Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
Jnestorius (talk | contribs) |
||
(35 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Testing conducted on a complete software system}}
{{refimprove|date=January 2013}}▼
{{unbalanced|date=October 2018}}<!-- the emphasis of the prose in the body is on software -->▼
{{see also|System integration testing}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{unbalanced|date=October 2018}}
}}
'''System testing''', a.k.a. '''end-to-end (E2E) testing''', is testing conducted on a complete [[software system]].
System testing often serves the purpose of evaluating the system's compliance with its specified [[requirements]] {{Citation needed|date=April 2008}} {{endash}} often from a [[Functional requirements|functional requirement specification]] (FRS), a [[Requirements analysis|system requirement specification]] (SRS), another type of specification or multiple.
System testing can detect defects in the system as a whole.{{Citation needed|date=April 2008}} <ref>{{Cite web |title=ISTQB Standard glossary of terms used in Software Testing |url=https://glossary.istqb.org/en/search/}}</ref>
System testing can verify the design, the behavior and even the believed expectations of the customer. It is also intended to test up to and beyond the bounds of specified software and hardware requirements.{{Citation needed|date=April 2008}}
==Approaches==
* [[Destructive testing]]: tests are carried out to the specimen's failure, in order to understand a specimen's performance or material behaviour under different loads.
* [[Nondestructive testing]]: analysis techniques to evaluate the properties of a material, component or system without causing damage.
*[[Fault injection]]: A testing technique which stress the system in an unusual way to examine the system behavior.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Moradi|first1=Mehrdad|last2=Van Acker|first2=Bert|last3=Vanherpen|first3=Ken|last4=Denil|first4=Joachim|date=2019|editor-last=Chamberlain|editor-first=Roger|editor2-last=Taha|editor2-first=Walid|editor3-last=Törngren|editor3-first=Martin|chapter=Model-Implemented Hybrid Fault Injection for Simulink (Tool Demonstrations)|title=Cyber Physical Systems. Model-Based Design|series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science|volume=11615|language=en|___location=Cham|publisher=Springer International Publishing|pages=71–90|doi=10.1007/978-3-030-23703-5_4|isbn=978-3-030-23703-5|s2cid=195769468 |chapter-url=https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/Model-Implemented_Hybrid_Fault_Injection_for_Simulink_Tool_Demonstrations_/12479930 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|title=Optimizing fault injection in FMI co-simulation through sensitivity partitioning {{!}} Proceedings of the 2019 Summer Simulation Conference|url=https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/3374138.3374170|access-date=2020-06-15|website=dl.acm.org|date=22 July 2019 |pages=1–12 |language=EN}}</ref><ref>Moradi, Mehrdad, Bentley James Oakes, Mustafa Saraoglu, Andrey Morozov, Klaus Janschek, and Joachim Denil. "Exploring Fault Parameter Space Using Reinforcement Learning-based Fault Injection." (2020).</ref>
===Software testing===▼
==See also==
*[[Automated testing]]▼
*[[Automatic test equipment]]
*[[
*[[Quality control]]▼
*[[Test case (software)|Test case]]
*[[Test fixture]]
*[[Test plan]]
▲*[[Automated testing]]
▲*[[Quality control]]
==Notes==
Line 31 ⟶ 35:
==References==
* {{cite book |last=Black |first=Rex |date=2002 |title=Managing the Testing Process |edition=2nd |publisher=Wiley Publishing |isbn=0-471-22398-0 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/managingtestingp00rexb }}
{{Software testing}}
[[Category:Software testing]]
|