Comparison of object–relational database management systems: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:36, 20 March 2022

Latest revision as of 16:45, 24 August 2025

(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{short description|None}}

{{Multiple issues|

{{Original research|date=August 2025}}

{{Unreferenced|date=August 2025}}

}}

This is a '''comparison of object–relational database management systems''' (ORDBMSs). Each system has at least some features of an [[object–relational database]]; they vary widely in their completeness and the approaches taken.

Line 89 ⟶ 95:

| GIS for public utilities; can be stored inside Oracle Database

|-

| [[Wakanda (software)|WakandaDB]]

| [[4th Dimension (software)|4th Dimension]]

| [[GNU Affero General Public License|AGPL]]v3 or proprietary

| Windows, Linux, macOS

| Based on REST and server-side JavaScript

Line 132 ⟶ 138:

! style="text-align:left;" | [[Oracle database|Oracle]]

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}<ref group="Note">{{efn|No private methods, no way to call super method from a child.</ref>}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

Line 154 ⟶ 160:

| {{yes}}

|-

! style="text-align:left;" | [[Wakanda (software)|WakandaDB]]

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

Line 208 ⟶ 214:

== See also ==

* [[Comparison of database administration tools]]

* [[Comparison of object database management systems]]

* [[Comparison of relational database management systems]]

Line 214 ⟶ 220:

== Notes ==

{{notelist}}

{{Reflist|group="Note"}}

<!--

== References ==

{{Reflist}}

-->

== External links ==