BattleTech Trading Card Game: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:17, 9 October 2024

Latest revision as of 23:25, 11 August 2025

(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 45:

After that, the game released several [[expansion set]]s:

* [[BattleTech: Counterstrike|Counterstrike]] (April 1997)<ref name="Duelist4">{{Citation |last=Cyznyk |first=Ace |title=More Bang for Your Buck |date=October 1997 |newspaper=The Duelist |issue=#19 |pages=58–59}}</ref><ref name=":0" />

* Mercenaries (August 1997) <ref name="Duelist4" /><ref name=":0" />

* Mechwarrior (August 1997) <ref name=":0" />

Line 53:

==Reception==

InSteve theFaragher Octoberreviewed 1997''BattleTech'' edition offor ''[[DragonArcane (magazine)|DragonArcane]]'' (Issue 240)magazine, [[Rickrating Swan]]it likeda this7 collectibleout of card10 gameoverall, callingand itstated that "simpleNot (muchone easier,of inRichard factGarfield's best games, thanthis theis ''Magic:over-reliant Theon Gathering''previous game,successes designedand bynot theany samebetter guy)than andthe addictiveoriginal (which''BattleTech''. meansIt's youstill betterjolly startclever, savingthough, upand forgood thefun boosters)to play."<ref name=dragon240"Arcane15">{{cite journal | last =Swan Faragher |first=Rick|author-link=Rick Swan| date=October 1997Steve | title =Roleplaying Games Reviews | journal = [[DragonArcane (magazine)|DragonArcane]]|publisher=[[TSR (company)|TSR, Inc.]]|issue =240 15 | pages =11462-63 |date=January 1997}}</ref>

In Issue 1 of ''Backstab'', Stéphane Bura liked some of the game mechanics, but ultimately found that the game's biggest fault was the "poor quality of the composition and design of the cards" compared to rival CCGs ''[[Netrunner]]'' and ''[[Mirage (Magic: The Gathering)|Mirage]]''. Bura concluded by giving the game a below average rating of 6 out of 10.<ref name="bs">{{cite magazine|last=Bura|first=Stéphane |date=January–February 1997|title=Critiques|magazine=Backstab|issue=1|pages=51|url =https://archive.org/details/backstab-magazine-french-01/page/n49/mode/2up | access-date=2021-07-21|language=fr}}</ref>

In the October 1997 edition of ''[[Dragon (magazine)|Dragon]]'' (Issue 240), [[Rick Swan]] liked this collectible card game, calling it "simple (much easier, in fact, than the ''Magic: The Gathering'' game, designed by the same guy) and addictive (which means you better start saving up for the boosters)."<ref name=dragon240>{{cite journal|last=Swan|first=Rick|author-link=Rick Swan| date=October 1997 |title=Roleplaying Reviews|journal=[[Dragon (magazine)|Dragon]]|publisher=[[TSR (company)|TSR, Inc.]]|issue=240|pages=114}}</ref>

The ''Arsenal'' expansion, which introduced a new card type, vehicles, resulted in the need for extensive errata and has been credited with bringing the game to its end.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Seavey|first=John|date=2009-10-22|title=Fraggmented: Games Past: Battletech TCG|url=https://fraggmented.blogspot.com/2009/10/games-past-battletech-tcg.html|access-date=2021-04-16|website=Fraggmented}}</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=July 2021}}

==Reviews==

*''Arcane'' #15 (January 1997)

*''[[:fr:Backstab|Backstab]]'' #9 (Arsenal)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://archive.org/details/backstab-magazine-french-09/page/n23/mode/2up | title=Backstab Magazine (French) Issue 09 }}</ref>

*''[[:fr:Backstab|Backstab]]'' #11 (Commander's Edition)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://archive.org/details/backstab-011/page/70/mode/2up | title=Backstab #011 | date=1998 }}</ref>

==References==