Content deleted Content added
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#nbcnews.com |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 31:
{{Private spaceflight}}
[[SpaceX]] has [[private spaceflight|privately funded]] the development of [[Orbital spaceflight|orbital]] [[spacecraft|launch system]]s that can be [[reusable launch vehicle|reused]] many times, similar to the reusability of [[aircraft]]. SpaceX has developed technologies
The program was announced in 2011. SpaceX first achieved a [[Falcon 9 Flight 20|successful landing and recovery of a first stage]] in December 2015. The [[SES-10|first re-flight of a landed first stage]] occurred in March 2017<ref name=sn20170330/> with the second occurring in June 2017, that one only five months after the maiden flight of the booster.<ref name=sir-20170626 /> The third attempt occurred in October 2017 with the [[SES-11]]/[[EchoStar-105]] mission. Reflights of refurbished first stages then became routine. In May 2021, B1051 became the first booster to launch ten missions.<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Sesnic|first1=Trevor|last2=Fletcher|first2=Colin|last3=Kanayama|first3=Lee|date=2021-05-08|title=SpaceX flies historic 10th mission of a Falcon 9 as Starlink constellation expands|url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/05/historic-10th-falcon9-reflight/|access-date=2021-05-19|website=NASASpaceFlight.com|language=en-US|archive-date=May 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210516121203/https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/05/historic-10th-falcon9-reflight/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Line 37:
The [[reusable launch system]] technology was initially developed for the first stage of [[Falcon 9]].<ref name=sn20141024/> After [[Separation event|stage separation]], the booster flips around (an optional '''boostback burn'''<!-- bolded per [[WP:MOSBOLD]] as a redirect link --> reverses its course), a reentry burn sheds gravity-induced speed to prevent stage overheating as the spacecraft [[atmospheric reentry|reenters the thicker part of the atmosphere]], and a landing burn accomplishes the final low-altitude deceleration and touchdown.
SpaceX planned
{{As of|2023}}, SpaceX is developing the [[SpaceX Starship|Starship]] system to be a fully-reusable two-stage launch vehicle, intended to replace all of its other launch vehicles and spacecraft for satellite delivery and human transport—Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, and Dragon—and eventually support flights to the Moon and Mars. It could theoretically be used for point-to-point transportation on Earth.<ref name="musk201803journal">{{cite journal|last1=Musk|first1=Elon|date=1 March 2018|title=Making Life Multi-Planetary|journal=New Space|volume=6|issue=1|pages=2–11|bibcode=2018NewSp...6....2M|doi=10.1089/space.2018.29013.emu}}</ref>
{{TOC limit|4}}
== History ==
[[File:SpaceX rockets.svg|thumb|upright=2|right|From left to right, [[Falcon 1]], [[Falcon 9 v1.0]], three versions of [[Falcon 9 v1.1]], three versions of [[Falcon 9 Full Thrust|Falcon 9 v1.2 (Full Thrust)]], three versions of [[Falcon 9 Block 5]], [[Falcon Heavy]], three versions of [[Falcon Heavy Block 5]] and [[SpaceX Starship|Starship]] Block 1. The SpaceX reusable rocket technology is being developed for Falcon 9 v1.2, Falcon Heavy and Starship.]]
SpaceX attempted to land the first stage of the [[Falcon 1#Reusability|Falcon 1 by parachute]], but the stage did not survive atmosphere re-entry. They continued to experiment unsuccessfully with parachutes on the earliest [[Falcon 9]] flights after 2010. SpaceX subsequently switched to developing a [[Retropropulsion|powered descent]] [[VTVL|landing]] system.<ref name=nsf20170330>{{cite news |last=Graham |first=William |url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/03/spacex-historic-falcon-9-re-flight-ses-10/ |title=SpaceX conducts historic Falcon 9 re-flight with SES-10 – Lands booster again |work=[[NASASpaceFlight.com]] |date=2017-03-30 |access-date=2017-05-27 |quote='The earliest Falcon 9 launches carried parachutes which were to have been used to recover the first stage. However, this was abandoned due to the stage disintegrating during reentry, before the parachutes could be deployed. Instead, SpaceX began to investigate using the stage’s engines to make a powered descent and landing. Alongside this, an improved Falcon 9 vehicle, the Falcon 9 v1.1, was developed.' |archive-date=May 17, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170517125334/https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/03/spacex-historic-falcon-9-re-flight-ses-10/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
A description of the reusable launch system was outlined in September 2011. SpaceX said it would attempt to develop powered descent and recovery of both Falcon 9 stages{{mdash}}a fully vertical takeoff, vertical landing ([[VTVL]]) rocket. The company produced an animated video of the first stage returning tail-first for a powered descent and the second stage with a heat shield, reentering head first before rotating for a powered descent.<ref name="wp20110929">{{cite video |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkvLQdzZRFo |title=SpaceX Chief Details Reusable Rocket |date=September 29, 2011 |language=en-us |access-date=April 9, 2016 |via=Associated Press |work=Washington Post}}</ref><ref name="sdc20110930">{{cite news |url=http://www.space.com/13140-spacex-private-reusable-rocket-elon-musk.html |title=SpaceX Unveils Plan for World's First Fully Reusable Rocket |newspaper=Space.com |last=Wall |first=Mike |date=September 30, 2011 |access-date=October 11, 2011 |archive-date=October 10, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111010191516/http://www.space.com/13140-spacex-private-reusable-rocket-elon-musk.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="SpaceX Video from SpaceX. com">{{cite web |url=http://www.spacex.com/assets/video/spacex-rtls-green.mp4 |title=Falcon 9 Return to Launch Site |format=video |work=SpaceX.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111011221641/http://www.spacex.com/assets/video/spacex-rtls-green.mp4 |archive-date=October 11, 2011}}</ref><ref name="npc20110929">{{cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrVD3tcVWTY |title=National Press Club: The Future of Human Spaceflight |medium=video |work=NPC video repository |date=September 29, 2011 |people=Mark Hamrick, Elon Musk |publisher=National Press Club |quote=@18:15 "It is a very tough engineering problem—and it wasn't something that I thought, wasn't sure it could be solved for a while. But then, just relatively recently, in the last 12 months or so, I've come to the conclusion that it can be solved. And SpaceX is going to try to do it. Now, we could fail. I am not saying we are certain of success here, but we are going to try to do it. And we have a design that, on paper, doing the calculations, doing the simulations, it does work. Now we need to make sure that those simulations and reality agree, because generally when they don't, reality wins. So that's to be determined."}}</ref><!-- ←the original source was http://www.c-span.org/Events/National-Press-Club-The-Future-of-Human-Spaceflight/10737424486/ |title=National Press Club: The Future of Human Spaceflight |work=C-SPAN.org |date=September 29, 2011 --- but that link has gone dead. Found another copy on the NPC video repository on YouTube --> In September 2012, SpaceX began flight tests on a prototype reusable first stage with the suborbital [[
News of the Grasshopper test rocket had become public a few days earlier, when the [[Federal Aviation Administration|US Federal Aviation Administration]] released a [[National Environmental Policy Act|draft Environmental Impact Assessment]] for the SpaceX Test Site in Texas, and the space media had reported it.<ref name="faa20110922">{{cite web |url=http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/20110922%20spacex%20grasshopper%20draft%20ea.final.pdf |title=Draft Environmental Assessment for Issuing an Experimental Permit to SpaceX for Operation of the Grasshopper Vehicle at the McGregor Test Site, Texas |publisher=Federal Aviation Administration |date=September 22, 2011 |access-date=November 21, 2013 |archive-date=January 12, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130112212209/http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/20110922%20spacex%20grasshopper%20draft%20ea.final.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="satspot20110926" /> In May 2012, SpaceX obtained a set of atmospheric test data for the recovery of the Falcon 9 first stage based on 176 test runs in the [[NASA]] [[Marshall Space Flight Center]] [[wind tunnel]] test facility. The work was contracted out by SpaceX under a reimbursable [[Space Act Agreement]] with NASA.<ref name="sn20120528">{{cite news |url=http://www.spacenews.com/article/nasa-finishes-wind-tunnel-testing-falcon-9-1st-stage |title=NASA Finishes Wind-tunnel Testing of Falcon 9 1st Stage |work=Space News |date=May 28, 2012 |access-date=June 26, 2012 }}</ref>
Line 56:
In November 2012, CEO [[Elon Musk]] announced plans to build a second, much larger, [[SpaceX super-heavy lift launch vehicle|reusable rocket system]] powered by [[LOX]]/[[liquid methane|methane]] rather than LOX/[[RP-1]] used on Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy. The new system was to be "an evolution of SpaceX's Falcon 9 booster", and SpaceX reiterated their commitment to develop a breakthrough in vertical landing technology.<ref name="sdc20121123">{{cite news |url=http://www.space.com/18596-mars-colony-spacex-elon-musk.html |title=Huge Mars Colony Eyed by SpaceX Founder Elon Musk |work=Space.com |last=Coppinger |first=Rod |date=November 23, 2012 |access-date=November 25, 2012 |quote=much bigger [than Falcon 9], but I don’t think we’re quite ready to state the payload. We’ll speak about that next year. |archive-date=June 28, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130628154029/http://www.space.com/18596-mars-colony-spacex-elon-musk.html |url-status=live }}</ref> By the end of 2012, the demonstration test vehicle, Grasshopper, had made three VTVL test flights{{mdash}}including a 29-second hover flight to {{convert|40|m|sp=us}} on December 17, 2012.<ref name="cl20121224">{{cite news |url=http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/23/16114180-spacex-launches-its-grasshopper-rocket-on-12-story-high-hop-in-texas |title=SpaceX launches its Grasshopper rocket on 12-story-high hop in Texas |work=NBC News{{\}}Cosmic Log |last=Boyle |first=Alan |date=December 24, 2012 |access-date=December 25, 2012 |archive-date=March 3, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303194358/http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/23/16114180-spacex-launches-its-grasshopper-rocket-on-12-story-high-hop-in-texas |url-status=live }}</ref> In early March 2013, SpaceX successfully tested Grasshopper for a fourth time when it flew to an altitude of over {{convert|80|m|sp=us}}.<ref name=nsj20130309/>
In March 2013, SpaceX announced that it would instrument and equip subsequent Falcon 9 first-stages as controlled descent test vehicles, with plans for over-water propulsively decelerated simulated landings beginning in 2013, with the intent to return the vehicle to the launch site for a powered landing{{mdash}}possibly as early as mid-2014.<ref name="pa20130328">{{cite news |url=http://www.parabolicarc.com/2013/03/28/dragon-post-mission-press-conference-notes/ |title=Dragon Post-Mission Press Conference Notes |work=Parabolic Arc |last=Messier |first=Doug |date=March 28, 2013 |access-date=March 30, 2013 |quote=Q. What is strategy on booster recover? Musk: Initial recovery test will be a water landing. First stage continue in ballistic arc and execute a velocity reduction burn before it enters atmosphere to lessen impact. Right before splashdown, will light up the engine again. Emphasizes that we don’t expect success in the first several attempts. Hopefully next year with more experience and data, we should be able to return the first stage to the launch site and do a propulsion landing on land using legs. Q. Is there a flight identified for return to launch site of the booster? Musk: No. Will probably be the middle of next year. |archive-date=May 31, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130531230305/http://www.parabolicarc.com/2013/03/28/dragon-post-mission-press-conference-notes/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The April 2013 draft [[Environmental impact statement|Environmental Impact Statement]] for the proposed [[SpaceX South Texas Launch Site]] includes specific accommodations for return of the Falcon 9 first-stage boosters to the launch site.<ref name="faa201304v1">{{cite report|url=http://1.usa.gov/YtxBzo |title=Draft Environmental Impact Statement: SpaceX Texas Launch Site |publisher=Federal Aviation Administration{{\}}Office of Commercial Space Transportation |last=Nield |first=George C. |volume=1 |date=April 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131207085028/http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/environmental/nepa_docs/review/documents_progress/spacex_texas_launch_site_environmental_impact_statement/media/SpaceX_Texas_Launch_Site_Draft_EIS_V1.pdf |archive-date=December 7, 2013 }}</ref> Elon Musk first publicly referred to the reusable Falcon 9 as the
In September 2013, SpaceX successfully relit three engines of a spent booster on an orbital launch, and the booster re-entered the atmosphere at hypersonic speed without burning up.<ref name=fp20131209/> With the data collected from the first flight test of a booster-controlled descent from high altitude, coupled with the technological advancements made on the Grasshopper low-altitude landing demonstrator, SpaceX announced it believed it was ready to test a full land-recovery of a booster stage.<ref name=pm20130930/> Based on the positive results from the first high-altitude flight test, SpaceX advanced the expected date of a test from mid-2014 to early 2015{{clarify|date=September 2016}}, with the intention of doing so on the [[SpaceX CRS-3|next Space Station cargo resupply flight]] pending regulatory approvals.<ref name="bbc20130930" /><ref name="pa20130930" /> That flight took place on April 18, 2014.<ref name=aw20140428a>{{cite news |last=Norris |first=Guy |title=SpaceX Plans For Multiple Reusable Booster Tests |url=http://aviationweek.com/space/spacex-plans-multiple-reusable-booster-tests |access-date=May 17, 2014 |newspaper=Aviation Week |date=April 28, 2014 |quote=The April 17 F9R Dev 1 flight, which lasted under 1 min., was the first vertical landing test of a production-representative recoverable Falcon 9 v1.1 first stage, while the April 18 cargo flight to the ISS was the first opportunity for SpaceX to evaluate the design of foldable landing legs and upgraded thrusters that control the stage during its initial descent. |archive-date=April 26, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140426201818/http://aviationweek.com/space/spacex-plans-multiple-reusable-booster-tests |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="ut20140419">{{cite news |url=http://www.universetoday.com/111377/spacex-makes-strides-towards-1st-stage-falcon-rocket-recovery-during-space-station-launch/ |title=SpaceX Makes Strides Towards 1st Stage Falcon Rocket Recovery during Space Station Launch |work=Universe Today |last=Kremer |first=Ken |date=April 19, 2014 |access-date=April 19, 2014 |archive-date=April 19, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140419222428/http://www.universetoday.com/111377/spacex-makes-strides-towards-1st-stage-falcon-rocket-recovery-during-space-station-launch/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Line 92:
* New [[Spacecraft attitude control|attitude control]] technology for the booster to bring the descending [[rocket body]] through the atmosphere in a manner conducive both to non-destructive return and [[Aerodynamic control surfaces|sufficient aerodynamic control]] such that the terminal phase of the [[VTVL|landing]] is possible.<ref name="pa20140114vid">
{{cite video |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtNgWK4mm0M |title=Singapore Satellite Industry Forum 2013 – Opening Keynote |date=June 17, 2013 |language=en |access-date=April 9, 2016 |people=Gwynne Shotwell}}</ref> This includes sufficient roll [[Control system|control authority]] to keep the rocket from spinning excessively as occurred on the [[Falcon 9 Flight 6#Post-mission launch vehicle testing|first high-altitude flight test]] in September 2013, where the roll rate exceeded the capabilities of the booster [[attitude control system]] (ACS) and the fuel in the tanks "centrifuged" to the side of the tank shutting down the single engine involved in the low-altitude deceleration maneuver.<ref name="pa20130930" /><ref name="tss20140321b">{{cite AV media |url=http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2212-BWB-2014-03-21.mp3 |title=Broadcast 2212: Special Edition, interview with Gwynne Shotwell |date=March 21, 2014 |medium=audio file |language=en |publisher=The Space Show |time=51;50–52;55 |access-date=March 22, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140322013556/http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2212-BWB-2014-03-21.mp3 |archive-date=March 22, 2014 |url-status=dead |format=mp3 |id=2212 |people=Gwynne Shotwell}}</ref> The technology needs to handle the transition from the vacuum of space at [[hypersonic]] conditions, decelerating to [[supersonic]] velocities and passing through [[Transonic buffet|transonic]] [[Buffet (turbulence)|buffet]], before relighting one of the main-stage engines at [[terminal velocity]].<ref name=pm20130930/>
* Hypersonic [[grid fin]]s were added to the booster test vehicle design beginning on the [[Falcon 9 Flight 14|fifth ocean controlled-descent test flight]] in 2014 in order to enable precision landing. Arranged in an "X" configuration, the grid fins control the descending rocket's [[lift vector]] once the vehicle has returned to the atmosphere to enable a much more precise [[Landing ellipse|landing ___location]].<ref name=sx20141216>{{cite
[[File:Falcon 9 with CRS-3 Dragon in SLC-40 hangar (16855338881).jpg|thumb|left|Falcon 9 v1.1 with landing legs attached, in stowed position as the rocket is prepared for launch in its hangar]]
* The [[Rocket engine throttling|rocket engine needs to be throttleable]] to achieve zero velocity at the same time the rocket reaches the ground. Even the lowest possible thrust of a single [[Merlin 1D]] engine exceeds the weight of the nearly empty Falcon 9 booster core, therefore the rocket cannot hover.<ref name=fg20130321>{{cite news |last=Rosenberg |first=Zach |title=SpaceX Merlin 1D qualified for flight |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/spacex-merlin-1d-qualified-for-flight-383738/ |access-date=March 18, 2014 |newspaper=Flightglobal |date=March 21, 2013 |archive-date=October 30, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131030135922/http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/spacex-merlin-1d-qualified-for-flight-383738/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=slr20140312>{{cite web |title=SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 Data Sheet |url=http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/falcon9v1-1.html |publisher=Space Launch Report |access-date=March 18, 2014 |date=March 12, 2014 |archive-date=November 11, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111220657/https://www.spacelaunchreport.com/falcon9v1-1.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=blackmore2016/>
Line 100:
* A large [[floating landing platform]] for launches where the first stage does not have sufficient fuel to return to the launch site. As of 2022, SpaceX built three [[autonomous spaceport drone ship]]s, one operating the West coast and two on the East coast of the United States.
* A [[thermal protection system]] to avoid damage to the first stage when re-entering the atmosphere.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/05/11/spacex-debuts-an-improved-human-rated-model-of-the-falcon-9-rocket/|title=SpaceX debuts new model of the Falcon 9 rocket designed for astronauts|date=11 May 2018|access-date=August 23, 2019|archive-date=April 1, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210401055341/https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/05/11/spacex-debuts-an-improved-human-rated-model-of-the-falcon-9-rocket/|url-status=live}}</ref>
* Lightweight, deployable [[Launch vehicle landing gear|landing gear]] for the booster stage.<ref name="satspot20110926" /><ref name=blackmore2016>{{cite journal |title=Autonomous Precision Landing of Space Rockets |journal=The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering |date=Winter 2016 |last=Blackmore |first=Lars |volume=46 |issue=4 |pages=15–20 |issn=0737-6278 |url=http://web.mit.edu/larsb/www/nae_bridge_2016.pdf |access-date=January 15, 2017 |archive-date=January 10, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170110121559/http://web.mit.edu/larsb/www/nae_bridge_2016.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> In May 2013, the design was shown to be a nested, telescoping piston on an A-frame. The total span of the four [[carbon fiber]]/[[aluminum]] extensible landing legs<ref name="sxn20130729legs">{{cite
== Economics of rocket reuse ==
Line 110:
{{cite news |last=Belfiore |first=Michael |title=SpaceX Brings a Booster Safely Back to Earth |url=http://www.technologyreview.com/news/526806/spacex-brings-a-booster-safely-back-to-earth/ |access-date=April 25, 2014 |newspaper=MIT Technology Review |date=April 22, 2014}}</ref><ref name="bi20141125">{{cite news |last1=Orwig |first1=Jessica |date=November 25, 2014 |title=Elon Musk Just Unveiled A Game-Changing Ocean Landing Pad For His Reusable Rockets |url=http://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-rockets-that-land-at-sea-2014-11 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171026092835/http://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-rockets-that-land-at-sea-2014-11 |archive-date=October 26, 2017 |access-date=December 11, 2014 |work=Business Insider |quote=''The first successful "soft landing" of a Falcon 9 rocket happened in April of this year.''}}</ref>
[[File:Falcon 9 First Stage Reusability Graphic.jpg|thumb|upright=
Space industry analyst Ajay Kothari has noted that SpaceX reusable technology could do for [[space transport]] "what jet engines did for air transportation sixty years ago when people never imagined that more than 500 million passengers would travel by airplanes every year and that the cost could be reduced to the level it is—all because of passenger volume and reliable reusability."<ref name=tsr20140414>{{cite news |last=Kothari |first=Ajay P. |title=Robust and reusable? |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2490/1 |access-date=April 14, 2014 |newspaper=The Space Review |date=April 14, 2014 |archive-date=April 15, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140415115822/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2490/1 |url-status=live }}</ref> SpaceX said in January 2014 that if they are successful in developing the reusable technology, launch prices of around {{USD|5 to 7 million}} for a reusable Falcon 9 were possible,<ref name=ps20140114>{{cite news |last=Messier |first=Doug |title=Shotwell: Reusable Falcon 9 Would Cost $5 to $7 Million Per Launch |url=http://www.parabolicarc.com/2014/01/14/shotwell/ |access-date=January 15, 2014 |newspaper=Parabolic Arc |date=January 14, 2014 |archive-date=February 16, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170216044345/http://www.parabolicarc.com/2014/01/14/shotwell/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and following the successful first stage recovery in December 2015, Musk said that "the potential cost reduction over the long term is probably in excess of a factor of 100."<ref name=cbs20151222/>
Line 139:
== Falcon 9 reusability development ==
In 2013 SpaceX was testing reusable technologies both for its [[Booster (rocketry)|first-stage booster]] launch vehicle designs (with three test vehicles: [[
SpaceX has publicly disclosed a multi-element, incremental test program for booster stages that includes four aspects:
* low-altitude (less than {{convert|760|m|ft|-2|disp=x|/|abbr=on}}<ref name="faa20110922" /><ref name=wt20130508>{{cite news |last=Abbott |first=Joseph |title=SpaceX's Grasshopper leaping to NM spaceport |url=http://www.wacotrib.com/news/business/spacex-s-grasshopper-leaping-to-nm-spaceport/article_de2126cd-d6ec-563b-b84b-532641e709e3.html |access-date=October 25, 2013 |newspaper=Waco Tribune |date=May 8, 2013 |archive-date=August 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200805174829/https://wacotrib.com/news/business/spacex-s-grasshopper-leaping-to-nm-spaceport/article_de2126cd-d6ec-563b-b84b-532641e709e3.html |url-status=live }}</ref>), low-velocity testing of its single-engine [[
* low-altitude (less than {{convert|3000|m|ft|-2|disp=x|/|abbr=on}}), low-velocity testing of a much larger, second-generation, three-engine test vehicle called [[F9R Dev1]]. The second generation vehicle includes extensible landing legs and will be tested at the Texas test site<ref name=tsr20140505>{{cite news |last=Foust |first=Jeff |title=Following up: reusability, B612, satellite servicing |url=http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2505/1 |access-date=May 6, 2014 |newspaper=The Space Review |date=May 5, 2014 |archive-date=May 6, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140506133336/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2505/1 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* high-altitude, mid-velocity testing was planned but cancelled in favor of [[Falcon 9 first-stage landing tests|post-mission re-entry tests of first-stage boosters]]. It would have used F9R Dev2 at a SpaceX leased facility at [[Spaceport America]] in [[New Mexico]].
Line 158:
==== Grasshopper ====
{{main|SpaceX Grasshopper{{!}}Grasshopper (rocket)}}
Grasshopper, the company's first [[VTVL]] test vehicle, consisted of a [[Falcon 9 v1.0]] first-stage tank, a single [[Merlin 1D|Merlin-1D]] engine, and four permanently attached steel landing legs. It stood {{convert|106|ft}} tall.<ref name="satspot20110926">{{cite news |url=http://satellite.tmcnet.com/topics/satellite/articles/222324-spacex-plans-test-reusable-suborbital-vtvl-rocket-texas.htm |title=SpaceX Plans to Test Reusable Suborbital VTVL Rocket in Texas |newspaper=Satellite Spotlight |last=Mohney |first=Doug |date=September 26, 2011 |access-date=November 21, 2013 |archive-date=August 4, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160804024136/http://satellite.tmcnet.com/topics/satellite/articles/222324-spacex-plans-test-reusable-suborbital-vtvl-rocket-texas.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> SpaceX built a {{Convert|0.5|acre|ha|adj=on}} concrete launch facility at its Rocket Development and Test Facility in [[McGregor, Texas]] to support the Grasshopper flight test program.<ref name="sfn20120709">{{cite news |url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1207/10grasshopper/ |title=Reusable rocket prototype almost ready for first liftoff |newspaper=Spaceflight Now |first=Stephen |last=Clark |date=July 9, 2012 |access-date=July 13, 2012 |quote=SpaceX has constructed a half-acre concrete launch facility in McGregor, and the Grasshopper rocket is already standing on the pad, outfitted with four insect-like silver landing legs. |archive-date=May 21, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130521132738/http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1207/10grasshopper/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Line 181:
The DragonFly test vehicle is powered by eight [[SuperDraco]] engines, arranged in a redundant pattern to support [[fault-tolerance]] in the propulsion system design.<ref name=wt20140522/> SuperDracos use a [[storable propellant]] mixture of [[monomethyl hydrazine]] (MMH) [[fuel]] and [[nitrogen tetroxide]] [[oxidizer]] (NTO), the same propellants used in the smaller [[Draco (rocket engine family)|Draco]] thrusters used for [[Spacecraft attitude control|attitude control]] and [[Reaction control system|maneuvering]] on the first-generation [[Dragon spacecraft]].<ref name=faa201311/> While SuperDraco engines are capable of {{convert|16400|lbf|N|order=flip}} of thrust, during use on the DragonFly flight test vehicle, each will be [[Rocket engine throttling|throttled]] to less than {{convert|15325|lbf|N|order=flip}} to maintain vehicle stability.<ref name=faa201311/>
A test flight program of thirty flights was proposed in 2013–2014, including two ''propulsive assist'' (parachutes plus thrusters) and two ''propulsive landing'' (no parachutes) on flights dropped from a helicopter at an altitude of approximately {{convert|10000|ft|m|sp=us}}. The other 26 test flights were projected to take off from a [[launch pad]]: eight to be ''propulsive assist hops'' (landing with parachutes plus thrusters) and 18 to be ''full propulsive hops'', similar to the [[
=== Falcon 9 booster post-mission flight tests ===
Line 200:
==== Landing attempts on drone ships ====
[[File:First stage of Jason-3 rocket (24423604506).jpg|thumb|First stage of [[Falcon 9 Flight 21]] descending over the floating landing platform, January 17, 2016, immediately prior to a soft touchdown followed by [[deflagration]] of the rocket after a landing leg failed to latch, causing the rocket to tip over.]][[Falcon 9 Flight 21]] launched the [[Jason-3]] satellite on January 17, 2016, and attempted to land on the [[autonomous spaceport drone ship|floating platform]] ''Just Read the Instructions'',<ref name=nbc20160107>{{cite news |url=http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innovation/spacex-plans-drone-ship-rocket-landing-jan-17-launch-n492471 |title=SpaceX Plans Drone Ship Rocket Landing for Jan. 17 Launch |publisher=[[NBC News]] |first=Devin |last=Coldewey |date=January 7, 2016 |access-date=January 8, 2016 |archive-date=December 1, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201134820/http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/innovation/spacex-plans-drone-ship-rocket-landing-jan-17-launch-n492471 |url-status=live }}</ref> located for the first time about {{convert|200|mi|km}} out in the [[Pacific Ocean]].<!-- press conference, Hans Koenigsmann speaking for SpaceX: they are not attempting the landing on the land landing site at VAFB SLC4W because they have not yet received approval from the regulatory authorities; will find a secondary source before adding to the article prose... --><!-- HK: they may try to give video coverage of the landing, but unsure they can do it from over the horizon, satellite links, etc. --> Approximately 9 minutes into the flight, the live video feed from the drone ship went down due to the loss of its lock on the uplink satellite. The vehicle landed smoothly onto the vessel but one of the four landing legs failed to lock properly, reportedly due to ice from the heavy pre-launch [[fog]] preventing a lockout [[collet]] from latching.<ref name=sfn20160118>{{cite web |title=SpaceX narrowly misses booster landing at sea |work=Spaceflight Now |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2016/01/18/spacex-narrowly-misses-booster-landing-at-sea/ |date=January 18, 2016 |access-date=January 18, 2016 |first=Stephen |last=Clark |archive-date=January 22, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160122203126/http://spaceflightnow.com/2016/01/18/spacex-narrowly-misses-booster-landing-at-sea/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Consequently the booster fell over shortly after touchdown and was destroyed in a [[deflagration]] upon impact with the pad.<ref name=gw20160117>{{cite news |last=Boyle |first=Alan |url=http://www.geekwire.com/2016/spacex-launches-jason-3-satellite-then-tries-landing-falcon-9-rocket-at-sea/ |title=SpaceX rocket launches satellite, but tips over during sea landing attempt |work=GeekWire |date=January 17, 2016 |access-date=January 18, 2016 |archive-date=January 30, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160130022126/http://www.geekwire.com/2016/spacex-launches-jason-3-satellite-then-tries-landing-falcon-9-rocket-at-sea/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=rud>{{cite web |url=https://www.instagram.com/p/BAqirNbwEc0/ |title=Flight 21 landing and breaking a leg |work=Instagram |first=Elon |last=Musk |author-link=Elon Musk |date=January 17, 2016 |access-date=June 5, 2016 |archive-date=December 11, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171211231212/https://www.instagram.com/p/BAqirNbwEc0/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
[[Falcon 9 Flight 22|Flight 22]] was carrying a heavy payload of {{convert|5271|kg|sigfig=2}} to [[geostationary transfer orbit]] (GTO). This was heavier than the previously advertised maximum lift capacity to GTO being made possible by going slightly [[subsynchronous orbit|subsynchronous]]. Following delays caused by failure of [[Falcon 9 Flight 19|Flight 19]], SpaceX agreed to provide extra thrust to the [[SES-9]] satellite to take it [[supersynchronous orbit|supersynchronous]].<ref name="sfn20160224">{{cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=February 24, 2016 |title=Falcon 9 rocket to give SES 9 telecom satellite an extra boost |url=http://spaceflightnow.com/2016/02/24/falcon-9-rocket-to-give-ses-9-telecom-satellite-an-extra-boost/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305104120/http://spaceflightnow.com/2016/02/24/falcon-9-rocket-to-give-ses-9-telecom-satellite-an-extra-boost/ |archive-date=March 5, 2016 |access-date=March 7, 2016 |work=Spaceflight Now |quote=''SES’s contract with SpaceX called for the rocket to deploy SES 9 into a "sub-synchronous" transfer orbit with an apogee around 16,155 miles (26,000 kilometers) in altitude. Such an orbit would require SES 9 to consume its own fuel to reach a circular 22,300-mile-high perch, a trek that Halliwell said was supposed to last 93 days. The change [SpaceX offered] in the Falcon 9’s launch profile will put SES 9 into an initial orbit with an apogee approximately 24,419 miles (39,300 kilometers) above Earth, a low point 180 miles (290 kilometers) up, and a track tilted about 28 degrees to the equator.''}}</ref> As a result of these factors, there was little propellant left to execute a full reentry and landing test with normal margins. Consequently the Falcon 9 first stage followed a [[ballistic trajectory]] after separation and re-entered the atmosphere at high velocity, making it less likely to land successfully.<ref name=sxPressKit20160223>{{cite web |url=http://www.spacex.com/sites/spacex/files/spacex_ses9_press_kit_final.pdf |title=SES-9 Mission |work=Press Kit |publisher=SpaceX |date=February 23, 2016 |access-date=February 24, 2016 |quote=This mission is going to a Geostationary Transfer Orbit. Following stage separation, the first stage of the Falcon 9 will attempt an experimental landing on the "Of Course I Still Love You" droneship. Given this mission’s unique GTO profile, a successful landing is not expected. |archive-date=July 27, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190727151524/https://www.spacex.com/sites/spacex/files/spacex_ses9_press_kit_final.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=sfn20160224/> The [[atmospheric re-entry]] and controlled descent were successful despite the higher aerodynamical constraints on the first stage due to extra speed. However the rocket was moving too fast and was destroyed when it collided with the drone ship. SpaceX collected valuable data on the extended flight envelope required to recover boosters from GTO missions.
Line 233:
====Falcon Heavy reusability====
The [[Falcon Heavy test flight]] had no contracted customer, and in order to limit the cost on such a flight, SpaceX targeted to have reused side-boosters. Boosters B1023 and B1025 that had been flown as a Falcon 9 configuration, were reconfigured and used as side boosters on the first flight of Falcon Heavy in February 2018, and then both landed side-by-side at almost the same time on the ground pads. Later Falcon Heavy flights used either new boosters, or side-boosters previously flown on a Falcon Heavy. SpaceX has been unable to recover the central core in any of the first three Falcon Heavy flights, but managed to recover all six side boosters.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/25/18743998/spacex-falcon-heavy-center-core-crash|title=SpaceX loses Falcon Heavy's center core in an otherwise successful launch|date=June 25, 2019|access-date=May 29, 2021|archive-date=February 8, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210208115526/https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/25/18743998/spacex-falcon-heavy-center-core-crash|url-status=live}}</ref>
==== Block 5 boosters ====
{{main|Falcon 9 Block 5}}
With a streak of 19 successful recovery attempts of the first stage from 2016 through to early 2018, SpaceX has focused on rapid reusability of first stage boosters. Block 3 and Block 4 proved economically feasible to be flown twice, as 11 such boosters have been reflown in 2017 and 2018. [[Falcon 9 Full Thrust Block 5|Block 5]] has been designed with multiple reuses in mind, up to 10 reuses with minimal inspection and up to 100 uses with refurbishment.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Seemangal |first=Robin |date=2018-05-04 |title=SpaceX Test-Fires New Falcon 9 Block 5 Rocket Ahead of Maiden Flight (Updated) |url=https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a20152543/spacex-test-fire-new-falcon-9-block-5/ |access-date=2024-05-10 |website=Popular Mechanics |language=en-US}}</ref> New aggressive reentry profiles were experimented with expendable Block 3 and Block 4 boosters in early 2018, to test out the limitations on the range of recoverable launch margins that are potential for future Block 5.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-old-gen-falcon-9-ready-rapid-reuse-block-5-rocket/|title=SpaceX expends "old-gen" Falcon 9 to ready for upcoming rapid reuse rocket|website=www.teslarati.com|date=April 3, 2018 |access-date=April 6, 2018|archive-date=April 7, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180407053456/https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-old-gen-falcon-9-ready-rapid-reuse-block-5-rocket/|url-status=live}}</ref> On 9 May 2021, [[List of Falcon 9 first-stage boosters#B1051|B1051]] became the first booster to be launched and landed for the tenth time, achieving one of SpaceX's milestone goals for reuse.<ref>{{cite web|title=SpaceX flies historic 10th mission of a Falcon 9 as Starlink constellation expands|url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/05/historic-10th-falcon9-reflight/|website=NASASpaceFlight|access-date=9 May 2021|date=9 May 2021|archive-date=May 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210516121203/https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/05/historic-10th-falcon9-reflight/|url-status=live}}</ref> {{As of|
=== Fairing reuse ===
Line 259:
By April 2021, SpaceX had abandoned the experimental program to attempt recovery of dry payload fairings under [[parachute descent]] in a net on a [[platform supply vessel|fast ship]]. SpaceX decided to operationalize "wet recovery" of fairings on future Falcon 9 flights, having found that they can clean, refurbish, and reuse such fairings more economically.<ref name="ars20210409">{{cite news |last=Berger |first=Eric |date=9 April 2021 |title=Rocket Report: SpaceX abandons catching fairings |url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/rocket-report-spacex-abandons-catching-fairings-ula-bets-on-upper-stages/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210420105824/https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/rocket-report-spacex-abandons-catching-fairings-ula-bets-on-upper-stages/ |archive-date=April 20, 2021 |access-date=28 April 2021 |work=[[Ars Technica]]}}</ref> SpaceX released ''Miss Tree'' and ''Miss Chief'' from their contracts and purchased two ships for fairing recovery operations as well as for towing and supporting [[Autonomous spaceport drone ship|droneships]] on the east coast. These two ships were named in honour of [[Demo-2]] astronauts [[Doug Hurley]] and [[Bob Behnken]] as ''Doug''<ref>{{Cite web |title=DOUG (Offshore Supply Ship) Registered in USA – Vessel details, Current position and Voyage information – IMO 9529889, MMSI 368485000, Call Sign WDF2598 |url=https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/ships/shipid:454774/mmsi:368485000/imo:9529889/vessel:DOUG |access-date=2021-08-25 |website=www.marinetraffic.com |language=en}}</ref> and ''Bob''. The earlier names of the ships Bob and Doug were Ella G and Ingrid respectively. Currently, Doug is operating at Port Canaveral while Bob is at Tampa undergoing construction.
By 26 May 2021, SpaceX had launched 40 flights that reflew at least one previously-flown fairing half, and one fairing had flown on five different flights, having been recovered and cleaned four previous times. As of now, SN152 is the oldest active fairing half still in use, while SN185 is the most flown (32 flights) active fairing half. On the other hand SN168 is the oldest, most-flown (28 flights) passive fairing half.<ref name=sn20210526>{{cite news |title=SpaceX sets Falcon 9 fairing reuse mark with Starlink launch |url=https://spacenews.com/spacex-sets-falcon-9-fairing-reuse-mark-with-starlink-launch/ |work=[[SpaceNews]] |last=Foust|first=Jeff |date=26 May 2021 |access-date=28 May 2021}}</ref>
=== Second-stage reuse ===
Line 267:
The Starship is planned to replace all existing SpaceX launch and space vehicles after the mid-2020s: [[Falcon 9]], [[Falcon Heavy]] and the [[Dragon spacecraft]], aimed initially at the Earth-orbit [[Space launch market competition|launch market]] but with capability to support [[Beyond Earth orbit|long-duration spaceflight]] in the [[cislunar]] and [[Exploration of Mars|Mars mission]] environments.<ref name=musk20170929>
{{cite AV media | url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdUX3ypDVwI | people=Elon Musk | title=Becoming a Multiplanet Species |date=29 September 2017 |medium=video | ___location=68th annual meeting of the International Astronautical Congress in Adelaide, Australia | publisher=SpaceX | via=YouTube | access-date=8 March 2018}}</ref> Both stages will be fully reusable. The integrated [[
=== Reuse of Dragon capsules ===
Line 301:
The first Super Heavy booster named BN1 (booster number 1) finished construction on 8 March 2021, but it had not received engines.<ref>{{cite news|last=Bergin|first=Chris|date=29 March 2021|title=Starship SN11 lands in bits as SpaceX refine forward plan|publisher=NASASpaceFlight.com|url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/03/starship-sn11-returns-super-heavy-bn1-rollout-follow/|url-status=live|access-date=18 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210814004802/https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/03/starship-sn11-returns-super-heavy-bn1-rollout-follow/|archive-date=14 August 2021}}</ref> On 30 March 2021, SN11 exploded in midair without a confirmed explanation because of the dense fog at the launch site.<ref>{{cite news|last=Griffin|first=Andrew|date=1 April 2021|title=Elon Musk confirms SpaceX Starship exploded in 'crater'|newspaper=The Independent|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/space/spacex-launch-elon-musk-starship-sn11-twitter-b1824437.html|url-status=dead|access-date=18 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210401083208/https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/space/spacex-launch-elon-musk-starship-sn11-twitter-b1824437.html|archive-date=1 April 2021}}</ref> A possible explanation is that an engine might have burned the test article's [[avionics]] and could have caused a [[hard start]] on the engine's turbopump.<ref>{{cite news|last=Wall|first=Mike|date=5 April 2021|title=SpaceX identifies cause of Starship SN11 prototype's crash|publisher=Space.com|url=https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-sn11-crash-cause|url-status=live|access-date=18 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210507050858/https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-sn11-crash-cause|archive-date=7 May 2021}}</ref> After the launch, SpaceX skipped SN12, SN13, SN14, and BN2, and incorporated obsolete test articles' improvements to SN15 instead.<ref name=":8">{{cite news|last=Wall|first=Mike|date=13 April 2021|title=SpaceX's SN15 Starship prototype rolls out to launch pad|publisher=Space.com|url=https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-sn15-launch-pad|url-status=live|access-date=18 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210424192858/https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-sn15-launch-pad|archive-date=24 April 2021}}</ref> On 5 May 2021, the test article flew the same flight path as previous test articles and [[Soft landing (aeronautics)|soft landed]] successfully.<ref name=":18">{{cite news|last=Amos|first=Jonathan|date=5 May 2021|title=SpaceX Starship prototype makes clean landing|publisher=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-57004604|url-status=live|access-date=18 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506070737/https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-57004604|archive-date=6 May 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Gorman|first=Steve|date=6 May 2021|title=Elon Musk's SpaceX Starship completes successful launch and landing after several fiery failures|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/spacex-starship-rocket-prototype-achieves-first-safe-landing-2021-05-06/|url-status=live|access-date=29 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506040354/https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/spacex-starship-rocket-prototype-achieves-first-safe-landing-2021-05-06/|archive-date=6 May 2021}}</ref> On 20 July 2021, BN3 fired its engines for the only time.<ref name=":15">{{cite news|last=Tariq|first=Malik|date=20 July 2021|title=SpaceX test fires massive Super Heavy booster for Starship for 1st time (video)|publisher=Space.com|url=https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-super-heavy-rocket-booster-engine-test|url-status=live|access-date=11 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210803210509/https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-super-heavy-rocket-booster-engine-test|archive-date=3 August 2021}}</ref> As of October 2021, SN15, SN16, and BN3 had been retired and displayed.<ref name=":18" /><ref>{{cite news|last=Bergin|first=Chris|date=3 July 2021|title=Booster 3 opens Super Heavy test campaign as orbital vehicles prepare to stack|publisher=NASASpaceFlight.com|url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/07/booster-3-super-heavy-test-campaign/|url-status=live|access-date=18 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210711105222/https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/07/booster-3-super-heavy-test-campaign/|archive-date=11 July 2021}}</ref>
After the flight of SN15 SpaceX ended the suborbital flight campaign and tested prototypes on the ground for almost two years. [[
Booster 7 and Ship 24 launched for a first integrated flight test on 20 April 2023, planned to fly 3/4 of an orbit and reenter over the ocean near Hawaii. The rocket cleared the launch pad and flew for three minutes but several booster engines failed during the flight and the rocket eventually lost control before stage separation, reaching a maximum altitude of {{Cvt|39|km|mi}}. The [[flight termination system]] was triggered and a subsequent explosion destroyed the vehicle.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Malik |first1=Tariq |last2=Wall |first2=Mike |date=2023-04-20 |title=SpaceX's 1st Starship launches on epic test flight, explodes in 'rapid unscheduled disassembly' |url=https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-first-space-launch |access-date=2023-11-15 |website=Space.com |language=en}}</ref> The launch broke the concrete pad under the launch mount, resulting in SpaceX replacing it with a water-cooled steel plate for subsequent launches.<ref>{{cite web |title=Why did SpaceX Starship's debut launch cause so much damage to the pad?|website=[[Space.com]] |date=April 24, 2023 |url=https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-damage-starbase-launch-pad|access-date=2023-11-15}}</ref>
Line 308:
Booster 10 and Ship 28 were flown on [[SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 3|Integrated Flight Test 3]], on March 14, 2024.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=STARSHIP'S THIRD FLIGHT TEST |url=https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-3 |access-date=2024-03-27 |website=SpaceX |language=en}}</ref> It had a different trajectory than the previous two launches, targeting a hard splashdown of the ship in the Indian Ocean.<ref name=":0" /> During ascent and boostback, there were no engine failures, though during the landing burn, all but one of B10s center engines failed.<ref name=":0" /> S28 had an aborted raptor relight attempt, and burned up during reentry.<ref name=":0" />
On June 6, 2024, SpaceX launched Booster 11 and Ship 29 on the [[Starship flight test 4|IFT-4]] mission. After shutting off one engine shortly after liftoff, Starship continued on a trajectory similar to IFT-3, only without the attempted raptor relight. After performing its boostback burn and jettisoning the hot-staging ring, Super Heavy successfully reentered and landed,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Foust |first=Jeff |date=2024-06-06 |title=Starship survives reentry during fourth test flight |url=https://spacenews.com/starship-survives-reentry-during-fourth-test-flight/ |access-date=2024-10-29 |website=SpaceNews |language=en-US}}</ref> with SpaceX executive [[Bill Gerstenmaier]] saying that it landed with half a centimeter of accuracy. Starship continued to its planned orbit and began reentry around 40 minutes later. It demonstrated far better attitude control than Ship 28 but had plasma burn through its flaps during the more intense parts of reentry.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wall |first=Mike |date=2024-06-06 |title=SpaceX Starship launches on nail-biting 4th test flight of world's most powerful rocket (video, photos) |url=https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-flight-4-test-launch-success |access-date=2024-10-29 |website=Space.com |language=en}}</ref> Despite the significant damage to the flaps, which Starship relied on for aerodynamic control, a successful water landing was achieved, albeit 6 kilometers off target.
Booster 12 and Ship 30 launched on October 13, 2024. The booster kept all thirty three engines lit until stage separation, before performing a successful boostback burn.<ref name="nsf20241012">{{Cite web |last=Weber |first=Ryan |date=2024-10-12 |title=SpaceX Catches a Super Heavy Booster During a Milestone Flight 5 |url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2024/10/starship-flight-5-catch/ |access-date=2024-10-14 |website=NASASpaceFlight.com |language=en-US}}</ref> The vehicle reentered, and was successfully caught by the launch tower.<ref name="nsf20241012" /> Ship 30 reached the desired trajectory, and retained attitude control until entry.<ref name="nsf20241012" /> It suffered minimal damage to the flaps during reentry, and achieved a successful landing burn on target.<ref name="nsf202410122">{{Cite web |last=Weber |first=Ryan |date=2024-10-12 |title=SpaceX Catches a Super Heavy Booster During a Milestone Flight 5 |url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2024/10/starship-flight-5-catch/ |access-date=2024-10-14 |website=NASASpaceFlight.com |language=en-US}}</ref>
<gallery mode="packed" widths="150" heights="150" caption="Pictures of Starship test articles">
File:Mk1 starship.jpg|alt=Photograph of equipment in front of white tents, with a steel nose cone at the back|Starship Mk1's nose cone near construction tents▼
File:SpaceX Starhopper.jpg|alt=Photograph of a short steel rocket stage with its fins touching the ground|''Starhopper'' in construction
▲File:Mk1 starship.jpg|alt=Photograph of equipment in front of white tents, with a steel nose cone at the back|Starship Mk1's nose cone near construction tents
File:Starship sn5.jpg|alt=Photograph of a crane hooking onto a steel vessel body|A crane lifting Starship SN5
File:Tanksn7.1.jpg|alt=Photograph of a steel tank|Starship SN7's tank
Line 317 ⟶ 321:
File:Starship SN20 getting a tile inspection.jpg|alt=Photograph of a worker on an aerial work platform repairing a spacecraft's black heatshield|A worker examining Starship SN20's ceramic tiles
File:StarshipLaunch (crop 2-3).jpg|Booster 7 and Ship 24 in flight
File:Starship-IFT2-ascent.jpg|Ship 25 and Booster 9
File:SpaceX Starship booster landing approach IFT-5.jpg|Booster 12 descending towards the launch tower
</gallery>
Line 323 ⟶ 328:
{{Portal|Spaceflight}}
* [[New Shepard]], a sub-orbital VTVL system
* [[SpaceX Grasshopper|Grasshopper]]
==Notes==
| |||