Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: template type, title. Add: url, isbn, pages, date, title, chapter, doi-access, bibcode, arxiv, authors 1-9. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Chris Capoccia | #UCB_toolbar |
→Definition and formulation: codimension is wrong here. |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Machine learning framework}}
'''Neural operators''' are a class of [[deep learning]] architectures designed to learn maps between infinite-dimensional [[function space]]s.
The primary application of neural operators is in learning surrogate maps for the solution operators of [[partial differential equation]]s (PDEs),<ref name="NO journal" /><ref name="NO Nature" /> which are critical tools in modeling the natural environment.<ref name="Evans">{{cite book |author-link=Lawrence C. Evans |first=L. C. |last=Evans |title=Partial Differential Equations |publisher=American Mathematical Society |___location=Providence |year=1998 |isbn=0-8218-0772-2 }}</ref><ref>{{cite press release |title=How AI models are transforming weather forecasting: A showcase of data-driven systems |url=https://phys.org/news/2023-09-ai-weather-showcase-data-driven.html |work=phys.org |publisher=European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts |date=6 September 2023 }}</ref> Standard PDE solvers can be time-consuming and computationally intensive, especially for complex systems. Neural operators have demonstrated improved performance in solving PDEs<ref>{{cite news |last1=Russ |first1=Dan |last2=Abinader |first2=Sacha |title=Microsoft and Accenture partner to tackle methane emissions with AI technology |url=https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-and-accenture-partner-to-tackle-methane-emissions-with-ai-technology/ |work=Microsoft Azure Blog |date=23 August 2023 }}</ref>
== Operator learning ==
Line 14 ⟶ 13:
== Definition and formulation ==
Architecturally, neural operators are similar to feed-forward neural networks in the sense that they are composed of alternating [[linear map]]s and non-linearities. Since neural operators act on and output functions, neural operators have been instead formulated as a sequence of alternating linear [[integral operators]] on function spaces and point-wise non-linearities.
Neural operators seek to approximate some operator <math>\mathcal{G} : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{U}</math> between function spaces <math>\mathcal{A}</math> and <math>\mathcal{U}</math> by building a parametric map <math>\mathcal{G}_\phi : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{U}</math>. Such parametric maps <math>\mathcal{G}_\phi</math> can generally be defined in the form
Line 20 ⟶ 19:
<math>\mathcal{G}_\phi := \mathcal{Q} \circ \sigma(W_T + \mathcal{K}_T + b_T) \circ \cdots \circ \sigma(W_1 + \mathcal{K}_1 + b_1) \circ \mathcal{P},</math>
where <math>\mathcal{P}, \mathcal{Q}</math> are the lifting (lifting the codomain of the input function to a higher dimensional space) and projection (projecting the codomain of the intermediate function to the output
<math>(\mathcal{K}_\phi v_t)(x) := \int_D \kappa_\phi(x, y, v_t(x), v_t(y))v_t(y)dy, </math>
Line 36 ⟶ 35:
The above approximation, along with parametrizing <math>\kappa_\phi</math> as an implicit neural network, results in the graph neural operator (GNO).<ref name="Graph NO">{{cite arXiv |last1=Li |first1=Zongyi |last2=Kovachki |first2=Nikola |last3=Azizzadenesheli |first3=Kamyar |last4=Liu |first4=Burigede |last5=Bhattacharya |first5=Kaushik |last6=Stuart |first6=Andrew |last7=Anima |first7=Anandkumar |title=Neural operator: Graph kernel network for partial differential equations |date=2020 |class=cs.LG |eprint=2003.03485 }}</ref>
There have been various parameterizations of neural operators for different applications.
<math>(\mathcal{K}_\phi v_t)(x) = \mathcal{F}^{-1} (R_\phi \cdot (\mathcal{F}v_t))(x), </math>
Line 47 ⟶ 46:
<math>\mathcal{L}_\mathcal{U}(\{(a_i, u_i)\}_{i=1}^N) := \sum_{i=1}^N \|u_i - \mathcal{G}_\theta (a_i) \|_\mathcal{U}^2</math>,
where <math>\|\cdot \|_\mathcal{U}</math> is a norm on the output function space <math>\mathcal{U}</math>. Neural operators can be trained directly using [[backpropagation]] and [[gradient descent]]-based methods.
Another training paradigm is associated with physics-informed machine learning. In particular, [[physics-informed neural networks]] (PINNs) use complete physics laws to fit neural networks to solutions of PDEs. Extensions of this paradigm to operator learning are broadly called physics-informed neural operators (PINO),<ref name="PINO">{{cite arXiv |last1=Li |first1=Zongyi | last2=Hongkai| first2=Zheng |last3=Kovachki |first3=Nikola | last4=Jin | first4=David | last5=Chen | first5= Haoxuan |last6=Liu |first6=Burigede | last7=Azizzadenesheli |first7=Kamyar |last8=Anima |first8=Anandkumar |title=Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equations |date=2021 |class=cs.LG |eprint=2111.03794 }}</ref> where loss functions can include full physics equations or partial physical laws. As opposed to standard PINNs, the PINO paradigm incorporates a data loss (as defined above) in addition to the physics loss <math>\mathcal{L}_{PDE}(a, \mathcal{G}_\theta (a))</math>. The physics loss <math>\mathcal{L}_{PDE}(a, \mathcal{G}_\theta (a))</math> quantifies how much the predicted solution of <math>\mathcal{G}_\theta (a)</math> violates the PDEs equation for the input <math>a</math>.
== See also ==
* [[Neural network (machine learning)|Neural network]]
* [[Physics-informed neural networks]]
* [[Neural field]]
== References ==
| |||