Content deleted Content added
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 32:
* Reduced Sensitivity to Noise: Local thresholding can be less sensitive to noise compared to global thresholding, as the thresholding decision is based on local statistics rather than the entire image.
=== Examples of Algorithms for Local
* Niblack's Method:<ref>{{Cite book |first=Wayne |last=Niblack |title=An introduction to digital image processing |date=1986 |publisher=Prentice-Hall International |isbn=0-13-480600-X |oclc=1244113797 |pages=115-116 }}</ref> Niblack's algorithm computes a local threshold for each pixel based on the mean and standard deviation of the pixel's neighborhood. It adjusts the threshold based on the local characteristics of the image, making it suitable for handling variations in illumination.
* Bernsen's Method:<ref>Chaki, Nabendu., Shaikh, Soharab Hossain., Saeed, Khalid. Exploring Image Binarization Techniques. Germany: Springer India, 2014.{{pn|date=April 2024}}</ref> Bernsen's algorithm calculates the threshold for each pixel by considering the local contrast within a neighborhood. It uses a fixed window size and is robust to noise and variations in background intensity.
* Sauvola's Method:<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sauvola |first1=J. |last2=Pietikäinen |first2=M. |title=Adaptive document image binarization |journal=Pattern Recognition |date=February 2000 |volume=33 |issue=2 |pages=225–236 |doi=10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00055-2 |bibcode=2000PatRe..33..225S }}</ref> Sauvola's algorithm extends Niblack's method by incorporating a dynamic factor that adapts the threshold based on the local contrast and mean intensity. This adaptive factor improves the binarization results, particularly in regions with varying contrasts.
==Extensions of binary thresholding==
| |||