Web Environment Integrity: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:31, 25 August 2023

Latest revision as of 12:14, 22 August 2025

(44 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|ProposedAbandoned API standardproposal by Google}}

{{use mdy dates|date=August 2023}}

'''Web Environment Integrity''' ('''WEI''') is an abandoned [[API]] proposal currentlypreviously beingunder developeddevelopment for [[Google Chrome]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Amadeo |first=Ron |date=2023-08-03 |title=Google's nightmare "Web Integrity API" wants a DRM gatekeeper for the web |url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/07/googles-web-integrity-api-sounds-like-drm-for-the-web/ |access-date=2023-08-03 |website=[[Ars Technica]] |language=en-us}}</ref> {{As of|2023|08|post=,}} aA Web Environment Integrity prototype existsexisted in [[Chromium, (web browser)|Chromium]]<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=[wei] Ensure Origin Trial enables full feature · chromium/chromium@6f47a22 |url=https://github.com/chromium/chromium/commit/6f47a22906b2899412e79a2727355efa9cc8f5bd |access-date=2023-08-19 |website=GitHub |language=en}}</ref> but has not shipped in any browser.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-05-09 |title=Feature: Web environment integrity API |url=https://chromestatus.com/feature/5796524191121408 |url-status=live |access-date=2023-08-23 |website=Chrome Platform Status}}</ref> from May<ref>{{psiCite web |last=Kalla |first=Ryan |title=Add WebEnvironmentIntegrity feature |url=https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4480950 |access-date=August2025-07-30 |website=Chromium Source}}</ref> to November 2023 after extensive criticism by many tech groups.<ref name="abandoned">{{cite web |last1=Claburn |first1=Thomas |date=2023-11-02 |title=Google abandons Web Environment Integrity proposal |url=https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/02/google_abandons_web_environment_integrity/ |access-date=2023-11-10 |website=[[The Register]] |language=en}}</ref> Its purpose was to verify that interactions with websites were human and authentic as defined by third-party attesters.

== Proposal ==

[[ImageFile:Web Environment Integrity attestation - How it works.svg|thumb|480pxupright=2.5|[[Sequence diagram]] showing WEI attestation]]

The draft proposesproposed an API for websites to get a [[Digital signature|digitally- signed]] token that contains the certifier's name and whether or not they deem the web client to be authentic. The stated goal iswas tofor onlysites allowto accessbe able to certainrestrict sitesaccess forto human users instead of automated programs and "allow web servers to evaluate the authenticity of the device and honest representation of the software stack and the traffic from the device". Access to this API willwould not be allowed in non-secure ([[HTTP]]) contexts.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Web-Environment-Integrity/explainer.md at main · RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity |url=https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/blob/main/explainer.md |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=GitHub |language=en}}</ref>

{{clear}}

== History ==

The proposal first showed up as a commit to [[Chromium]] in April before being announced by its developers, Google engineers, in May. It received a few concerned comments from those who followed the browser's rendering engine's development. After discussion at W3C in late April, its working draft specification was published as part of the process to develop standards for the web on July 21, 2023. As a result, users flooded the proposal's [[GitHub]] repository with critical comments and [[Flaming (Internet)|flaming]] of the proposal's authors. As a result, the Google engineers limited comment to those who have contributed to the repository and added a [[code of conduct]].<ref name="register" /> On the same day, Chromium's preliminary code to implement the standard was enabled.<ref name=":1" />

On April 25, 2023, Google engineers, Ben Wiser, Borbala Benko, Philipp Pfeiffenberger and Sergey Kataev created a [[GitHub]] repository explaining the details of the proposal.<ref>{{Citation |last=Wiser |first=Ben |title=Web Environment Integrity API |date=2023-08-18 |url=https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity |access-date=2023-08-19}}</ref> The proposal was [[Flaming (Internet)|flamed]] by GitHub users, with numerous comments, issues and pull requests voicing strong opposition to the existence of the standard and arguing for its deletion.

On November 2, 2023, Google abandoned the proposal, removed the prototype implementation from Chromium, and proposed a replacement API named "Android WebView Media Integrity API" limited to WebViews on Android. Google tested the new API with partners in early 2024.<ref name="abandoned" /> As of late 2024, WebView Media Integrity API is available to all developers.<ref>{{Cite web |title=WebViewMediaIntegrityApiStatusConfig |url=https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/webkit/WebViewMediaIntegrityApiStatusConfig |access-date=2025-07-30 |website=Android Developers |language=en}}</ref>

On July 21st, 2023, Wiser and fellow Google engineer Yoav Weiss added a [[code of conduct]] to the explanation repository<ref>{{Cite web |title=Create CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md · RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity@7998217 |url=https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/commit/7998217b3d7334a71c26c52aeeadc1c6b1ba1dc4 |access-date=2023-08-19 |website=GitHub |language=en}}</ref> and locked it from receiving new comments, issues or pull requests.{{cn|date=August 2023}} On the same day, preliminary code was added to Chromium to implement the standard. This also received a large amount of highly negative comments.<ref name=":1" />

== Reception ==

The proposal hasreceived beenwidespread widely criticizedcriticism for limiting general purpose computing, with some comparing WEI to [[digital rights management]] (DRM).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Amadeo |first=Ron |date=2023-07-24 |title=Google's nightmare "Web Integrity API" wants a DRM gatekeeper for the web |url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/07/googles-web-integrity-api-sounds-like-drm-for-the-web/ |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=[[Ars Technica]] |language=en-us}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Claburn |first=Thomas |title=Google Web Environment Integrity draft draws developer rage |url=https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/25/google_web_environment_integrity/ |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=[[The Register]] |language=en}}</ref> Others have accused the standard of being evidence of Google abusing [[Google Chrome|Chrome's]] near-[[monopoly]] of browser share.<ref name="register">{{Cite web |last=Claburn |first=Thomas |date=2023-07-25 |title=Google's Webnext Environmentbig Integrityidea draftfor drawsbrowser developersecurity ragelooks like another freedom grab to some |url=https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/25/google_web_environment_integrity/ |access-date=2023-08-19 |website=www.theregister.com[[The Register]] |language=en}}</ref> Some have issued official statements on the matter in 2023:

* On July 25, [[Mozilla]] opposed it, stating "Any browser, server, or publisher that implements common standards is automatically part of [[the Web]]{{nbsp}}... Mechanisms that attempt to restrict these choices are harmful to the openness of the Web ecosystem and are not good for users."<ref>{{Cite web |title=Request for Position: Web Environment Integrity API · Issue #852 · mozilla/standards-positions |url=https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/852 |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=GitHub |language=en}}</ref>

Some stakeholders have issued official statements on the matter:

* On July 27, [[Vivaldi Technologies|Vivaldi]] opposed it as "simply dangerous" and feared that attestation providers would not be trustworthy.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-07-25 |title=Unpacking Google's new "dangerous" Web-Environment-Integrity specification |url=https://vivaldi.com/blog/googles-new-dangerous-web-environment-integrity-spec/ |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=Vivaldi Browser |language=en}}</ref>

* On July 2529, the [[MozillaFree Software Foundation|Mozilla]] opposed it, stating itas "contradictsan ourall-out principlesattack on the free Internet" and visionclaimed forit would significantly limit [[the Web]]"browsers that could be used.<ref>{{Cite web |titlefirst=Request for Position:Greg|last=Farough|date=2023-07-28 |title="Web Environment Integrity" APIis ·an Issueall-out #852attack ·on mozilla/standards-positionsthe free Internet |url=https://githubwww.fsf.comorg/mozillablogs/standards-positionscommunity/issues/852web-environment-integrity-is-an-all-out-attack-on-the-free-internet |website=Free Software Foundation |access-date=2023-07-26 |website=GitHub28 |language=en }}</ref>

* On JulyAugust 271, [[VivaldiBrave Technologies(web browser)|VivaldiBrave Software]] opposedannounced itthey aswill "simplynot dangerous"include WEI in their [[web browser]].<ref>{{CiteCitation web|last=Snyder |datefirst=2023-07-25Peter |title=Unpacking"Web Google's newEnvironment Integrity"dangerous": Locking Down the Web |date=2023-Environment08-Integrity specification01 |url=https://vivaldibrave.com/blog/googlesweb-newstandards-dangerousat-brave/9-web-environment-integrity-spec/ |access-date=2023-0708-2629 |websitelanguage=Vivaldi Browseren |languagemode=encs1}}</ref>

* On August 7, the [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]] opposed it as "a bad idea that Google should not pursue" and opposed its proposal of selecting a "small percentage" of random users to simulate behavior without WEI in order to prevent websites from blocking unattested users. The EFF claimed that "[m]any websites will consider that 'small percentage' of users an acceptable price to pay" and feared Google would set the percentage extremely low to combat [[ad fraud]].<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Doctorow |first1=Cory |last2=Hoffman-Andrews |first2=Jacob |date=2023-08-07 |title=Your Computer Should Say What You Tell It To Say |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/08/your-computer-should-say-what-you-tell-it-say-1 |access-date=2023-08-07 |website=www.eff.org}}</ref>

* On July 29, the [[Free Software Foundation]] opposed it as "an all-out attack on the free Internet".<ref>{{Cite web |first=Greg|last=Farough|date=2023-07-28 |title="Web Environment Integrity" is an all-out attack on the free Internet |url=https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/web-environment-integrity-is-an-all-out-attack-on-the-free-internet |website=Free Software Foundation |access-date=2023-07-28 |language=en }}</ref>

* On July 31, [[Brave (web browser)|Brave Software]] opposed it as "junk that Google puts into [[Chromium (web browser)|Chromium]]".<ref>{{Citation |last=Eich |first=Brendan |title=We are a fork, have been all along, the “reskinned” claim is complete nonsense. We won’t be shipping WEI support, just as we disable or otherwise nullify lots of other junk that Google puts into Chromium. |website=[[Twitter]] |url=https://twitter.com/BrendanEich/status/1684561924191842304 |date=2023-07-27 |access-date=2023-08-25 |language=en |mode=cs1}}</ref>

* On August 7, the [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]] opposed it as "a bad idea that Google should not pursue".<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Doctorow |first1=Cory |last2=Hoffman-Andrews |first2=Jacob |date=2023-08-07 |title=Your Computer Should Say What You Tell It To Say |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/08/your-computer-should-say-what-you-tell-it-say-1 |access-date=2023-08-07 |website=www.eff.org}}</ref>

* On August 11, the [[World Wide Web Consortium]] refrained from taking a stance as it was "not being worked on in W3C, nor has there been any submission [for W3C] review".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-08-11|url=https://www.w3.org/blog/2023/web-environment-integrity-has-no-standing-at-w3c/|title=Web Environment Integrity has no standing at W3C; understanding new W3C work|access-date=2023-08-11|website=www.w3.org}}</ref>

Line 33 ⟶ 31:

== External links ==

* {{GitHub|RupertBenWiserexplainers-by-googlers/Web-Environment-Integrity}}

* [https://chromestatus.com/feature/5796524191121408 Web environment integrity API - Chrome Platform Status]