Passive sampling: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
OAbot (talk | contribs)
m Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot.
OAbot (talk | contribs)
m Open access bot: hdl updated in citation with #oabot.
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 12:
*[[Antibiotic]]s<ref name = DGT />
*[[Bisphenol]]s<ref name = DGT />
*[[DioxinDioxins and dioxin-like compounds|Dioxins]]s<ref name = POCISSPMD />
*[[Flame retardant]]s<ref name = POCISSPMD />
*[[Furan]]s<ref name = POCISSPMD />
Line 27:
==Passive sampling in water==
 
Several kinds of passive sampling devices exist for monitoring pollutants present in water. In addition to these devices, organisms, such as [[mussel]]s, living in the environment also "passively sample" contaminants ([[bioaccumulation]]) and can be used to monitor water pollution ([[Aquatic biomonitoring|biomonitoring]]).<ref name="Mussel">{{cite journal |last1=Sericano |first1=JL |last2=Wade |first2=TL |last3=Jackson |first3=TJ |last4=Brooks |first4=JM |last5=Tripp |first5=BW |last6=Farrington |first6=JW |last7=Mee |first7=LD |last8=Readmann |first8=JW |last9=Villeneuve |first9=JP |last10=Goldberg |first10=ED |title=Trace Organic Contamination in the Americas: An Overview of the US National Status & Trends and the International 'Mussel Watch' Programmes |journal=Marine Pollution Bulletin |date=1995 |volume=31 |issue=4–12|pages=214–225 |doi=10.1016/0025-326X(95)00197-U |bibcode=1995MarPB..31..214S }}</ref>
 
===Chemcatcher===
Line 35:
===Diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT)===
{{Main|Diffusive gradients in thin films}}
Diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) samplers passively sample [[ion]]ic trace metals, as well as [[antibiotic]]s, [[oxyanion]]s, [[bisphenol]]s, and [[nanoparticle]]s in different configurations. They are composed of plastic pistons and caps, with a window that exposes a binding gel, diffusive gel, and filter membrane to the sampling water. They can be used in both freshwater and marine environments, as well as in the water located between freshwater and marine [[sediment]] particles, called ''pore water'' or ''interstitial water''. Once the mass of accumulated contaminants on the DGT sampler is known, the DGT equation (based on [[Fick's law]]) can be used to calculate the time averaged water concentration of contaminants.<ref name="DGT">{{cite journal |last1=Zhang |first1=Chaosheng |last2=Ding |first2=Shiming |last3=Xu |first3=Di |last4=Tang |first4=Ya |last5=Wong |first5=Ming H |title=Bioavailability assessment of phosphorus and metals in soils and sediments: a review of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) |journal=Environmental Monitoring and Assessment |date=2014 |volume=186 |issue=11|pages=7367–7378 |doi=10.1007/s10661-014-3933-0 |pmid=25015347 |bibcode=2014EMnAs.186.7367Z |s2cid=25854461 }}</ref>
 
=== Microporous polyethylene tubes (MPT) ===
Microporous polyethylene tubes (MPT) attempt to mitigate the flow-dependency of other kinetic passive samplers such as Chemcatcher and POCIS by introducing a thicker membrane.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Fauvelle|first1=Vincent|last2=Kaserzon|first2=Sarit L.|last3=Montero|first3=Natalia|last4=Lissalde|first4=Sophie|last5=Allan|first5=Ian J.|last6=Mills|first6=Graham|last7=Mazzella|first7=Nicolas|last8=Mueller|first8=Jochen F.|last9=Booij|first9=Kees|date=2017-03-07|title=Dealing with Flow Effects on the Uptake of Polar Compounds by Passive Samplers|url=https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00558|journal=Environmental Science & Technology|volume=51|issue=5|pages=2536–2537|doi=10.1021/acs.est.7b00558|pmid=28225255|bibcode=2017EnST...51.2536F|s2cid=206567423 |issn=0013-936X|doi-access=free}}</ref> The diffusive polyethylene layer prevents the thickness of the water-boundary layer (which is affected by flow) from dominating diffusion.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last1=Fauvelle|first1=Vincent|last2=Montero|first2=Natalia|last3=Mueller|first3=Jochen F.|last4=Banks|first4=Andrew|last5=Mazzella|first5=Nicolas|last6=Kaserzon|first6=Sarit L.|date=2017|title=Glyphosate and AMPA passive sampling in freshwater using a microporous polyethylene diffusion sampler|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28886558/|journal=Chemosphere|volume=188|pages=241–248|doi=10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.013|issn=1879-1298|pmid=28886558|bibcode=2017Chmsp.188..241F}}</ref> The tube is filled with sorbents depending on the chemicals or chemical groups being sampled and has been successfully used to sample glyphosate, AMPA, illicit drugs and pharmaceuticals and personal care products.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite journal|date=2020-02-20|title=Calibration and validation of a microporous polyethylene passive sampler for quantitative estimation of illicit drug and pharmaceutical and personal care product (PPCP) concentrations in wastewater influent|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969719358863|journal=Science of the Total Environment|language=en|volume=704|pagesarticle-number=135891|doi=10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135891|issn=0048-9697|last1=McKay|first1=Sarah|last2=Tscharke|first2=Ben|last3=Hawker|first3=Darryl|last4=Thompson|first4=Kristie|last5=O'Brien|first5=Jake|last6=Mueller|first6=Jochen F.|last7=Kaserzon|first7=Sarit|pmid=31838300|bibcode=2020ScTEn.704m5891M70435891M|s2cid=209386153 |url-access=subscription|hdl=10072/396186|hdl-access=free}}</ref>
 
===Peepers===
Peepers are passive [[diffusion]] samplers used for metals in freshwater and marine [[sediment]] pore water, so they can be used to find areas that may have metal-contaminated sediments. Peepers are plastic vessels filled with clean water and covered in a [[Dialysis (biochemistry)|dialysis membrane]], which allows metals in sediment pore water to enter the water inside the peeper.<ref name="Peeper1">{{cite journal |last1=Serbst |first1=JR |last2=Burgess |first2=RM |last3=Kuhn |first3=A |last4=Edwards |first4=PA |last5=Cantwell |first5=MG |title=Precision of Dialysis (Peeper) Sampling of Cadmium in Marine Sediment Interstitial Water |journal=Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology |date=2003 |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=297–305 |pmid=14674581 |doi=10.1007/s00244-003-0114-5|bibcode=2003ArECT..45..297S |s2cid=23462490 }}</ref> They are usually placed deep enough into sediment to be in an [[Anoxic waters|anoxic]] environment, in which metals will be soluble enough to sample.<ref name = Missouri /> If the peepers are deployed long enough so the sediment pore water and contained peeper water reach equilibrium, they can accurately provide metal concentrations in sampled sediment pore water.<ref name = Peeper1 />
 
===Polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS)===
Line 49:
===Semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs)===
{{Main|Semipermeable membrane devices}}
Semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) passively sample [[Chemical polarity|nonpolar]] organic contaminants with a log octanol-water partition coefficient (K<sub>ow</sub>) value greater than 3. Examples of these types of chemicals include [[polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons]] (PAHs), [[polychlorinated biphenyls]] (PCBs), [[polybrominated diphenyl ethers]] (PBDEs), chlorinated pesticides, [[dioxinPolychlorinated dibenzodioxins|dioxins]]s, and [[furanPolychlorinated dibenzofurans|furans]]s. SPMDs are composed of sealed plastic tubing filled with [[triolein]], in which nonpolar organics are very soluble and which serves as a representation of the fatty tissues of aquatic organisms. The tubing is then weaved between metal rods and enclosed in a metal cage. The sampler can be made in varying lengths of tubing for different applications, since sampling rate depends on the surface area of tubing exposed to the water. As long as the amount of water passing over the sampler is known, nonpolar organic contaminant water concentrations can be calculated after extracting contaminants from a SPMD.<ref name = POCISSPMD />
[[File:Stabilized liquid membrane device (SLMD).jpg|thumb|75px |A 7.5 centimeter SLMD, filled with a 1:1 mixture of Kelex-100 and oleic acid.]]
 
===Stabilized liquid membrane devices (SLMDs)===
{{main|Stabilized liquid membrane devices}}
Stabilized liquid membrane devices (SLMDs) passively sample [[ion]]ic metals in freshwater. They are made of [[low-density polyethylene]] plastic tubing sections that are sealed on both ends and filled with an equal mixture of [[oleic acid]] and metal [[Chelation|chelating agent]]. They work by interacting with calcium and magnesium ions in freshwater, which forms a hydrophobic film on the outside the SLMD plastic membrane in which the chelating agent can bind to metals in the sampling water.<ref name = Brumbaugh /> They have been deployed for up to month-long periods in the field, alone or covered by a plastic tube housing to mediate water flow.<ref name="Missouri">{{cite journal |last1=Brumbaugh |first1=William G |last2=May |first2=Thomas W |last3=Besser |first3=John M |last4=Allert |first4=Ann L |last5=Schmitt |first5=Christopher J |title=Assessment of Elemental Concentrations in Streams of the New Lead Belt in Southeastern Missouri, 2002–05 |journal=USGS Report |series=Scientific Investigations Report |date=2007 |page=78 |publisher=United States Geological Survey|doi=10.3133/sir20075057 |bibcode=2007usgs.rept...78B }}</ref> Metal weight accumulated by a SLMD over its deployment period can be calculated and divided by the SLMD deployment time to get an average metal weight accumulated per time unit, but currently, no method has been developed to convert this to an average metal concentration. In addition, SLMD sampling rates greatly vary with water flow rate, which plastic housings can be used to control.<ref name = Brumbaugh /><ref name = Missouri />
 
==Passive sampling in air==
Passive sampling can also be accomplished for contaminants in the air, including airborne particles and hazardous vapors and gases. This can be done with man-made devices or with biomonitoring organisms, such as [[Lichen#Effects of air pollution|lichens]].<ref name = LichData /><ref name="Lichen">{{cite journal |last1=Garty |first1=J |title=Biomonitoring Atmospheric Heavy Metals with Lichens: Theory and Application |journal=Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences |date=2001 |volume=20 |issue=4 |pages=309–371 |doi=10.1080/20013591099254 |bibcode=2001CRvPS..20..309G |s2cid=59062166 }}</ref>
 
===Sorbent tubes===
Line 64:
 
==Advantages==
Contaminant concentrations from passive sampling reflect average contamination throughout the sampler deployment time, meaning the sample will capture contaminant concentration fluctuations over the whole deployment period. Traditional grab sampling does not do this, since collected samples only represent a single moment in time and multiple grab samples must be taken to observe variation in contaminant concentrations over time.<ref name = Main /> This integrative sampling method can also can result in the detection of chemicals present at such low concentrations that they would be undetected in a grab sample, due to concentration of the chemicals on the sampler over time. As a result, passive sampling has the potential to be a less time-intensive, less expensive and more accurate sampling method than grab sampling.
 
In addition, passive samplers are often easy to use and deploy, have no pumps or moving parts, and do not require electricity, since they rely on the [[molecular diffusion]] of contaminants or binding of contaminants to agents within the samplers, unlike active sampling.<ref name = Sigma /> They may also be inexpensive and simple to construct, such as SLMDs, which only require sealed plastic tubing and two chemical components.<ref name = Brumbaugh />