Content deleted Content added
Sorry, this page is not an Agile ad - there are benefits to CC Undid revision 403024123 by Walter Görlitz (talk) |
m →Advantages: HTTP to HTTPS for Blogspot |
||
(125 intermediate revisions by 74 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Derogatory term in software development}}
{{External links|date=January 2009}}▼
{{multiple issues|
{{procon|date=July 2013}}
{{original research|date=January 2011}}
{{globalize|date=January 2011}}
}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2016}}
'''Cowboy coding''' is
A cowboy coder can be a lone developer or part of a group of developers working with minimal process or discipline.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Scott |first1=Welker |title=cowboy coding |url=https://searchsoftwarequality.techtarget.com/definition/cowboy-coding |website=searchsoftwarequality |publisher=TechTarget |access-date=2 March 2022}}</ref> Usually it occurs when there is little participation by business users, or fanned by management that controls only non-development aspects of the project, such as the broad targets, timelines, scope, and visuals (the "what", but not the "how").{{Citation needed|date=January 2011}}
"Cowboy coding" commonly sees usage as a [[pejorative|derogatory]] term when contrasted with more structured [[software development methodology|software development methodologies]].
==
In cowboy coding, the lack of formal [[software project management]] methodologies may be indicative (though not necessarily) of a project's small size or experimental nature.<ref>Hughes, Bob and Cotterell, Mike (2006). ''Software Project Management'', pp.283-289. McGraw Hill Education, Berkshire. {{ISBN
===
Lack of [[estimation (project management)|estimation]] or implementation planning
===
Cowboy coding can be common at the hobbyist or student level where developers
This can result in underestimating time required for learning
==== Uncertain design requirements ====▼
Custom software applications, even when using a proven development cycle, can experience problems with the client concerning requirements. Cowboy coding can accentuate this problem by not scaling the requirements to a reasonable timeline, and may result in unused or unusable components being created before the project is finished. Similarly, projects with less tangible clients (often experimental projects, see [[independent game development]]) may begin with code and never a formal analysis of the design requirements. Lack of design analysis may lead to incorrect or insufficient technology choices, possibly requiring the developer to [[porting|port]] or rewrite their software in order for the project to be completed.▼
==== Incompleteness ====▼
== Advantages of Cowboy Coding ==▼
▲Custom software applications, even when using a proven development cycle, can experience problems with the client concerning requirements. Cowboy coding can accentuate this problem by not scaling the requirements to a reasonable timeline, and
Many software development models, such as [[Extreme Programming]], use an incremental approach which stresses that the software must be releasable at the end of each iteration. Non-managed projects may have few [[unit testing|unit tests]] or working iterations, leaving an incomplete project unusable. As such, agile methodologies have been compared to cowboy coding but agile has formal processes, procedures, measurement, project management and other oversight while cowboy coding has none of this.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.stickyminds.com/sites/default/files/article/file/2013/XUS22546409file1_0.doc |title=Exploring Agile Development | work=Pragmatic Software Newsletter |issue=March 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.stickyminds.com/better-software-magazine/dont-just-break-software-make-software|title=StickyMinds - Don't Just Break Software. Make Software|work=StickyMinds|accessdate=February 2, 2016}}</ref>
* Developers maintain a free-form working environment that may encourage experimentation, learning, and free distribution of results.
* It allows developers to cross architectural and/or tiered boundaries to resolve design limitations and defects.
* As discussing architectures, writing specifications and reviewing the code all take their time, a single developer (if sufficient) may well produce a working application faster by cowboy coding. Tasks like research or prototyping may not require the code quality more complex methods provide.
*
▲* By coding in their own time, a hobby project may come to fruition which otherwise wouldn't have<ref>K, Alex. Google's "20 percent time" in action http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/05/googles-20-percent-time-in-action.html, Official Google Blog, 2006-5-18</ref>.
==See also==
* [[Hacker (programmer subculture)|Hacker]], a subculture that relies on the creativity of individual programmers
* [[Code monkey (disambiguation)|Code monkey]], a pejorative term for programmers who are employed to write simple or repetitive code
* [[Self-employment]]
* [[Indie game development]]
* {{Section link|Cowboy|Negative associations}}
== External links ==▼
* [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CowboyCoder Cowboy Coder] definition at Wards Wiki▼
* [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CowboyCoding Cowboy Coding] definition at Wards Wiki▼
▲== References ==
<references/>
▲* [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CowboyCoder Cowboy Coder] definition at
[[Category:Software development philosophies]]▼
▲* [http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CowboyCoding Cowboy Coding] definition at
* {{cite web|url=http://cowboyprogramming.com/2007/01/11/delving-into-cowboy-programming/|title=Delving into Cowboy Programming|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20190323115724/http://cowboyprogramming.com/2007/01/11/delving-into-cowboy-programming/|archivedate=2019-03-23}}
{{independent media}}
▲[[Category:Software development philosophies]]
[[Category:Computer programming folklore]]
[[Category:Software engineering folklore]]
|