Comparison of object–relational database management systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{short description|None}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{Original research|date=August 2025}}
{{Unreferenced|date=August 2025}}
}}
This is a '''comparison of object–relational database management systems''' (ORDBMSs). Each system has at least some features of an [[object–relational database]]; they vary widely in their completeness and the approaches taken.
Line 91 ⟶ 95:
| GIS for public utilities; can be stored inside Oracle Database
|-
|
| [[4th Dimension (software)|4th Dimension]]
| [[GNU Affero General Public License|AGPL]]v3 or proprietary
| Windows, Linux, macOS
| Based on REST and server-side JavaScript
Line 134 ⟶ 138:
! style="text-align:left;" | [[Oracle database|Oracle]]
| {{yes}}
| {{yes}}
| {{yes}}
| {{yes}}
Line 156 ⟶ 160:
| {{yes}}
|-
! style="text-align:left;" |
| {{yes}}
| {{yes}}
Line 216 ⟶ 220:
== Notes ==
{{notelist}}
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
== External links ==
|