Content deleted Content added
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m Add from=Q60977826 to {{Taxonbar}}; WP:TOL cleanup & WP:GenFixes on |
removed Category:Prehistoric placental genera; added Category:Monotypic prehistoric placental genera using HotCat |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Extinct genus of
{{Automatic taxobox
| fossil_range = [[Eocene|Middle Eocene]] <br />~{{fossil range|48.0|40}}
| taxon = Archaeopithecus
| authority = [[Florentino Ameghino|Ameghino]], 1897
| type_species = †'''''Archaeopithecus rogeri'''''
| type_species_authority = [[Florentino Ameghino|Ameghino]], 1897
| subdivision_ranks = Species
Line 19 ⟶ 17:
}}
'''''Archaeopithecus''''' is an [[extinct]] [[genus]] of [[
==Description==
This animal is mostly known from several cranial remains, including an almost complete skull, teeth and mandibles. Comparison with some of its better known relatives allows to portray a small animal, somewhat similar with [[rodent]]s, and weighing less than two kilograms. The snout was higher than in ''[[Notopithecus]]'', with a longer rostrum
''Archaeopithecus'' had conical incisors, similar to its canines, and triangular-shaped upper premolars, devoid of hypocone. The premolars and molars had a strong parastyle and a paracone fold. Unlike other Eocene notoungulates such as ''Notopithecus'' and ''[[Oldfieldthomasia]]'', which had low-crowned teeth, ''Archaeopithecus'' had a near-hypsodont (high-crowned) dentition, with short diastemas between the anterior teeth. The teeth of ''Archaeopithecus'' show an important occlusal variability during growth, associated with a variations caused by wear in the size of the teeth : with the progress of dental wear, the upper molars became wider, while the lower molars became broad and short.
Line 29 ⟶ 27:
==Classification==
The type species, ''Archaeopithecus rongeri'', was first described in 1897 by [[Florentino Ameghino]]. It is known from various fossils discovered in Middle Eocene terrains of [[Argentina]]. More recently, other species of small notoungulates from the same terrains were described, including ''Acropithecus tersus'' and ''Archaeopithecus rigidus''. Several studies tried subsequently to shed light on their taxonomic confusion
''Archaeopithecus'' and ''Acropithecus'' were initially described by Ameghino as primitive [[monkey]]s, hence their name, ''Archaeopithecus'' ("archaic monkey") and ''Acropithecus'' ("highest monkey"), but were later correctly attributed to the order [[Notoungulata]]. There is still doubts over the real relationships of this genus within Notoungulata
==References==
{{Reflist}}
*F. Ameghino. 1897. Mammiféres crétacés de l’Argentine (Deuxième contribution à la connaissance de la fauna mammalogique de couches à Pyrotherium) [Cretaceous mammals of Argentina (second contribution to the knowledge of the mammalian fauna of the Pyrotherium Beds)]. Boletin Instituto Geografico Argentino 18(4–9):406-521
*F. Ameghino. 1904. Nuevas especies de mamíferos, cretáceos y terciarios de la República Argentina [New species of mammals, Cretaceous and Tertiarty, from the Argentine Republic]. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina 56–58:1-142
Line 45 ⟶ 41:
{{Taxonbar|from=Q60977826}}
[[Category:
[[Category:Eocene mammals of South America]]
[[Category:Paleogene Argentina]]
Line 51 ⟶ 47:
[[Category:Taxa named by Florentino Ameghino]]
[[Category:Fossil taxa described in 1897]]
[[Category:
[[Category:Golfo San Jorge Basin]]
[[Category:Sarmiento Formation]]
|