Restricted randomization: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:06, 26 March 2016

Latest revision as of 20:59, 20 August 2025

(17 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{multiple issues|

{{expert-subject|date=March 2012}}

{{more footnotes|date=April 2012}}

}}

In [[statistics]], '''restricted randomization''' occurs in the [[design of experiments]] and in particular in the context of [[randomized experiment]]s and [[randomized controlled trial]]s. Restricted randomization allows intuitively poor allocations of treatments to experimental units to be avoided, while retaining the theoretical benefits of randomization.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Dodge| first1= Y.|title=The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms|publisher=OUP|year=2006|isbn=978-0-19-920613-91|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/oxforddictionary0000unse}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Grundy|first1=P.M.|last2=Healy|first2=M.J.R.|authorlink2author-link2=Michael Healy (statistician)|title=Restricted randomization and quasi-Latin squares|journal=[[Journal of the Royal Statistical Society]], Series B|date=1950 |volume=12|issue=2 |pages=286–291 |doi=10.1111/j.2517-6161.1950.tb00062.x }}</ref> For example, in a [[clinical trial]] of a new proposed treatment of obesity compared to a control, an experimenter would want to avoid outcomes of the randomization in which the new treatment was allocated only to the heaviest patients.

The concept was introduced by [[Frank Yates]] (1948){{full citation needed|date=November 2012}} and [[William J. Youden]] (1972){{full citation needed|date=November 2012}} "as a way of avoiding bad spatial patterns of treatments in designed experiments."<ref name="ref1">Bailey,{{Cite R.journal A.|jstor (1987)= [http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2288775?uid|title =3739808&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21100687318461 "Restricted Randomization: A Practical Example"],|last1 = Bailey|first1 = R. A.|journal = ''Journal of the American Statistical Association'',|year Vol.= 1987|volume = 82,|issue No.= 399|pages (Sep., 1987), pp.= 712–719,|doi at= 71210.1080/01621459.1987.10478487}}</ref>

==Example of nested data==

Line 102 ⟶ 99:

|1

|-

|Error (Wholewhole plot) = Rep* × Conc

|1

|-

Line 108 ⟶ 105:

|1

|-

|Rep* × Temp

|1

|-

Line 114 ⟶ 111:

|1

|-

|Rep* × Current

|1

|-

|Temp* × Conc

|1

|-

|Rep* × Temp* × Conc

|1

|-

|Temp* × Current

|1

|-

|Rep* × Temp* × Current

|1

|-

|Current* × Conc

|1

|-

|Rep* × Current* × Conc

|1

|-

|Temp* × Current* × Conc

|1

|-

|Error (Subplot) = Rep* × Temp* × Current* × Conc

|1

|}

Line 170 ⟶ 167:

|1

|-

|Error (Wholewhole plot) = Conc* × Temp

|1

|-

Line 176 ⟶ 173:

|1

|-

|Conc* × Current

|1

|-

|Temp* × Current

|1

|-

|Conc* × Temp* × Current

|1

|-

|Error (Subplotsubplot)

|8

|}

Line 214 ⟶ 211:

|1

|-

|Error (Wholewhole plot)

|4

|-

Line 220 ⟶ 217:

|1

|-

|Conc* × Current

|1

|-

|Temp* × Current

|1

|-

|Conc* × Temp* × Current

|1

|-

|Error (Subplotsubplot)

|4

|}

Line 254 ⟶ 251:

==See also==

{{portalPortal|StatisticsMathematics}}

* [[Hierarchical linear modeling]]

* [[Mixed-design analysis of variance]]

Line 262 ⟶ 259:

==References==

{{reflist}}

* {{cite web | url=http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pri/section5/pri55.htm | title=How can I account for nested variation (restricted randomization)? | publisher=(U.S.) National Institute of Standards and Technology: Information Technology Laboratory | accessdateaccess-date=March 26, 2012}}

==Further reading==

Line 286 ⟶ 283:

==External links==

* [httphttps://www.southampton.ac.uk/~cpd/anovas/datasets/index.htm Examples of all ANOVA and ANCOVA models with up to three treatment factors, including randomized block, split plot, repeated measures, and Latin squares, and their analysis in R]

{{Statistics}}

Line 295 ⟶ 292:

[[Category:Analysis of variance]]

[[Category:Design of experiments]]

[[Category:Statistical models]]