Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Fixed typo
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Simplify
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Supplement|pages=[[Wikipedia:No original research]]'s [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|Primary, secondary and tertiary sources]] subsection|WP:USEPRIMARY|WP:PRIMARYUSE}}
'''Identifying and using primary sources''' requires careful thought and some extra knowledge on the part of Wikipedia's editors.
 
In determining the type of source, there are three separate, basic characteristics to identify:
 
* Is this source '''self-published''' or not? (If so, then see [[Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published sources]].)
* Is this source '''independent or third-party''', or is it closely affiliated with the subject? (For this question, see [[Wikipedia:Independent sources]].)
* Is this source '''primary''' or not?
 
Every possible combination of these three traits has been seen in sources on Wikipedia. Any combination of these three traits can produce a source that is usable for some purpose in a Wikipedia article. Identifying these characteristics will help you determine how you can use these sources.
 
This page deals primarily with the last question: Identifying and correctly using primary sources.
 
==Background information==
 
Line 79 ⟶ 92:
==="Primary" does not mean "bad"===
{{shortcut|WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD}}
"Primary" is not, and should not be, a bit of jargon used by Wikipedians to mean "bad" or "unreliable" or "unusable". While some primaryPrimary sources arecan not fullybe independent, they can be authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, expert-approved, subject to editorial control, and/or published by a reputable publisher.
 
Primary sources {{em|can}} be [[WP:Identifying reliable sources|reliable]], and they {{em|can}} be used. Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source, such as when you are supporting a direct [[WP:Manual of Style#Quotations|quotation]]. In such cases, the original document is the best source because the original document will be free of any errors or misquotations introduced by subsequent sources.
Line 105 ⟶ 118:
 
==Are news-reporting media secondary or primary sources?==
{{shortcut|WP:PRIMARYNEWS|WP:SECONDARYNEWS}}
The term "news-reporting media" is used here in the sense of actual [[newspaper|newspapers]] and other media reporting news in a manner similar to newspapers.