Content deleted Content added
Ekabhishek (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AussieBot 2: Automated C rating |
||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk header|search_term=Devon Ke Dev...Mahadev}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject India|importance=low {{WikiProject Soap Operas
{{WikiProject Television|importance=low
}}
== Major work ==
Line 49 ⟶ 47:
==Restoring references==
Restoring all [[WP:REF|references]] in the article once again after [[User talk:106.212.211.139]] removed them, with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Devon_Ke_Dev...Mahadev&diff=551576170&oldid=550492013 this edit], reverting. Last time in March, I had to revert again after [[User talk:116.203.60.78]] removed all references with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Devon_Ke_Dev...Mahadev&diff=545661785&oldid=544276835 this edit]. What's happening? Without references, the article will get deleted, no matter how popular it is on television. --[[User:Ekabhishek|Ekabhishek]]<sup>[[User talk:Ekabhishek|talk]]</sup> 04:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Sonarika come back <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/115.111.223.43|115.111.223.43]] ([[User talk:115.111.223.43|talk]]) 22:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Missing section that needs ammending ==
{{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}}
<!-- Begin request -->
Following the great success of the series, Mahadev WILL be made into an ENGLISH MOVIE titled Shiva: The Man and the Many! With the technology and graphics and sets that have already been used in Mahadev, it has been seen as worthy enough of an English film!
It has been described that the best portions of the series will be shot again in English for a 3 hour film focusing on simple philosophy that people who do not know of Mahadev or Hinduism could understand
<!-- End request -->
[[Special:Contributions/82.11.184.125|82.11.184.125]] ([[User talk:82.11.184.125|talk]]) 23:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
:If you have any [[WP:Reference|reliable and verifiable references]] to this info, please mention. --[[User:Ekabhishek|Ekabhishek]]<sup>[[User talk:Ekabhishek|talk]]</sup> 07:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> Also, please try not to sound like an obvious [[shill]]. --<small><span style="border:1px solid #000066;padding:1px;">[[User talk:Tow|<span style="color:#000066;"> '''TOW''' </span>]]</span></small> 07:45, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
there is too much of loud music in the serial...we would like to request you to lessen the sound of music so that the dialogues can be easily heard <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/117.220.123.98|117.220.123.98]] ([[User talk:117.220.123.98|talk]]) 16:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Padmavati? ==
I'm trying to resolved the DAB link for Padmavati.
The article says that these actresses: Falaq Naaz / Ragini Rishi / Rubina Dilaik
palyed the parts of:
Goddess Lakshmi / Haripriya / Vedavati / Sita / koRadha / Rukmini / Satyabhama / Padmavati[disambiguation needed]
However, IMDB only shows these actresses only played Lakshmi and Sita. Where is the information that says they played these other characters
As for Padmavati, I'm wondering if maybe this should be [[Padmavathi]] instead?
[[User:Coastside|Coastside]] ([[User talk:Coastside|talk]]) 23:04, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
== Religious or Mythological? ==
An IP address user just changed the genre from mythological to religious. Was there a consensus on whether it should be either of those? What would be the correct term? [[User:BlacknoseDace|BlacknoseDace]] ([[User talk:BlacknoseDace|talk]]) 12:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|BlacknoseDace}} Hi there, I've seen this sort of thing in other TV articles related to Hinduism, where editors fervently wanted to change "mythological" to "historical" because as devotees of Hinduism, they consider it the unassailable history of their world, where ''objectively'', the show uses characters from the Hindu mythology. There is some erroneous perception that "mythology" is pejorative, obviously because in common parlance we call falsehoods "myths". But we don't typically cater to ignorance. The editor who came by to change the wording here said [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Devon_Ke_Dev...Mahadev&diff=959746687&oldid=959694713 Replaced an inappropriate word "mythological" with "religious"]. Well, "mythological" is not inappropriate--it's how most scholars would describe any legend. When I brought this matter up to the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics/Archive_70#Query_about_history_vs_myth Noticeboard for India-related topics] in April, some regulars felt it was normal to describe this sort of thing as mythological. [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/why-mythological-shows-have-been-ruling-indian-television-during-the-lockdown/articleshow/75832699.cms Times of India] considers it a mythological series. Even [https://www.hotstar.com/in/tv/devon-ke-dev--mahadev/s-4 Hotstar], the company that made it, considers it a mythological series. So there is no justification to deviate from that. Regards, [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 14:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
::Thanks for clearing that up. I see the genre has been changed to mythological again, so I suppose this is resolved. [[User:BlacknoseDace|BlacknoseDace]] ([[User talk:BlacknoseDace|talk]]) 22:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
| |||