Talk:Procedural programming: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Raboof (talk | contribs)
an attempt to relate imperative and procedural programming. probably incorrect, but please explain why :)
m Reverted edit by Nkosinat (talk) to last version by Graham87
 
(101 intermediate revisions by 60 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
Why does this article include this tag?
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
This article should be merged with imperative programming.
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Mid |science=y |science-importance=Mid |software=y |software-importance=Mid |early-comp=y |early-comp-importance=Mid}}
[[Procedural programming]] and [[Imperative programming]] are orthogonal concepts, and can be best left on their own. [[User:Bevo|Bevo]] 19:16, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Computer science |importance=mid}}
 
}}
:I've just grabbed a couple of sentences from FOLDOC to explain why. -- [[User:Kowey|Kowey]] 11:06, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
{{User:MiszaBot/config
 
| algo = old(365d)
::The distinction seems to be quite subtle, and could be clearer. I for one don't understand it ;). Could we say that Procedural programming describes a set of rules that are also common `design guidelines' in other paradigms, like for example imperative programming? Obviously breaking up a program in modules and having scoping rules is something common in imperative programming. --[[User:Raboof|Raboof]] 12:22, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
| archive = Talk:Procedural programming/Archive %(counter)d
 
| counter = 1
== procedural programming ==
| maxarchivesize = 100k
| archiveheader = {{aan}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 0
}}