Cadence Design Systems: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Controversies: creating as section by including the existing material on Lawsuits and adding material on Export Control Violations
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 49:
In January 2025, Cadence announced the acquisition of [[:fr:Secure-IC|Secure-IC]], an embedded security IP platform provider; the acquisition is expected to close by mid-2025, following the usual regulatory approvals and other closing conditions, and be immaterial to 2025 revenue and earnings.<ref>{{cite news |last=Clarke |first=Peter |title=Cadence to acquire French security specialist Secure-IC |url=https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/cadence-to-acquire-french-security-specialist-secure-ic/ |website= eenews |date=2025-01-23 |accessdate=2025-02-02 }}</ref>
 
In mid-2025, the [[Second presidency of Donald Trump|Trump administration]] briefly paused the issuing of licenses for exports of American EDA software to China, including Cadence products.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Swanson |first=Ana |date=2025-05-28 |title=U.S. Pauses Exports of Airplane and Semiconductor Technology to China |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/28/business/economy/jet-engine-chip-software-exports-to-china.html |access-date=2025-05-29 |work=[[The New York Times]] |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Hawkins |first=Mackenzie |date=2025-07-02 |title=US Lifts Chip Design Software Curbs on China in Trade Deal |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-03/siemens-says-us-has-rescinded-chip-software-curbs-on-china |url-access=subscription |access-date=2025-07-03 |publisher=[[Bloomberg News]]}}</ref> In July 2025, it was announced that Cadence would plead guilty to violating U.S. [[export controls]] and pay US$140 million.<ref name="reuters_china">{{Cite news |last=Freifeld |first=Karen |date=2025-07-28 |title=Exclusive: Cadence to plead guilty and pay $140 million to US for China sales |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/china/cadence-plead-guilty-pay-140-million-us-china-sales-2025-07-28/ |access-date=2025-07-30 |work=[[Reuters]] |language=en}}</ref>
 
==Products==
Line 392:
*'''Berkeley Design Automation''' In 2013, Cadence sued Berkeley Design Automation (BDA) for circumvention of a license scheme to link its Analog FastSpice (AFS) simulator to Cadence's Analog Design Environment (Virtuoso ADE).<ref>[https://www.eetimes.com/cadence-sues-berkeley-design-automation Cadence sues Berkeley Design Automation], Dylan McGrath, ''[[EE Times]]'', 15 April 2013</ref> The lawsuit was settled less than one year later with an undisclosed payment of BDA and a multi-year agreement to support interoperability of AFS with ADE through Cadence's official interface. BDA was bought by [[Mentor Graphics]] a few months later.<ref>[https://www.eenewseurope.com/news/mentor-buys-berkeley-da-after-cadence-lawsuit Mentor buys Berkeley DA after Cadence lawsuit], Peter Clarke, eeNews Europe, 24 March 2014</ref>
 
=== Export Controlcontrol Violationsviolations and Chinese Militarymilitary Universityuniversity Salessales ===
In July 2025, Cadence Design Systems agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges and pay over $140 million in combined penalties for illegally exporting semiconductor design technology to China's [[National University of Defense Technology]] (NUDT), a military university controlled by [[China's Central Military Commission|China's Central Military Commission]].<ref>{{cite news|urlname=https:"reuters_china"//www.reuters.com/world/china/cadence-plead-guilty-pay-140-million-us-china-sales-2025-07-28/|title=Cadence to plead guilty and pay $140 million to US for China sales|date=2025-07-28|publisher=Reuters|accessdate=2025-08-24}}</ref> According to the [[U.S. Department of Justice]] and [[Bureau of Industry and Security]], Cadence's Chinese subsidiary knowingly sold Electronic Design Automation (EDA) hardware, software, and semiconductor design technology valued at over $45 million to NUDT between 2015 and 2021, despite the university being placed on the U.S. Entity List in February 2015 due to its use of American technology for supercomputers "believed to support nuclear explosive simulation and military simulation activities."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.rcrwireless.com/20250731/test-and-measurement/cadence-fines|title=Cadence hit with $140.6 million in fines for tech export violations|date=2025-07-30|publisher=RCR Wireless News|accessdate=2025-08-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://govconexec.com/2025/07/cadence-design-settles-illegal-tech-transfer-to-china/|title=Cadence Design Settles Export Violation Charge|date=2025-07-28|publisher=GovCon Executive|accessdate=2025-08-24}}</ref>
 
The violations involved employees at Cadence's Chinese subsidiary using intermediary companies, including Central South CAD Center (CSCC) and later Phytium Technology, to disguise sales to the restricted military university.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/client-alerts/20250806-the-latest-doj-export-control-enforcement-action-highlights-china-risks|title=Latest DOJ Export Control Enforcement Action Highlights China Risks|date=2025-08-05|publisher=WilmerHale|accessdate=2025-08-24}}</ref> Internal communications revealed that Cadence China employees were explicitly instructed to refer to NUDT only in Chinese characters and use "CSCC" in English correspondence because "the subject [was] too sensitive."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.fenwick.com/insights/publications/doj-and-bis-flex-enforcement-priorities-as-u-s-semiconductor-design-company-agrees-to-guilty-plea-and-140m-fine|title=DOJ and BIS Flex Enforcement Priorities as U.S. Semiconductor Design Company Agrees to Guilty Plea and $140M Fine|date=2025-08-13|publisher=Fenwick & West|accessdate=2025-08-24}}</ref> The Department of Justice noted that Cadence received only partial cooperation credit because the company "failed to voluntarily disclose the misconduct" and did not fully facilitate interviews of China-based employees, ultimately resulting in the company being placed on three years of corporate probation.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.crowell.com/en/insights/client-alerts/joint-criminal-and-civil-export-controls-enforcement-lessons-from-the-cadence-case|title=Joint Criminal and Civil Export Controls Enforcement: Lessons from the Cadence Case|date=2025-08-20|publisher=Crowell & Moring|accessdate=2025-08-24}}</ref>