Primitive recursive function: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Variants: The Fischer, Fischer, Beigel paper is complete rubbish. They reprove things known decades earlier, and conjecture things also refuted decades earlier.
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Function computable with bounded loops}}
{{CS1 config|mode=cs2}}
In [[computability theory]], a '''primitive recursive function''' is, roughly speaking, a function that can be computed by a [[computer program]] whose [[loop (programming)|loops]] are all [[For loop|"for" loops]] (that is, an upper bound of the number of iterations of every loop is fixed before entering the loop). Primitive recursive functions form a strict [[subset]] of those [[general recursive function]]s that are also [[total function]]s.
 
Line 25 ⟶ 26:
| 4=''Composition operator'' <math>\circ\,</math> (also called the ''substitution operator''): Given an ''m''-ary function <math>h(x_1,\ldots,x_m)\,</math> and ''m'' ''k''-ary functions <math>g_1(x_1,\ldots,x_k),\ldots,g_m(x_1,\ldots, x_k)</math>: <math display="block">h \circ (g_1, \ldots, g_m) \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ f, \quad\text{where}\quad f(x_1,\ldots,x_k) = h(g_1(x_1,\ldots,x_k),\ldots,g_m(x_1,\ldots,x_k)).</math> For <math>m=1</math>, the ordinary [[function composition]] <math>h \circ g_1</math> is obtained.
 
| 5=''Primitive recursion operator'' <math>\rho</math>: Given the ''k''-ary function <math>g(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\,</math> and the <math>(''k''&nbsp;+&nbsp;2)</math>-ary function <math>h(y,z,x_1,\ldots,x_k)\,</math>:
:<math display="block">\begin{align}
\rho(g, h) &\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ f, \quad\text{where the }(k+1)\text{-ary function } f \text{ is defined by}\\
f(0y, x_1, \ldotsdots, x_k) &= g(x_1,\ldots,x_k) \\begin{cases}
g(x_1, \dots, x_k) & \text{if } y=0 \\
f(S(y),x_1,\ldots,x_k) &= h(y,f(y,x_1,\ldots,x_k),x_1,\ldots,x_k).\end{align}</math>
h(y', f(y', x_1, \dots, x_k) ,x_1, \dots, x_k) & \text{if } y=S(y') \text{ for a } y' \in \mathbb{N} \\
\end{cases}
\end{align}</math>
''Interpretation:''
The function <math>f</math> acts as a [[for loop|for-loop]] from <math>0</math> up to the value of its first argument. The rest of the arguments for <math>f</math>, denoted here with <math>x_1,\ldots,x_k</math>, are a set of initial conditions for the for-loop which may be used by it during calculations but which are immutable by it. The functions <math>g</math> and <math>h</math> on the right-hand side of the equations that define <math>f</math> represent the body of the loop, which performs calculations. The function <math>g</math> is used only once to perform initial calculations. Calculations for subsequent steps of the loop are performed by <math>h</math>. The first parameter of <math>h</math> is fed the "current" value of the for-loop's index. The second parameter of <math>h</math> is fed the result of the for-loop's previous calculations, from previous steps. The rest of the parameters for <math>h</math> are those immutable initial conditions for the for-loop mentioned earlier. They may be used by <math>h</math> to perform calculations but they will not themselves be altered by <math>h</math>.
Line 34 ⟶ 39:
 
The '''primitive recursive functions''' are the basic functions and those obtained from the basic functions by applying these operations a finite number of times.
 
=== Primitive-recursiveness of vector-valued functions ===
A (vector-valued) function <math>f : \mathbb{N}^m \to \mathbb{N}^n</math> is primitive recursive if it can be written as
:<math>f(x_1, \dots, x_m) = (f_1(x_1, \dots, x_m), \dots, f_n(x_1, \dots, x_m))</math>
where each component <math>f_i : \mathbb{N}^m \to \mathbb{N}</math> is a (scalar-valued) primitive recursive function.<ref>{{harvtxt|PlanetMath}}</ref>
 
== Examples ==
Line 51 ⟶ 61:
|<math>S \circ S</math> is a 1-ary function that adds 2 to its input, <math>(S \circ S)(x) = x+2</math>.
 
|<math>S \circ C_0^1</math> is a 1-ary function which returns 1 for every input: <math>(S \circ C_0^1)(x) = S(C_0^1(x)) = S(0) = 1</math>. That is, <math>S \circ C_0^1</math> and <math>C_1^1</math> are the same function: <math>S \circ C_0^1 = C_1^1</math>. In a similar way, every <math>C_n^k</math> can be expressed as a composition of appropriately many <math>S</math> and <math>C_0^k</math>. Moreover, <math>C_0^k</math> equals <math>C_0^1 \circ P_1^k</math>, since <math>C_0^k(x_1,\ldots,x_k) = 0 = C_0^1(x_1) = C_0^1(P_1^k(x_1,\ldots,x_k)) = (C_0^1 \circ P_1^k)(x_1,\ldots,x_k)</math>. For these reasons, some authors<ref>E.g.: {{cite bookcitation | author=Henk Barendregt | author-link=Henk Barendregt | contribution=Functional Programming and Lambda Calculus | pages=321&ndash;364 | isbn=0-444-88074-7 | editor=Jan van Leeuwen | editor-link=Jan van Leeuwen | title=Formal Models and Semantics | publisher=Elsevier | series=Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science | volume=B | year=1990}} Here: 2.2.6 ''initial functions'', Def.2.2.7 ''primitive recursion'', p.331-332.</ref> define <math>C_n^k</math> only for <math>n = 0</math> and <math>k = 1</math>.
}}
 
Line 107 ⟶ 117:
===Truncated subtraction===
 
The limited subtraction function (also called "[[monus]]", and denoted "<math>\stackrel.mathbin{\dot{-}}</math>") is definable from the predecessor function. It satisfies the equations
:<math>\begin{array}{rcll}
y \stackrel.mathbin{\dot{-}} 0 & = & y & \text{and} \\
y \stackrel.mathbin{\dot{-}} S(x) & = & Pred(y \stackrel.mathbin{\dot{-}} x) & . \\
\end{array}</math>
Since the recursion runs over the second argument, we begin with a primitive recursive definition of the reversed subtraction, <math>RSub(y,x) = x \stackrel.mathbin{\dot{-}} y</math>. Its recursion then runs over the first argument, so its primitive recursive definition can be obtained, similar to addition, as <math>RSub = \rho(P_1^1, Pred \circ P_2^3)</math>. To get rid of the reversed argument order, then define <math>Sub = RSub \circ (P_2^2,P_1^2)</math>. As a computation example,
:<math>\begin{array}{lll}
& Sub(8,1) \\
Line 128 ⟶ 138:
=== Converting predicates to numeric functions ===
 
In some settings it is natural to consider primitive recursive functions that take as inputs tuples that mix numbers with [[truth value]]s (that is <math>t</math> for true and <math>f</math> for false),{{Citation needed|date=January 2025 |reason=Kleene never considers mixed domains - see p. 226 where he lists the 4 types of functions he considers. Using N to represent the naturals, and T to represent the truth values: (a) N to N (b) N to T (c) T oto T (d) T to N}} or that produce truth values as outputs.{{sfn|Kleene|19521974|pp=226–227}} This can be accomplished by identifying the truth values with numbers in any fixed manner. For example, it is common to identify the truth value <math>t</math> with the number <math>1</math> and the truth value <math>f</math> with the number <math>0</math>. Once this identification has been made, the [[indicator function|characteristic function]] of a set <math>A</math>, which always returns <math>1</math> or <math>0</math>, can be viewed as a predicate that tells whether a number is in the set <math>A</math>. Such an identification of predicates with numeric functions will be assumed for the remainder of this article.
 
=== Predicate "Is zero" ===
 
As an example for a primitive recursive predicate, the 1-ary function <math>IsZero</math> shall be defined such that <math>IsZero(x) = 1</math> if <math>x = 0</math>, and
<math>IsZero(x) = 0</math>, otherwise. This can be achieved by defining <math>IsZero = \rho(C_1^0,C_0^2)</math>. Then, <math>IsZero(0) = \rho(C_1^0,C_0^2)(0) = C_1^0(0) = 1</math> and e.g. <math>IsZero(8) = \rho(C_1^0,C_0^2)(S(7)) = C_0^2(7,IsZero(7)) = 0</math>.
 
=== Predicate "Less or equal" ===
 
Using the property <math>x \leq y \iff x \stackrel.mathbin{\dot{-}} y = 0</math>, the 2-ary function <math>Leq</math> can be defined by <math>Leq = IsZero \circ Sub</math>. Then <math>Leq(x,y) = 1</math> if <math>x \leq y</math>, and <math>Leq(x,y) = 0</math>, otherwise. As a computation example,
:<math>\begin{array}{lll}
& Leq(8,3) \\
Line 188 ⟶ 198:
 
=== Some common primitive recursive functions ===
The following examples and definitions are from {{harvtxtharvnb|Kleene|19521974|pp=223–231222–231}}. Many appear with proofs. Most also appear with similar names, either as proofs or as examples, in {{harvtxtharvnb|Boolos|Burgess|Jeffrey|2002|pp=63–70}} they add the logarithm lo(x, y) or lg(x, y) depending on the exact derivation.
 
In the following the mark " ' ", e.g. a', is the primitive mark meaning "the successor of", usually thought of as " +1", e.g. a +1 =<sub>def</sub> a'. The functions 16–20 and #G are of particular interest with respect to converting primitive recursive predicates to, and extracting them from, their "arithmetical" form expressed as [[Gödel number]]s.
Line 271 ⟶ 281:
===Constant functions===
Instead of <math>C_n^k</math>,
alternative definitions use just one 0-ary ''zero function'' <math>C_0^0</math> as a primitive function that always returns zero, and built the constant functions from the zero function, the successor function and the composition operator.{{Citation needed|date=July 2025}}
 
=== Iterative functions ===
Line 289 ⟶ 299:
:<math>\begin{align} f(0) & = 0,\\
f(S(y)) & = h(f(y)), \end{align}</math>
suffices to generate all [[unary operation|unary]] primitive recursive functions if we extend the set of initial functions with truncated subtraction ''x ∸ y''. We get ''all'' primitive recursive functions if we additionally include + as an initial function.
 
=== Additional primitive recursive forms ===
Line 303 ⟶ 313:
An example of a primitive recursive programming language is one that contains basic arithmetic operators (e.g. + and −, or ADD and SUBTRACT), conditionals and comparison (IF-THEN, EQUALS, LESS-THAN), and bounded loops, such as the basic [[for loop]], where there is a known or calculable upper bound to all loops (FOR i FROM 1 TO n, with neither i nor n modifiable by the loop body). No control structures of greater generality, such as [[while loop]]s or IF-THEN plus [[GOTO]], are admitted in a primitive recursive language.
 
The [[LOOP (programming language)|LOOP language]], introduced in a 1967 paper by [[Albert R. Meyer]] and [[Dennis M. Ritchie]],<ref>{{cite conferencecitation
| doi=10.1145/800196.806014
| titlecontribution=The complexity of loop programs
| last1=Meyer
| first1=Albert R.
Line 312 ⟶ 322:
| first2=Dennis M.
| authorlink2=Dennis Ritchie
| conferencetitle=ACM '67: Proceedings of the 1967 22nd national conference
| year=1967
| pages=465–469
| doi-access=free
}}</ref> is such a language. Its computing power coincides with the primitive recursive functions. A variant of the LOOP language is [[Douglas Hofstadter]]'s [[BlooP and FlooP|BlooP]] in ''[[Gödel, Escher, Bach]]''. Adding unbounded loops (WHILE, GOTO) makes the language [[general recursive function|general recursive]] and [[Turing completeness|Turing-complete]], as are all real-world computer programming languages.
Line 330 ⟶ 341:
 
== History ==
[[Recursive definition]]s had been used more or less formally in mathematics before, but the construction of primitive recursion is traced back to [[Richard Dedekind]]'s theorem 126 of his ''Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen?'' (1888). This work was the first to give a proof that a certain recursive construction defines a unique function.<ref name="Smith2013">{{cite bookcitation|author=Peter Smith|title=An Introduction to Gödel's Theorems|year=2013|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-107-02284-3|pages=98–99|edition=2nd |url=https://www.logicmatters.net/igt/}}</ref><ref name="Tourlakis2003">{{cite bookcitation|author=George Tourlakis|title=Lectures in Logic and Set Theory: Volume 1, Mathematical Logic|year=2003|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-139-43942-8|page=129}}</ref><ref name="Downey2014">{{cite bookcitation|editor=Rod Downey|title=Turing's Legacy: Developments from Turing's Ideas in Logic|year=2014|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-107-04348-0|page=474}}</ref>
 
[[Primitive recursive arithmetic]] was first proposed by [[Thoralf Skolem]]<ref>[[Thoralf Skolem]] (1923) "The foundations of elementary arithmetic" in [[Jean van Heijenoort]], translator and ed. (1967) ''From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931''. Harvard Univ. Press: 302-33.</ref> in 1923.
Line 349 ⟶ 360:
 
== References ==
 
* {{cite book|last1=Brainerd |first1=W.S. |last2=Landweber |first2=L.H. |year=1974 |title=Theory of Computation |publisher=Wiley |isbn=0471095850}}
*{{cite book
* {{cite journal | last1=Fischer | first1=Michael J. | last2=Fischer | first2=Robert P. | last3=Beigel | first3=Richard | title=Primitive Recursion without Implicit Predecessor | journal=[[ACM SIGACT|ACM SIGACT News]] |date=November 1989 | volume=20| issue=4| pages=87–91 | url=https://doi.org/10.1145/74074.74089 | doi=10.1145/74074.74089| s2cid=33850327 }}
| last1 = Boolos
* {{cite book|last=Hartmanis |first=Juris |author-link=Juris Hartmanis |year=1989|chapter=Overview of Computational Complexity Theory |title=Computational Complexity Theory |publisher=American Mathematical Society|pp=1-17 |isbn=978-0-8218-0131-4 |series=Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics |volume=38 |mr=1020807}}
| first1 = George
* [[Robert I. Soare]], ''Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees'', Springer-Verlag, 1987. {{isbn|0-387-15299-7}}
| author-link = George Boolos
* {{Cite book |last=Kleene |first=Stephen Cole |author-link=Stephen Cole Kleene |year=1952|title=Introduction to Metamathematics |edition=7th [1974] reprint; 2nd |publisher=[[North-Holland Publishing Company]] |oclc=3757798 |isbn=0444100881}} Chapter XI. General Recursive Functions §57
| last2 = Burgess
*{{citation |author-link=George Boolos |first1=George |last1=Boolos |author2-link=John P. Burgess |first2=John |last2=Burgess |author3-link=Richard Jeffrey |first3=Richard |last3=Jeffrey |title=Computability and Logic |publisher=Cambridge University Press |edition=4th |date=2002 |isbn=9780521007580 |pages=70–71}}
| first2 = John
* Robert I. Soare 1995 ''Computability and Recursion'' http://www.people.cs.uchicago.edu/~soare/History/compute.pdf
| author2-link = John P. Burgess
* Daniel Severin 2008, ''Unary primitive recursive functions'', J. Symbolic Logic Volume 73, Issue 4, pp.&nbsp;1122–1138 [https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0603063v3 arXiv] [https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1230396909 projecteuclid] {{doi|10.2178/jsl/1230396909}} {{JSTOR|275903221}}
| last3 = Jeffrey
| first3 = Richard C.
| author3-link = Richard Jeffrey
| title = Computability and Logic
| publisher = Cambridge University Press
| edition = 4th
| date = 2002
| isbn = 9780521007580
}}
 
*{{cite book
| last1 = Brainerd
| first1 = W.S.
| last2 = Landweber
| first2 = L.H.
| year = 1974
| title = Theory of Computation
| publisher = Wiley
| isbn = 0471095850
}}
 
*{{cite journal
| last = Gladstone
| first = M. D.
| doi = 10.2307/2270177
| journal = [[The Journal of Symbolic Logic]]
| mr = 224460
| pages = 505–508
| title = A reduction of the recursion scheme
| volume = 32
| year = 1967
| issue = 4
| jstor = 2270177
}}
 
*{{cite journal
| last = Gladstone
| first = M. D.
| doi = 10.2307/2272468
| journal = The Journal of Symbolic Logic
| mr = 305993
| pages = 653–665
| title = Simplifications of the recursion scheme
| volume = 36
| year = 1971
| issue = 4
| jstor = 2272468
}}
 
*{{cite book
| last = Hartmanis
| first = Juris
| author-link = Juris Hartmanis
| year = 1989
| chapter = Overview of Computational Complexity Theory
| title = Computational Complexity Theory
| publisher = American Mathematical Society
| pages = 1–17
| isbn = 978-0-8218-0131-4
| series = Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics
| volume = 38
| mr = 1020807
}}
 
*{{cite book
| last = Kleene
| first = Stephen Cole
| author-link = Stephen Cole Kleene
| year = 1974
| orig-year = 1952
| title = Introduction to Metamathematics
| chapter = Chapter XI. General Recursive Functions §57
| edition = 7th reprint; 2nd
| publisher = [[North-Holland Publishing Company]]
| oclc = 3757798
| isbn = 0444100881
}}
 
*{{cite web
| author = PlanetMath
| title = primitive recursive vector-valued function
| url = https://planetmath.org/primitiverecursivevectorvaluedfunction
| access-date = 2025-07-04
}}
 
*{{cite book
| last = Rogers
| first = Hartley Jr.
| title = Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability
| publisher = [[MIT Press]]
| year = 1987
| orig-year = 1967
| edition = Reprint
| isbn = 9780262680523
}}
 
*{{cite journal
| last = Robinson
| first = Raphael M.
| doi = 10.1090/S0002-9904-1947-08911-4
| journal = [[Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society]]
| mr = 22536
| pages = 925–942
| title = Primitive recursive functions
| volume = 53
| year = 1947
| issue = 10
| doi-access = free
}}
 
*{{cite journal
| last = Severin
| first = Daniel E.
| arxiv = cs/0603063
| doi = 10.2178/jsl/1230396909
| issue = 4
| journal = The Journal of Symbolic Logic
| jstor = 275903221
| mr = 2467207
| pages = 1122–1138
| title = Unary primitive recursive functions
| volume = 73
| year = 2008
}}
 
*{{cite book
| last = Soare
| first = Robert I.
| author-link = Robert I. Soare
| isbn = 0-387-15299-7
| title = Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees
| publisher = Springer-Verlag
| year = 1987
}}
 
*{{cite journal
| last = Soare
| first = Robert I.
| author-link = Robert I. Soare
| doi = 10.2307/420992
| volume = 2
| issue = 3
| journal = The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
| mr = 1416870
| pages = 284–321
| title = Computability and recursion
| url = https://scholar.archive.org/work/ruvjr6nkyre4nfxjdme2refpwe
| year = 1996
| jstor = 420992
}}
 
{{Mathematical logic}}