Multiton pattern: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:11, 18 July 2016

Latest revision as of 19:30, 14 August 2025

(22 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Software engineering design pattern}}

[[{{Plain image with caption|Image:Multiton.svg|thumb|right|UML diagram of the multiton]]}}

In [[software engineering]], the '''multiton pattern''' is a [[design pattern (computer science)|design pattern]] similarwhich togeneralizes the [[singleton pattern]]. Whereas the [[singleton pattern | singleton]], which allows only one instance of a class to be created., Thethe multiton pattern expandsallows onfor the singletoncontrolled conceptcreation toof managemultiple instances, which it manages through the use of a [[associative array|map]] of named instances as key-value pairs.

Rather than having a single instance ''per application'' (e.g. the {{Javadoc:SE|package=java.lang|java/lang|Runtime}} object in the [[Java (programming language)|Java programming language]]) the multiton pattern instead ensures a single instance ''per key''.

The multiton pattern does not explicitly appear as a pattern in the highly regarded [[object-oriented programming]] textbook ''[[Design Patterns]]''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=O'Docherty |first1=Mike |title=Object-oriented analysis and design: understanding system development with UML 2.0 |date=2005 |publisher=Wiley |___location=Chichester |isbn=0470092408 |page=341}}</ref> However, the book describes using a '''registry of singletons''' to allow subclassing of singletons,<ref>{{cite book |title=Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software |date=2011 |publisher=Addison-Wesley |___location=Boston, Mass. Munich |isbn=0-201-63361-2 |page=130}}</ref> which is essentially the multiton pattern.{{Citation needed|date=April 2012}}

Most people and textbooks consider this a singleton pattern{{Citation needed|date=April 2012}}. For example, multiton does not explicitly appear in the highly regarded [[object-oriented programming]] textbook ''[[Design Patterns (book)|Design Patterns]]'' (it appears as a more flexible approach named '''registry of singletons''').

== Description ==

While it may appear that the multiton is no more than a simple [[hash table]] with synchronized access there are two important distinctions. First, the multiton does not allow clients to add mappings. Secondly, the multiton never returns a [[wikt:null|null]] or empty reference; instead, it creates and stores a multiton instance on the first request with the associated key. Subsequent requests with the same key return the original instance. A hash table is merely an implementation detail and not the only possible approach. The pattern simplifies retrieval of shared objects in an application.

Since the object pool is created only once, being a member associated with the class (instead of the instance), the multiton retains its flat behavior rather than evolving into a [[Tree (data structure)|tree structure]].

The multiton is unique in that it provides centralized access to a single directory (i.e. all keys are in the same namespace, ''per se'') of multitons, where each multiton instance in the pool may exist having its own [[State (computer science)|state]]. In this manner, the pattern advocates indexed storage of essential objects for the system (such as would be provided by an [[LDAP]] system, for example). However, a multiton is limited to wide use by a single system rather than a myriad of distributed systems.

==Drawbacks==

This pattern, like the [[Singleton pattern]], makes [[unit testing]] far more difficult,<ref>http{{Cite web | url=https://googletesting.blogspot.com/2008/11/clean-code-talks-global-state-and.html |title = Clean Code Talks - Global State and Singletons}}</ref> as it introduces [[global variables|global state]] into an application.

With garbage collected languages it may become a source of memory leaks as it introduces global strong references to the objects.

== Implementations ==

In Java, the multiton pattern can be implemented using an [[enumerated type]], with the values of the type corresponding to the instances. In the case of an enumerated type with a single value, this gives the singleton pattern.

In C#, we can also use enums, as the following example shows:

== References ==

<syntaxhighlight lang="c#" line="1">

using System;

using System.Collections.Generic;

public enum MultitonType

{

Zero,

One,

Two

}

public class Multiton

{

private static readonly Dictionary<MultitonType, Multiton> instances =

new Dictionary<MultitonType, Multiton>();

private MultitonType type;

private Multiton(MultitonType type)

{

this.type = type;

}

public static Multiton GetInstance(MultitonType type)

{

// Lazy init (not thread safe as written)

// Recommend using Double Check Locking if needing thread safety

if (!instances.TryGetValue(type, out var instance))

{

instance = new Multiton(type);

instances.Add(type, instance);

}

return instance;

}

public override string ToString()

{

return $"My type is {this.type}";

}

// Sample usage

public static void Main(string[] args)

{

Multiton m0 = Multiton.GetInstance(MultitonType.Zero);

Multiton m1 = Multiton.GetInstance(MultitonType.One);

Multiton m2 = Multiton.GetInstance(MultitonType.Two);

Console.WriteLine(m0);

Console.WriteLine(m1);

Console.WriteLine(m2);

}

}

</syntaxhighlight>

== References ==

{{Reflist}}

==External links==

* [https://rubygems.org/gems/multiton/versions/0.0.1 Multiton implementation in Ruby language]

* [https://github.com/PureMVC/puremvc-as3-multicore-framework/blob/master/src/org/puremvc/as3/multicore/patterns/facade/Facade.as Multiton usage in PureMVC Framework for ActionScript 3]

* [http://gen5.info/q/2008/07/25/the-multiton-design-pattern/ Article with a C# Multiton implementation, example of use, and discussion of memory issues]

{{Design Patterns patterns}}

<!--Categories-->

[[Category:Software design patterns]]

[[Category:Articles with example Java code]]