Talk:Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:05, 13 February 2018

Latest revision as of 11:15, 16 August 2025

(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{talkheader}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=

{{WikiProject Computing |class=Start |importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Microsoft Windows |class=Start |importance=MidHigh}}

}}

Line 167:

Can Windows fundamentals be installed alongside WinXP as a separate operating system, available upon boot?

Also, do we have any benchmarks on the relative performance of FLP, compared to XP? It is all well and good claiming to have "cut the bloat" and "slimmed the os down", but shouldn't we have palpable evidence to that effect? What kind of improvement can we expect for system boot-up over XP. Or for typical Office2003 usage? Web surfing, etc? Hasn't anyone benchmarked FLP (on modern and legacy systems alike) to discover whether the hype holds? [[Special:Contributions/84.254.12.174|84.254.12.174]] ([[User talk:84.254.12.174|talk]]) 14:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

:I believe that you can install WinFLP alongside other versions of Windows, although you can only buy it through [[Software Assurance]]. The system requirements are "similar to Windows XP", so I doubt that you'd see a huge performance gain. —&nbsp;'''[[User:Wenli|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#009900;">Wen</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#992222;">li</fontspan>]]'''&nbsp;^{([[User talk:Wenli|reply here]])} 18:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

== Hardware Requirements ==