Progressive stack: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:25, 15 October 2020

Latest revision as of 16:55, 22 August 2025

(40 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{short description|Prioritizing speakers by social group}}

The '''progressive stack''' is a <!--!!READ BEFORE EDITING!!, before changing the article to say progressive stacking is racist, please gain consensus by discussing the issue on the talk page first-->technique used to give [[marginalized groups]] a greater chance to speak.<ref name=penny>{{cite news|last=Penny|first=Laurie|title=Protest Byby Consensusconsensus: Laurie Penny on Madrid's Occupy|url=httphttps://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/laurie-pennypolitics/2011/10/spain-movement-square-world|accessdateaccess-date=11 November 2011|newspaper=[[New Statesman]]|date=16 October 2011}}</ref> It is sometimes an introduction to, or stepping stone to, [[consensus decision-making]] in which simple majorities have less power. The technique works by allowing people to speak on the basis of race, sex, and other group membership, with preference given to members of groups that are considered the most marginalized.

==Overview==

The progressive stack technique attempts to counter what its proponents believe is a flaw in traditional representative democracy, where the majority is heard while the minority or non-dominant groups are silenced or ignored.<ref name=penny/> In practice, "dominant or majority culture"groups may be interpreted by progressive stack practitioners to mean wealthy or [[Whiteupper class]] people, [[white people]], [[men]], [[heterosexual]] or [[cisgender]] people, [[neurotypical]] people, people without physical or mental [[mendisability|disabilities]], and members of majority [[religion]]s, while non-dominant or minority groups include poor or [[womenworking class]], people who are, [[lesbianpeople of color]], [[gaywomen]], [[bisexualsexual and gender minorities]], [[transgenderneurodivergent]] people, people with physical or [[queer]]mental disabilities, [[peoplemembers of color]]minority religions, and very young or older people.<ref>{{cite news|last=Mott|first=Meg|title=Wicca roots|url=http://www.reformer.com/ci_19286528?source=most_viewed|accessdateaccess-date=11 November 2011|newspaper=[[Brattleboro Reformer]]|date=8 November 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Quattrochi |first=Gina |title=When the System Itself is the Problem: Trans women anarchists share Occupy Wall Street message |archiveurlarchive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120109071714/http://anarchistnews.org/node/19566 |archivedatearchive-date=9 January 2012 |url-status=dead |url=httphttps://www.gaycitynews.com/articles/2011/11when-the-system-itself-is-the-problem/09/gay_city_news/news/doc4ebace95a0c26985577656.txt |newspaper=Gay City News |date=November 9, 2011|access-date=February 11, 2022}}</ref>

The "stack" in the [[Occupy movement]] is the list of speakers who are commenting on proposals or asking questions in public meetings. Anyone can request to be added to the stack. In meetings that don't use the progressive stack, people typically speak in the order they were added to the [[queue area|queue]]. In meetings that use the progressive stack, people from non-dominant groups are allowed to speak before people from dominant groups, by [[facilitator]]s, or stack-keepers, urging speakers to "step forward, or step back" based on which racial, age, or gender group they belong to.<ref>{{cite news|last=Seltzer|first=Sarah|title=Where Are the Women at Occupy Wall Street?|url=http://www.truth-out.org/where-are-women-occupy-wall-street/1319895284|accessdateaccess-date=11 November 2011|newspaper=[[The Nation]]|date=29 October 2011}}</ref>

==Criticism==

A. Barton Hinkle, a columnist for the ''[[Richmond Times-Dispatch]]'', has expressed the opinion that "lining up speakers by race and gender might not seem fair on an individual level", and suggests that proponents of the progressive stack care more about class struggle and victimization than individual concerns.<ref>{{cite web|last=Hinkle|first=A. Barton|title=OWS protesters have strange ideas about fairness|url=httphttps://www.timesdispatchrichmond.com/news/ows-protesters-have-strange-ideas-about-fairness/article_9aacde1b-931a-50a6-8471-d40ec1f78eff.html|work=[[Richmond Times-Dispatch]]|publisherdate=Timesdispatch.com4 November 2011 |accessdateaccess-date=25February March11, 20132022}}</ref>

==See also==

*[[Identity politics]]

*[[Intersectionality]]

*[[Reverse racism]]

*[[Oppression Olympics]]

==References==