Plain Old XML: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 20:22, 3 January 2025 edit Meno25 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 216,392 edits update link ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 04:12, 10 August 2025 edit undo Chris the speller (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 894,223 edits m →top: replaced: strictly-defined → strictly defined Tag: AWB
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 5: POX is complementary to [[REST]]: REST refers to a communication pattern, while POX refers to an information format style. The primary competitors to POX are more strictly- defined XML-based information formats such as [[Resource Description Framework\|RDF]] and [[SOAP (protocol)\|SOAP section 5 encoding]], as well as general non-XML information formats such as [[JSON]] and [[Comma-separated values\|CSV]]. ==External links== Line 11: [http://microformats.org/wiki/plain-old-xml-considered-harmful Plain Old XML Considered Harmful] from Microformats.org [http://static.springsource.org/spring-ws/sites/1.5/apidocs/org/springframework/ws/pox/package-summary.html Support for POX] in the Java Spring Framework *[~~http~~https://sourceforge.net/projects/plainxml/ PlainXML on SourceForge.net] [[Category:XML]]