Which is one reason you shouldn't just edit to look for power. However under some cases this doesn't happen, and this situation is a rare one.
==What happens when they don't get power...==
Let's say an average user who is hunting for power on Wikipedia goes up for [[WP:
==Are all admins looking for power then?==
No, not all admins on
==See also==
* [[Wikipedia:Misuse of administrator tools]]
* [[Wikipedia:Disruptive sanctions]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiBullying]]
* [[Wikipedia:Hat collecting]]
[[Category:Wikipedia essays explaining processes]]
[[Category:Wikipedia essays
|