RTP Control Protocol: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m format RFCs
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{short description|Sister protocol of the Real-time Transport Protocol that provides control information}}
{{distinguish|Real Time Streaming Protocol}}
{{Infobox networking protocol
| title = RTP Control Protocol
| logo =
| logo alt =
| image =
| image alt =
| caption =
| is stack = No
| abbreviation = RTCP
| purpose = Provide feedback on the [[quality of service]]
| developer = [[Columbia University]]
| date = {{Start date and age|2003|07}}
| based on =
| influenced =
| osilayer =
| ports =
| rfcs = {{IETF RFC|3550|plainlink=yes}}
| hardware =
}}
 
The '''RTP Control Protocol''' ('''RTCP''') is a sisterbinary-encoded protocol[[out-of-band signaling|out-of-band]] [[signaling protocol]] that functions alongside the [[Real-time Transport Protocol]] (RTP). Its basic functionality and packet structure is defined in RFC 3550. RTCP provides [[Out-of-band signaling|out-of-band]] statistics and control information for an RTP session. It partners with RTP in the delivery and packaging of multimedia data, but does not transport any media data itself.
 
The primary function of RTCP is to provide feedback on the [[quality of service]] (QoS) in media distribution by periodically sending statistics information such as transmitted [[Octet (computing)|octet]] and packet counts, [[packet loss]], [[packet delay variation]], and [[round-trip delay time]] to participants in a streaming multimedia session. An application may use this information to control quality of service parameters, perhaps by limiting flow, or using a different [[codec]].
 
{{Internet protocol suite|application=RTP Control Protocol}}
{{IPstack}}
 
== Protocol functions ==
Typically RTP will be sent on an even-numbered [[User Datagram Protocol|UDP]] port, with RTCP messages being sent over the next higher odd-numbered port.<ref>{{Ref RFC |3605, ''Real Time Control Protocol (RTCP) attribute in Session Description Protocol (SDP)'', C. Huitema, Microsoft (October 2003)</ref>}}
 
RTCP itself does not provide any flow encryption or authentication methods. Such mechanisms may be implemented, for example, with the [[Secure Real-time Transport Protocol]] (SRTP) defined in{{Ref RFC |3711.}}
 
RTCP provides basic functions expected to be implemented in all RTP sessions:
*The primary function of RTCP is to gather statistics on quality aspects of the media distribution during a session and transmit this data to the session media source and other session participants. Such information may be used by the source for adaptive media encoding ([[codec]]) and detection of transmission faults. If the session is carried over a multicast network, this permits non-intrusive session quality monitoring.
*RTCP provides canonical end-point identifiers ([[CNAME]]) to all session participants. Although a source identifier (SSRC) of an RTP stream is expected to be unique, the instantaneous binding of source identifiers to end-points may change during a session. The CNAME establishes unique identification of end-points across an application instance (multiple use of media tools) and for third-party monitoring.
*Provisioning of session control functions. RTCP is a convenient means to reach all session participants, whereas RTP itself is not. RTP is only transmitted by a media source.
 
RTCP reports are expected to be sent by all participants, even in a multicast session which may involve thousands of recipients. Such traffic will increase proportionally with the number of participants. Thus, to avoid network congestion, the protocol must include session bandwidth management. This is achieved by dynamically controlling the frequency of report transmissions. RTCP bandwidth usage should generally not exceed 5% of the total session bandwidth. Furthermore, 25% of the RTCP bandwidth should be reserved to media sources at all times, so that in large conferences new participants can receive the CNAME identifiers of the senders without excessive delay.
 
The RTCP reporting interval is randomized to prevent unintended synchronization of reporting. The recommended minimum RTCP report interval per station is 5 seconds. Stations should not transmit RTCP reports more often than once every 5 seconds.
 
==Packet header==
{{APHD|start|title=RTCP packet header{{Ref RFC|3550}}}}
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center"
{{APHD|0|bits1=2|field1=Version|field2=P|bits3=5|field3=RC|bits4=8|field4=PT|bits5=16|field5=Length}}
|+RTCP packet header
{{APHD|4|bits1=32|field1=SSRC Identifier}}
!''Offsets''
{{APHD|end}}
!Octet
;{{APHD|def|name=Version|length=2 bits|text=Identifies the version of RTP, which is the same in RTCP packets as in RTP data packets. The version defined by this specification is two (2).}}
! colspan="8" |0
;{{APHD|def|name=Padding|short=P|length=1 bit|text=Indicates if there are extra padding bytes at the end of the RTP packet. Padding may be used to fill up a block of certain size, for example as required by an encryption algorithm. The last byte of the padding contains the number of padding bytes that were added (including itself).}}
! colspan="8" |1
;{{APHD|def|name=Reception Report Count|short=RC|length=5 bits|text=The number of reception report blocks contained in this packet. A value of zero is valid.}}
! colspan="8" |2
;{{APHD|def|name=Packet Type|short=PT|length=8 bits|text=Contains a constant to identify RTCP packet type.}}
! colspan="8" |3
;{{APHD|def|name=Length|length=16 bits|text=Indicates the length of this RTCP packet (including the header itself) in 32-bit units minus one.}}
|-
;{{APHD|def|name=SSRC Identifier|length=32 bits|text=''Synchronization Source Identifier'' uniquely identifies the source of a stream.}}
!Octet
! Bit {{efn|Bits are ordered most significant to least significant; bit offset 0 is the most significant bit of the first octet. Octets are transmitted in [[network order]]. Bit transmission order is medium dependent.}}
! 0
!1
! colspan="1" | 2
! colspan="1" | 3
!4
!5
!6
!7
! colspan="1" | 8
!9
!10
!11
!12
!13
!14
!15
!16
!17
!18
!19
!20
!21
!22
!23
!24
!25
!26
!27
!28
!29
!30
!31
|- align="center"
!
! 0
| colspan="2" |Version
| colspan="1" |P
| colspan="5" |RC
| colspan="8" |PT
| colspan="16" |length
|- align="center"
!
! colspan="1" |32
| colspan="32" |SSRC
|- align="center"
|}
 
Note that multiple reports can be concatenated into a single compound RTCP packet, each with its own packet header.
* '''Version''': (2 bits) Identifies the version of RTP, which is the same in RTCP packets as in RTP data packets. The version defined by this specification is two (2).<ref name=RFC3550>{{IETF RFC|3550}}</ref>
* '''P (Padding)''': (1 bits) Used to indicate if there are extra padding bytes at the end of the RTP packet. A padding might be used to fill up a block of certain size, for example as required by an encryption algorithm. The last byte of the padding contains the number of padding bytes that were added (including itself).<ref name=RFC3550/>
* '''RC (Reception report count )''': (5 bits) The number of reception report blocks contained in this packet. A value of zero is valid.<ref name=RFC3550/>
* '''PT (Packet type) ''': (8 bits) Contains a constant to identify RTCP packet type.<ref name=RFC3550/>
* '''Length''': (16 bits) Indicates the length of this RTCP packet.<ref name=RFC3550/>
* '''SSRC''': (32 bits) Synchronization source identifier uniquely identifies the source of a stream.<ref name=RFC3550/>
 
==Message types==
RTCP distinguishes several types of packets: ''sender report'', ''receiver report'', ''source description'', and ''goodbye''. In addition, the protocol is extensible and allows application-specific RTCP packets. A standards-based extension of RTCP is the ''extended report'' packet type introduced by.{{Ref RFC |3611.<ref>RFC 3611, ''RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)'', T. Friedman (Ed.), R. Caceres, A. Clark (Ed.), The Internet Society (November 2003)</ref>}}
 
;Sender report (SR): The sender report is sent periodically by the active senders in a conference to report transmission and reception statistics for all RTP packets sent during the interval. The sender report includes two distinct timestamps, an absolute timestamp, whichrepresented isusing the numbertimestamp format of the Network Time Protocol (NTP) (which is in seconds elapsedrelative sinceto midnight UTC on 1 January 11900) and an RTP timestamp that corresponds to the same time as the NTP timestamp, 1900but in the same units and with the same random offset as the RTP timestamps in data packets described by this Sender Report.{{Ref RFC|3550|rp=12,37}} The absolute timestamp allows the receiver to synchronize RTP messages. It is particularly important when both audio and video are transmitted simultaneously, because audio and video streams use independent relative timestamps.
;Receiver report (RR): The receiver report is for passive participants, those that do not send RTP packets. The report informs the sender and other receivers about the quality of service.
;Source description (SDES): The Source Description message is used to send the CNAME item to session participants. It may also be used to provide additional information such as the name, e-mail address, telephone number, and address of the owner or controller of the source.
Line 97 ⟶ 65:
 
==Scalability in large deployments==
In large-scale applications, such as in [[Internet Protocol Televisiontelevision]] (IPTV), very long delays (minutes to hours) between RTCP reports may occur, because of the RTCP bandwidth control mechanism required to control congestion (see [[#Protocol functions| Protocol functions]]). Acceptable frequencies are usually less than one per minute. This affords the potential of inappropriate reporting of the relevant statistics by the receiver or causecauses evaluation by the media sender to be inaccurate relative to the current state of the session. Methods have been introduced to alleviate the problems:<ref>Vít Novotný, Dan Komosný, ''Large-Scale RTCP Feedback Optimization'', Journal of Networks, Vol.3 (3), March 2008</ref> RTCP filtering, RTCP biasing and [[RTCP hierarchical aggregation|hierarchical aggregation]].<ref>
[http://www.academypublisher.com/jnw/vol03/no03/jnw03030110.pdf Realtime control protocol and its improvements for Internet Protocol Television]</ref>
 
===Hierarchical aggregation===
The Hierarchical Aggregation (or also known as RTCP feedback hierarchy) is an optimization of the RTCP feedback model and its aim is to shift the maximum number of users limit further together with [[quality of service]] (QoS) measurement.<ref name=HA1/><ref name=HA2/> The [[RTCP]] [[Bandwidth (computing)|bandwidth]] is constant and takes just 5% of session bandwidth. Therefore, the reporting interval about QoS depends, among others, on a number of session members and for very large sessions it can become very high (minutes or even hours)<ref name=RFC3550/>.{{Ref RFC|3550}} However, the acceptable interval is about 10 seconds of reporting. Bigger values would cause time-shifted and very inaccurate reported status about the current session status and any optimization made by the sender could even have a negative effect toon network or QoS conditions.
 
The Hierarchical Aggregation is used with [[Source-Specific Multicast]] where only a single source is allowed, i.e. [[IPTV]]. Another type of multicast could be [[Any-Source Multicast]] but it is not so suitable for large-scale applications with huge number of users.
 
{{asofas of|June 2007}}, only the most modern IPTV systems use Hierarchical aggregation.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}}
 
=== Feedback Target ===
Feedback Target is a new type of member that has been firstly introduced by the Internet Draft draft-ietf-avt-rtcpssm-13<ref name=HA4/>.{{Ref RFC|5760}} The Hierarchical Aggregation method has extended its functionality. The function of this member is to receive Receiver Reports (RR) (see [[RTCP]]) and retransmit summarized RR packets, so-called Receiver Summary Information (RSI)<ref{{Ref name=HA4/>RFC|5760}} to a sender (in case of single -level hierarchy).
 
==Standards documents==
* {{Sum RFC|3550}}
* {{IETF RFC|3550}}, Standard 64, ''RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications''
 
==See also==
* [[Streaming media]]
* [[QualityVoice ofover serviceIP]]
* [[Voice over Internet Protocol]]
 
==Notes==
{{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
 
==References==
Line 125 ⟶ 89:
<ref name=HA1>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070509035431/http://adela.utko.feec.vutbr.cz/projects/publications/#2 KOMOSNY D., NOVOTNY V. Tree Structure for Specific-Source Multicast with feedback Aggregation, in ICN07 - The Sixth International Conference on Networking . Martinique, 2007] {{ISBN|0-7695-2805-8}}</ref>
<ref name=HA2>[https://web.archive.org/web/20070509035431/http://adela.utko.feec.vutbr.cz/projects/publications/#2 NOVOTNY, V., KOMOSNY, D. Optimization of Large-Scale RTCP Feedback Reporting in ICWMC 2007. ICWMC 2007 - The Third International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications. Guadeloupe, 2007] {{ISBN|0-7695-2796-5}}</ref>
<ref name=HA4>RFC 5760 J. Ott, J. Chesterfield, E. Schooler. "RTCP Extensions for Single-Source Multicast Sessions with Unicast Feedback"</ref>
}}
 
==Further reading==
* {{cite book|last=Perkins|first=Colin|title=RTP|publisher=Addison-Wesley|year=2003|pages=414|isbn=978-0-672-32249-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OM7YJAy9_m8C}}
* {{cite book |last=Peterson |first=Larry L. |author2=Bruce S. Davie |title=Computer Networks |publisher=Morgan Kaufmann |year=2007 |edition=4 |pages=806 |isbn=978-0-12-374013-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zGVVuO-6w3IC}}
* {{cite book|publisher=Javvin Technologies | title=Network Protocols Handbook |chapter=RTCP |chapterurlchapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D_GrQa2ZcLwC&pg=PA145 | year=2005 | isbn=978-0-9740945-2-6}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Rtp Control Protocol}}