Solid modeling: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:48, 13 December 2024

Latest revision as of 19:30, 19 August 2025

(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Set of principles for modeling solid geometry}}

{{Technical|date=January 2021}}

{{MOS|article|[[MOS:BBB]]|date=May 2024}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}

Line 19 ⟶ 18:

[[File:Regularize1.png|thumb|right|450px|Regularization of a 2D set by taking the closure of its interior]]

According to the continuum point-set model of solidity, all the points of any ''X'' ⊂ ℝ<supmath>\mathbb{R}^3</supmath> can be classified according to their ''[[Neighborhood (topology)|neighborhoods]]'' with respect to ''X'' as ''[[Interior (topology)|interior]]'', ''[[Exterior (topology)|exterior]]'', or ''[[Boundary (topology)|boundary]]'' points. Assuming ℝ<supmath>\mathbb{R}^3</supmath> is endowed with the typical [[Euclidean metric]], a neighborhood of a point ''p'' ∈''X'' takes the form of an [[Ball (mathematics)|open ball]]. For ''X'' to be considered solid, every neighborhood of any ''p'' ∈''X'' must be consistently three dimensional; points with lower-dimensional neighborhoods indicate a lack of solidity. Dimensional homogeneity of neighborhoods is guaranteed for the class of '''closed regular sets''', defined as sets equal to the ''[[Closure (topology)|closure]]'' of their interior. Any ''X'' ⊂ ℝ<supmath>\mathbb{R}^3</supmath> can be turned into a closed regular set or "regularized" by taking the closure of its interior, and thus the modeling space of solids is mathematically defined to be the space of closed regular subsets of ℝ<supmath>\mathbb{R}^3</supmath> (by the [[Heine–Borel theorem|Heine-Borel theorem]] it is implied that all solids are [[Compact space|compact]] sets). In addition, solids are required to be closed under the Boolean operations of set union, intersection, and difference (to guarantee solidity after material addition and removal). Applying the standard Boolean operations to closed regular sets may not produce a closed regular set, but this problem can be solved by regularizing the result of applying the standard Boolean operations.<ref name = "Regularized operations">{{citation|doi=10.1016/0010-4485(80)90025-1|title=Closure of Boolean operations on geometric entities|journal=Computer-Aided Design|volume=12|issue=5|pages=219–220|year=1980|last1=Tilove|first1=R.B.|last2=Requicha|first2=A.A.G.}}</ref> The regularized set operations are denoted ∪^∗, ∩^∗, and −^∗.

The combinatorial characterization of a set ''X'' ⊂ ℝ<supmath>\mathbb{R}^3</supmath> as a solid involves representing ''X'' as an orientable [[CW complex|cell complex]] so that the cells provide finite spatial addresses for points in an otherwise innumerable continuum.<ref name="Solid Modeling"/> The class of [[semi-analytic]] [[Bounded set|bounded]] subsets of Euclidean space is closed under Boolean operations (standard and regularized) and exhibits the additional property that every semi-analytic set can be [[Stratification (mathematics)|stratified]] into a collection of disjoint cells of dimensions 0,1,2,3. A [[Triangulation (topology)|triangulation]] of a semi-analytic set into a collection of points, [[line segment]]s, triangular [[face (geometry)|faces]], and [[tetrahedral]] elements is an example of a stratification that is commonly used. The combinatorial model of solidity is then summarized by saying that in addition to being semi-analytic bounded subsets, solids are three-dimensional [[topological polyhedra]], specifically three-dimensional orientable manifolds with boundary.<ref name = "Representations">{{cite journal |title= Representations for Rigid Solids: Theory, Methods, and Systems|journal= ACM Computing Surveys|volume= 12|issue= 4|pages= 437–464|author= Requicha, A.A.G. |year= 1980 |doi= 10.1145/356827.356833|s2cid= 207568300}}</ref> In particular this implies the [[Euler characteristic]] of the combinatorial boundary<ref name = "Hatcher">{{cite book |url=httphttps://pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/ATpage.html |title= Algebraic Topology|author= Hatcher, A. |year= 2002 |publisher= Cambridge University Press |access-date=20 April 2010}}</ref> of the polyhedron is 2. The combinatorial manifold model of solidity also guarantees the boundary of a solid separates space into exactly two components as a consequence of the [[Jordan curve theorem|Jordan-Brouwer]] theorem, thus eliminating sets with non-manifold neighborhoods that are deemed impossible to manufacture.

The point-set and combinatorial models of solids are entirely consistent with each other, can be used interchangeably, relying on continuum or combinatorial properties as needed, and can be extended to ''n'' dimensions. The key property that facilitates this consistency is that the class of closed regular subsets of ℝ<supmath>''\mathbb{R}^n''</supmath> coincides precisely with homogeneously ''n''-dimensional topological polyhedra. Therefore, every ''n''-dimensional solid may be unambiguously represented by its boundary and the boundary has the combinatorial structure of an ''n−1''-dimensional polyhedron having homogeneously ''n−1''-dimensional neighborhoods.

==Solid representation schemes==

Line 58 ⟶ 57:

== History of solid modelers ==

{{Unreferenced section|date=January 2012}}

{{AdvertPromotional|section|date=June 2015}}

The historical development of solid modelers has to be seen in context of the whole [[Computer-aided design|history of CAD]], the key milestones being the development of the research system BUILD followed by its commercial spin-off [[Romulus (b-rep solid modeler)|Romulus]] which went on to influence the development of [[Parasolid]], [[ACIS]] and [[Solid Modeling Solutions]]. One of the first CAD developers in the [[Commonwealth of Independent States]] (CIS), ASCON began internal development of its own solid modeler in the 1990s.<ref>{{cite journal

|last = Yares

Line 130 ⟶ 129:

* [[Engineering drawing]]

* Euler [[boundary representation]]

* [[List of CAx companies]]

* [[PLaSM]] – Programming Language of Solid Modeling.

* [[Technical drawing]]