Content deleted Content added
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot. |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5 |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 7:
Experimental efforts to detect WIMPs include the search for products of WIMP annihilation, including [[gamma ray]]s, [[neutrino]]s and [[cosmic ray]]s in nearby galaxies and galaxy clusters; direct detection experiments designed to measure the collision of WIMPs with [[Atomic nucleus|nuclei]] in the laboratory, as well as attempts to directly produce WIMPs in colliders, such as the [[Large Hadron Collider]] at [[CERN]].
Because [[supersymmetry|supersymmetric]] extensions of the Standard Model of particle physics readily predict a new particle with these properties, this apparent coincidence is known as the "'''WIMP miracle'''", and a stable supersymmetric partner has long been a prime WIMP candidate.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Jungman |first1=Gerard |last2=Kamionkowski |first2=Marc |last3=Griest |first3=Kim |year=1996 |title=Supersymmetric dark matter |journal=Physics Reports |volume=267 |issue=5–6 |pages=195–373 |s2cid=119067698 |arxiv=hep-ph/9506380 |bibcode=1996PhR...267..195J |doi=10.1016/0370-1573(95)00058-5}}</ref> However, in the early 2010s, results from [[Dark matter#Direct detection|direct-detection]] experiments and the lack of evidence for supersymmetry at the [[Large Hadron Collider]] (LHC) experiment<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.discovery.com/space/lhc-discovery-maims-supersymmetry-again-130724.htm |title=LHC discovery maims supersymmetry again |website=Discovery News |archive-date=2016-03-13 |access-date=2014-06-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160313000505/http://news.discovery.com/space/lhc-discovery-maims-supersymmetry-again-130724.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite arXiv |last=Craig |first=Nathaniel |year=2013 |title=The State of Supersymmetry after Run I of the LHC |class=hep-ph |eprint=1309.0528}}</ref> have cast doubt on the simplest WIMP hypothesis.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fox |first1=Patrick J. |last2=Jung |first2=Gabriel |last3=Sorensen |first3=Peter |last4=Weiner |first4=Neal |year=2014 |title=Dark matter in light of LUX |journal=Physical Review D |volume=89 |issue=10 |page=103526 |arxiv=1401.0216 |bibcode=2014PhRvD..89j3526F |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103526}}</ref>
== Theoretical framework and properties ==
Line 34:
* Large mass compared to standard particles (WIMPs with sub-[[Electron volt|GeV]]/''c''<sup>2</sup> masses may be considered to be [[light dark matter]]).
Because of their lack of electromagnetic interaction with normal matter, WIMPs would be invisible through normal electromagnetic observations. Because of their large mass, they would be relatively slow moving and therefore "cold".<ref>{{cite
== As dark matter ==
Line 75:
'''Other types of detectors''' – [[Time projection chamber]]s (TPCs) filled with low pressure gases are being studied for WIMP detection. The [[Directional Recoil Identification From Tracks]] (DRIFT) collaboration is attempting to utilize the predicted directionality of the WIMP signal. DRIFT uses a [[carbon disulfide]] target, that allows WIMP recoils to travel several millimetres, leaving a track of charged particles. This charged track is drifted to an [[MWPC]] readout plane that allows it to be reconstructed in three dimensions and determine the origin direction. DMTPC is a similar experiment with CF<sub>4</sub> gas.
The DAMIC (DArk Matter In CCDs) and SENSEI (Sub Electron Noise Skipper CCD Experimental Instrument) collaborations employ the use of scientific [[Charge-coupled device|Charge Coupled Devices]] (CCDs) to detect light Dark Matter. The CCDs act as both the detector target and the readout instrumentation. WIMP interactions with the bulk of the CCD can induce the creation of electron-hole pairs, which are then collected and readout by the CCDs. In order to decrease the noise and achieve detection of single electrons, the experiments make use of a type of CCD known as the Skipper CCD, which allows for averaging over repeated measurements of the same collected charge.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=DAMIC Collaboration|last2=Aguilar-Arevalo|first2=A.|last3=Amidei|first3=D.|last4=Baxter|first4=D.|last5=Cancelo|first5=G.|last6=Cervantes Vergara|first6=B. A.|last7=Chavarria|first7=A. E.|last8=Darragh-Ford|first8=E.|last9=de Mello Neto|first9=J. R. T.|last10=D’Olivo|first10=J. C.|last11=Estrada|first11=J.|date=2019-10-31|title=Constraints on Light Dark Matter Particles Interacting with Electrons from DAMIC at SNOLAB|url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.181802|journal=Physical Review Letters|volume=123|issue=18|pages=181802|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.181802|pmid=31763884|arxiv=1907.12628|bibcode=2019PhRvL.123r1802A|hdl=10261/213092 |s2cid=198985735}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Abramoff|first1=Orr|last2=Barak|first2=Liron|last3=Bloch|first3=Itay M.|last4=Chaplinsky|first4=Luke|last5=Crisler|first5=Michael|last6=Dawa|last7=Drlica-Wagner|first7=Alex|last8=Essig|first8=Rouven|last9=Estrada|first9=Juan|last10=Etzion|first10=Erez|last11=Fernandez|first11=Guillermo|date=2019-04-24|title=SENSEI: Direct-Detection Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Matter from a Shallow Underground Run Using a Prototype Skipper-CCD|journal=Physical Review Letters|volume=122|issue=16|pages=161801|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.161801|pmid=31075006|issn=0031-9007|arxiv=1901.10478|bibcode=2019PhRvL.122p1801A|s2cid=119219165}}</ref>
=== Recent limits ===
[[File:Direct Detection Constraints.png
There are currently no confirmed detections of dark matter from direct detection experiments, with the strongest exclusion limits coming from the [[Large Underground Xenon experiment|LUX]] and [[Cryogenic Dark Matter Search|SuperCDMS]] experiments, as shown in figure 2.
With 370 kilograms of xenon, LUX is more sensitive than XENON or CDMS.<ref>
{{cite web |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/new-experiment-torpedoes-lightweight-dark-matter-particles |title=New Experiment Torpedoes Lightweight Dark Matter Particles |date=30 October 2013 |access-date=6 May 2014}}
</ref>
{{cite web |url=http://newscenter.lbl.gov/news-releases/2013/10/30/lux-first-results/ |title=First Results from LUX, the World's Most Sensitive Dark Matter Detector |publisher=Berkeley Lab News Center |date=30 October 2013 |access-date=6 May 2014}}
</ref>
Historically, there have been four anomalous sets of data from different direct detection experiments, two of which have now been explained with backgrounds ([[CoGeNT]] and CRESST-II), and two which remain unexplained ([[DAMA/LIBRA]] and [[Cryogenic Dark Matter Search|CDMS-Si]]).<ref>{{cite journal |title=Largest-ever dark-matter experiment poised to test popular theory |url=http://www.nature.com/news/largest-ever-dark-matter-experiment-poised-to-test-popular-theory-1.18772 |journal=Nature |access-date=15 January 2017|doi=10.1038/nature.2015.18772 |year=2015 |last1=Cartlidge |first1=Edwin |s2cid=182831370 |url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Davis |first1=Jonathan H. |date=2015 |title=The Past and Future of Light Dark Matter Direct Detection |journal=International Journal of Modern Physics A |volume=30 |issue=15 |page=1530038 |arxiv=1506.03924 |bibcode=2015IJMPA..3030038D |doi=10.1142/S0217751X15300380 |s2cid=119269304}}</ref> In February 2010, researchers at CDMS announced that they had observed two events that may have been caused by WIMP-nucleus collisions.<ref name="strib">{{cite web |url=http://www.startribune.com/local/79624932.html?page=1&c=y |title=Key to the universe found on the Iron Range? |website=[[Star Tribune]] |access-date=December 18, 2009}}</ref><ref>
{{cite web
|url = http://cdms.berkeley.edu/0912.3592v1.pdf
Line 107:
}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=The CDMS II Collaboration |date=2010 |title=Dark Matter Search Results from the CDMS II Experiment |journal=Science |volume=327 |issue=5973 |pages=1619–1621 |arxiv=0912.3592 |bibcode=2010Sci...327.1619C |doi=10.1126/science.1186112 |pmid=20150446 |s2cid=2517711}}</ref>
[[CoGeNT]], a smaller detector using a single germanium puck, designed to sense WIMPs with smaller masses, reported hundreds of detection events in 56 days.<ref name="NN-2010-02-26">{{cite journal |author=Hand |first=Eric |date=2010-02-26 |title=A CoGeNT result in the hunt for dark matter |url=http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100226/full/news.2010.97.html |journal=Nature |publisher=Nature News |doi=10.1038/news.2010.97|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Results from a Search for Light-Mass Dark Matter with a P-type Point Contact Germanium Detector |author=C. E. Aalseth |collaboration=CoGeNT collaboration |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.131301 |date=2011 |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=106 |issue=13 |arxiv=1002.4703 |bibcode=2011PhRvL.106m1301A |pmid=21517370 |page=131301|s2cid=24822628 }}</ref> They observed an annual modulation in the event rate that could indicate light dark matter.<ref name="Dacey2011">{{cite web |last1=Dacey |first1=James |date=June 2011 |title=CoGeNT findings support dark-matter halo theory |url=http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/jun/15/cogent-findings-support-dark-matter-halo-theory |access-date=5 May 2015 |publisher=physicsworld}}</ref> However, a dark matter origin for the CoGeNT events has been refuted by more recent analyses, in favour of an explanation in terms of a background from surface events.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Davis |first1=Jonathan H. |last2=McCabe |first2=Christopher |last3=Boehm |first3=Celine |title=Quantifying the evidence for Dark Matter in CoGeNT data |journal=Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics |date=2014 |volume=1408 |issue=8 |page=014 |doi=10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/014 |arxiv = 1405.0495 |bibcode = 2014JCAP...08..014D |s2cid=54532870 }}</ref>
Annual modulation is one of the predicted signatures of a WIMP signal,<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Drukier|first1=Andrzej K.|last2=Freese|first2=Katherine|last3=Spergel|first3=David N.|title=Detecting cold dark-matter candidates|journal=Physical Review D|date=15 June 1986|volume=33|issue=12|pages=3495–3508|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3495|pmid=9956575|bibcode=1986PhRvD..33.3495D}}</ref><ref name="Freese1988">{{cite journal |author=Freese |first1=K. |last2=Frieman |first2=J. |last3=Gould |first3=A. |year=1988 |title=Signal Modulation in Cold Dark Matter Detection |journal=Physical Review D |volume=37 |issue=12 |pages=3388–3405 |bibcode=1988PhRvD..37.3388F |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3388 |osti=1448427 |pmid=9958634 |s2cid=2610174}}</ref> and on this basis the DAMA collaboration has claimed a positive detection. Other groups, however, have not confirmed this result. The CDMS data, made public in May 2004. exclude the entire DAMA signal region given certain standard assumptions about the properties of the WIMPs and the dark matter halo, and this has been followed by many other experiments (see Figure 2).
The [[Korea Invisible Mass Search#COSINE|COSINE-100]] collaboration (a merging of KIMS and DM-Ice groups) published their results on replicating the DAMA/LIBRA signal in December 2018 in journal Nature; their conclusion was that "this result rules out WIMP–nucleon interactions as the cause of the annual modulation observed by the DAMA collaboration".<ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.1038/s41586-018-0739-1|pmid = 30518890| title=An experiment to search for dark-matter interactions using sodium iodide detectors| journal=Nature| volume=564| issue=7734| pages=83–86| year=2018| author1=COSINE-100 Collaboration| bibcode=2018Natur.564...83C|arxiv = 1906.01791|s2cid = 54459495}}</ref> In 2021, new results from COSINE-100 and [[ANAIS-112]] both failed to replicate the DAMA/LIBRA signal<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Amaré |first1=J. |last2=Cebrián |first2=S. |last3=Cintas |first3=D. |last4=Coarasa |first4=I. |last5=García |first5=E. |last6=Martínez |first6=M. |last7=Oliván |first7=M. A. |last8=Ortigoza |first8=Y. |last9=de Solórzano |first9=A. Ortiz |last10=Puimedón |first10=J. |last11=Salinas |first11=A. |date=2021-05-27 |title=Annual modulation results from three-year exposure of ANAIS-112 |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.102005 |journal=Physical Review D |language=en |volume=103 |issue=10 |pages=102005 |arxiv=2103.01175 |bibcode=2021PhRvD.103j2005A |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.103.102005 |issn=2470-0010 |s2cid=232092298}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Adhikari |first1=Govinda |last2=de Souza |first2=Estella B. |last3=Carlin |first3=Nelson |last4=Choi |first4=Jae Jin |last5=Choi |first5=Seonho |last6=Djamal |first6=Mitra |last7=Ezeribe |first7=Anthony C. |last8=França |first8=Luis E. |last9=Ha |first9=Chang Hyon |last10=Hahn |first10=In Sik |last11=Jeon |first11=Eunju |date=2021-11-12 |title=Strong constraints from COSINE-100 on the DAMA dark matter results using the same sodium iodide target |journal=Science Advances |language=en |volume=7 |issue=46 |pages=eabk2699 |bibcode=2021SciA....7.2699A |doi=10.1126/sciadv.abk2699 |issn=2375-2548 |pmc=8580298 |pmid=34757778|arxiv=2104.03537 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Is the end in sight for famous dark matter claim? |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/end-sight-famous-dark-matter-claim |access-date=2021-12-29 |website=www.science.org |language=en}}</ref> and in August 2022, COSINE-100 applied an analysis method similar to one used by DAMA/LIBRA and found a similar annual modulation suggesting the signal could be just a statistical artifact,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Adhikari |first1=G. |last2=Carlin |first2=N. |last3=Choi |first3=J. J. |last4=Choi |first4=S. |last5=Ezeribe |first5=A. C. |last6=Franca |first6=L. E. |last7=Ha |first7=C. |last8=Hahn |first8=I. S. |last9=Hollick |first9=S. J. |last10=Jeon |first10=E. J. |last11=Jo |first11=J. H. |last12=Joo |first12=H. W. |last13=Kang |first13=W. G. |last14=Kauer |first14=M. |last15=Kim |first15=B. H. |date=2023 |title=An induced annual modulation signature in COSINE-100 data by DAMA/LIBRA's analysis method |journal=Scientific Reports |volume=13 |issue=1 |page=4676 |doi=10.1038/s41598-023-31688-4 |pmid=36949218 |pmc=10033922 |arxiv=2208.05158 |bibcode=2023NatSR..13.4676A }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Castelvecchi |first=Davide |date=2022-08-16 |title=Notorious dark-matter signal could be due to analysis error |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02222-9 |journal=Nature |language=en |doi=10.1038/d41586-022-02222-9|pmid=35974221 |s2cid=251624302 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> supporting a hypothesis first put forward in 2020.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Buttazzo |first=D. |display-authors=etal |year=2020 |title=Annual modulations from secular variations: relaxing DAMA? |journal=Journal of High Energy Physics |volume=2020 |issue=4 |page=137 |arxiv=2002.00459 |bibcode=2020JHEP...04..137B |doi=10.1007/JHEP04(2020)137 |s2cid=211010848}}</ref>
=== Future of direct detection ===
[[File:WIMPsLZexperiment2023.png
The 2020s should see the emergence of several multi-tonne mass direct detection experiments, which will probe WIMP-nucleus cross sections orders of magnitude smaller than the current state-of-the-art sensitivity. Examples of such next-generation experiments are LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) and XENONnT, which are multi-tonne liquid xenon experiments, followed by DARWIN, another proposed liquid xenon direct detection experiment of 50–100 tonnes.<ref>{{cite arXiv |eprint=1110.0103|last1= Malling|first1= D. C.|title= After LUX: The LZ Program |display-authors= etal |class= astro-ph.IM|year= 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Baudis |first1=Laura |title=DARWIN: dark matter WIMP search with noble liquids |journal=J. Phys. Conf. Ser. |date=2012 |volume=375 |issue=1 |page=012028 |doi=10.1088/1742-6596/375/1/012028 |arxiv=1201.2402|bibcode=2012JPhCS.375a2028B |s2cid=30885844 }}</ref>
Such multi-tonne experiments will also face a new background in the form of neutrinos, which will limit their ability to probe the WIMP parameter space beyond a certain point, known as the neutrino floor. However, although its name may imply a hard limit, the neutrino floor represents the region of parameter space beyond which experimental sensitivity can only improve at best as the square root of exposure (the product of detector mass and running time).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Billard |first1=J. |last2=Strigari |first2=L. |last3=Figueroa-Feliciano |first3=E. |date=2014 |title=Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments |journal=Physical Review D |volume=89 |issue=2 |page=023524 |arxiv=1307.5458 |bibcode=2014PhRvD..89b3524B |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.89.023524 |s2cid=16208132}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Davis |first1=Jonathan H. |title=Dark Matter vs. Neutrinos: The effect of astrophysical uncertainties and timing information on the neutrino floor |journal=Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics |date=2015 |volume=1503 |issue=3 |page=012 |doi=10.1088/1475-7516/2015/03/012 |arxiv=1412.1475|bibcode = 2015JCAP...03..012D |s2cid=118596203 }}</ref> For WIMP masses below 10 GeV/''c''<sup>2</sup>, the dominant source of neutrino background is from the [[Solar neutrino|Sun]], while for higher masses the background contains contributions from [[Neutrino#Atmospheric|atmospheric neutrino]]s and the [[diffuse supernova neutrino background]].
In December 2021, results from [[PandaX]] have found no signal in their data, with a lowest excluded cross section of {{val|3.8|e=-47|ul=cm2}} at 40 GeV with 90% confidence level.<ref name="Meng et al-2021">{{cite journal|last1=Meng|first1=Yue|last2=Wang|first2=Zhou|last3=Tao|first3=Yi|last4=Abdukerim|first4=Abdusalam|last5=Bo|first5=Zihao|last6=Chen|first6=Wei|last7=Chen|first7=Xun|last8=Chen|first8=Yunhua|last9=Cheng|first9=Chen|last10=Cheng|first10=Yunshan|last11=Cui|first11=Xiangyi|date=2021-12-23|title=Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run|url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.261802|journal=Physical Review Letters|language=en|volume=127|issue=26|pages=261802|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.261802|pmid=35029500| arxiv=2107.13438 | bibcode=2021PhRvL.127z1802M |s2cid=236469421|issn=0031-9007}}</ref><ref name="Stephens-2021">{{cite journal|last=Stephens|first=Marric|date=2021-12-23|title=Tightening the Net on Two Kinds of Dark Matter|url=https://physics.aps.org/articles/v14/s164|journal=Physics|language=en|volume=14| doi=10.1103/Physics.14.s164 | bibcode=2021PhyOJ..14.s164S | s2cid=247277808 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
In July 2023, the [[XENON#XENONnT|XENONnT]] and [[LZ experiment]] published the first results of their searches for WIMPs,<ref>{{cite journal |last=Day |first=Charles |date=2023-07-28 |title=The Search for WIMPs Continues |url=https://physics.aps.org/articles/v16/s106 |journal=Physics |volume=16 |pages=s106 |doi=10.1103/Physics.16.s106 |bibcode=2023PhyOJ..16.s106D |s2cid=260751963 |language=en |doi-access=free }}</ref> the first excluding cross sections above {{val|2.58|e=-47|u=cm2}} at 28 GeV with 90% confidence level<ref>{{cite journal |last1=XENON Collaboration |last2=Aprile |first2=E. |last3=Abe |first3=K. |last4=Agostini |first4=F. |last5=Ahmed Maouloud |first5=S. |last6=Althueser |first6=L. |last7=Andrieu |first7=B. |last8=Angelino |first8=E. |last9=Angevaare |first9=J. R. |last10=Antochi |first10=V. C. |last11=Antón Martin |first11=D. |last12=Arneodo |first12=F. |last13=Baudis |first13=L. |last14=Baxter |first14=A. L. |last15=Bazyk |first15=M. |date=2023-07-28 |title=First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.041003 |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=131 |issue=4 |pages=041003 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.041003|pmid=37566859 |arxiv=2303.14729 |bibcode=2023PhRvL.131d1003A |s2cid=257767449 }}</ref> and the second excluding cross sections above {{val|9.2|e=-48|u=cm2}} at 36 GeV with 90% confidence level.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=LUX-ZEPLIN Collaboration |last2=Aalbers |first2=J. |last3=Akerib |first3=D. S. |last4=Akerlof |first4=C. W. |last5=Al Musalhi |first5=A. K. |last6=Alder |first6=F. |last7=Alqahtani |first7=A. |last8=Alsum |first8=S. K. |last9=Amarasinghe |first9=C. S. |last10=Ames |first10=A. |last11=Anderson |first11=T. J. |last12=Angelides |first12=N. |last13=Araújo |first13=H. M. |last14=Armstrong |first14=J. E. |last15=Arthurs |first15=M. |date=2023-07-28 |title=First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.041002 |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=131 |issue=4 |pages=041002 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.041002|pmid=37566836 |arxiv=2207.03764 |bibcode=2023PhRvL.131d1002A |s2cid=250343331 }}</ref>
== See also ==
| |||