Content deleted Content added
Tuankiet65 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Keyword in the Java programming language}}
{{lowercase title}}
In the [[Java (programming language)|Java programming language]], the <code>'''final'''</code> [[Keyword (computing)|keyword]] is used in several contexts to define an entity that can only be assigned once.
Line 8 ⟶ 9:
Example:
<
public final class
// ...
}
// Forbidden
public class DerivedClass extends FinalClass {
// ...
}
</syntaxhighlight>
==Final methods==
A final [[Method (computer science)|method]] cannot be [[Method overriding|overridden]] or hidden by subclasses.<ref>
Example:
<
public class Base {
public
▲ public final void m2() {...}
public static
public static final void m4() { ... }
}
public class Derived extends Base {
public void
▲ public void m2() {...} // forbidden
public static void m3() { ...
public static void m4() { ...
}
</syntaxhighlight>
A common misconception is that declaring a method as <code>final</code> improves efficiency by allowing the compiler to directly insert the method wherever it is called (see [[inline expansion]]). Because the method is loaded at [[run time (program lifecycle phase)|runtime]], compilers are unable to do this. Only the runtime environment and [[Just-in-time compilation|JIT]] compiler know exactly which classes have been loaded, and so only they are able to make decisions about when to inline, whether or not the method is final.<ref>
Machine code compilers that generate directly executable, platform-specific [[machine code]], are an exception. When using [[static linking]], the compiler can safely assume that methods and variables computable at [[compile-time]] may be inlined.
==Final variables==
A '''final [[Variable (programming)|variable]]''' can only be initialized once, either via an initializer or an assignment statement. It does not need to be initialized at the point of declaration: this is called a "blank final" variable. A blank final [[instance variable]] of a class must be definitely assigned in every constructor of the class in which it is declared; similarly, a blank final static variable must be definitely assigned in a static initializer of the class in which it is declared; otherwise, a compile-time error occurs in both cases.<ref>Java Language Specification #8.3.1.2.</ref> (Note: If the variable is a reference, this means that the variable cannot be re-bound to reference another object. But the object that it references is still [[mutable object|mutable]], if it was originally mutable.)
Unlike the value of a [[constant (computer science)|constant]], the value of a final variable is not necessarily known at compile time. It is considered good practice to represent final constants in all uppercase, using underscore to separate words.<ref>
Example:
<
public class Sphere {
//
public static final double PI = 3.141592653589793;
Line 61 ⟶ 65:
Sphere(double x, double y, double z, double r) {
}
[...]
}
</syntaxhighlight>
Any attempt to reassign <code>radius</code>, <code>xPos</code>, <code>yPos</code>, or <code>zPos</code> will result in a compile error. In fact, even if the constructor doesn't set a final variable, attempting to set it outside the constructor will result in a compilation error.
Line 75 ⟶ 79:
To illustrate that finality doesn't guarantee immutability: suppose we replace the three position variables with a single one:
<
public final Position pos;
</syntaxhighlight>
where <code>pos</code> is an object with three properties <code>pos.x</code>, <code>pos.y</code> and <code>pos.z</code>. Then <code>pos</code> cannot be assigned to, but the three properties can, unless they are final themselves.
Line 85 ⟶ 89:
Though it appears to violate the <code>final</code> principle, the following is a legal statement:
<
for (final SomeObject obj : someList) {
// do something with obj
}
</syntaxhighlight>
Since the obj variable goes out of scope with each iteration of the loop, it is actually redeclared each iteration, allowing the same token (i.e. <code>obj</code>) to be used to represent multiple variables.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~pattis/15-1XX/15-200/lectures/morejava/lecture.html|title=More Java|last=Pattis|first=Richard E.|work=Advanced Programming/Practicum 15–200|publisher=School of Computer Science [[Carnegie Mellon University]]|accessdate=23 July 2010}}</ref>
Line 98 ⟶ 102:
If the above construction is violated by having an object in the tree that is not immutable, the expectation does not hold that anything reachable via the final variable is constant. For example, the following code defines a coordinate system whose origin should always be at (0, 0). The origin is implemented using a <code>java.awt.Point</code> though, and this class defines its fields as public and modifiable. This means that even when reaching the <code>origin</code> object over an access path with only final variables, that object can still be modified, as the below example code demonstrates.
<
import java.awt.Point;
Line 117 ⟶ 121:
}
}
</syntaxhighlight>
The reason for this is that declaring a variable final only means that this variable will point to the same object at any time. The object that the variable points to is not influenced by that final variable though. In the above example, the origin's x and y coordinates can be freely modified.
Line 126 ⟶ 130:
When an anonymous [[inner class]] is defined within the body of a method, all variables declared <code>final</code> in the scope of that method are accessible from within the inner class. For scalar values, once it has been assigned, the value of the <code>final</code> variable cannot change. For object values, the reference cannot change. This allows the Java compiler to "capture" the value of the variable at run-time and store a copy as a field in the inner class. Once the outer method has terminated and its [[call stack|stack frame]] has been removed, the original variable is gone but the inner class's private copy persists in the class's own memory.
<
import javax.swing.*;
Line 147 ⟶ 151:
}
}
</syntaxhighlight>
===Blank final===
The '''blank final''', which was introduced in Java 1.1, is a final variable whose declaration lacks an initializer.<ref>{{cite book|last=Flanagan|first=David|title=Java in a Nutshell|url=https://archive.org/details/javainnutshelld100flan|edition=2nd|date=May 1997|publisher=O'Reilly|isbn=1-56592-262-X|chapter=Chapter 5 Inner Classes and Other New Language Features:5.6 Other New Features of Java 1.1|url-access=registration}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-4.html#jls-4.12.4|title=Chapter 4. Types, Values, and Variables|year=2015|work=The Java® Language Specification (Java SE 8 Edition)|publisher=Oracle America, Inc.|access-date=23 Feb 2015}}</ref> Previous to Java 1.1, a final variable was required to have an initializer. A blank final, by definition of "final", can only be assigned once. i.e. it must be unassigned when an assignment occurs. In order to do this, a Java compiler runs a flow analysis to ensure that, for every assignment to a blank final variable, the variable is definitely unassigned before the assignment; otherwise a compile-time error occurs.<ref name="define_assignment">{{cite web|url=http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/html/jls-16.html|title=Definite Assignment|year=2015|work=The Java® Language Specification (Java SE 8 Edition)|publisher=Oracle America, Inc.|access-date=29 Oct 2016}}</ref>
<
final boolean hasTwoDigits;
if (number >= 10 && number < 100) {
hasTwoDigits = true;
}
if (number > -100 && number <= -10) {
hasTwoDigits = true; // compile-error because the final variable might already be assigned.
}
</syntaxhighlight>
In addition, a blank final also has to be definitely assigned before being accessed.
<
final boolean isEven;
if (number % 2 == 0) {
isEven = true;
}
System.out.println(isEven); // compile-error because the variable was not assigned in the else-case.
</syntaxhighlight>
Note though that a non-final local variable also needs to be definitely assigned before being accessed.
<
boolean isEven; // *not* final
if (number % 2 == 0) {
isEven = true;
}
System.out.println(isEven); // Same compile-error because the non-final variable was not assigned in the else-case.
</syntaxhighlight>
==C/C++ analog of final variables==
{{
In [[C (programming language)|C]] and [[C++]], the analogous construct is the <code>[[const (computer programming)|const]]</code> [[keyword (computer programming)|keyword]]. This differs substantially from <code>final</code> in Java, most basically in being a [[type qualifier]]: <code>const</code> is part of the ''[[data type|type]],'' not only part of the identifier (variable). This also means that the constancy of a value can be changed by casting (explicit type conversion), in this case known as "const casting". Nonetheless, casting away constness and then modifying the object results in [[undefined behavior]] if the object was originally declared <code>const</code>.
Further, because C and C++ expose pointers and references directly, there is a distinction between whether the pointer itself is constant, and whether the data pointed to by the pointer is constant. Applying <code>const</code> to a pointer itself, as in <code>SomeClass
In C++, the <code>final</code> keyword is used to denote that a function cannot be further overridden. It is also used similarly to Java to declare a class as final (cannot be extended).
<syntaxhighlight lang="C++">
// final in a class declaration declares that a class cannot be extended
class Z final : public X, public Y {
public:
// final in a method signature declares that a method cannot be overridden further
void someOperation() override final {
// do something here
}
};
</syntaxhighlight>
==C# analogs for final keyword ==
[[C Sharp (programming language)|C#]] can be considered as similar to Java, in terms of its language features and basic syntax: Java has JVM, C# has .Net Framework; Java has bytecode, C# has MSIL; Java has no pointers (real memory) support, C# is the same.
Regarding the final keyword, C# has two related keywords:
# The equivalent keyword for methods and classes is <code>sealed</code>
# The equivalent keyword for variables is <code>readonly</code> <ref>[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1327544/what-is-the-equivalent-of-javas-final-in-c What is the equivalent of Java's final in C#?]</ref>
Note that a key difference between the C/C++ derived keyword <code>const</code> and the C# keyword <code>readonly</code> is that <code>const</code> is evaluated at compile time, while <code>readonly</code> is evaluated at runtime, and thus can have an expression that is only calculated and fixed later (at runtime).
== See also ==
▲Further, because C and C++ expose pointers and references directly, there is a distinction between whether the pointer itself is constant, and whether the data pointed to by the pointer is constant. Applying <code>const</code> to a pointer itself, as in <code>SomeClass * const ptr</code>, means that the contents being referenced can be modified, but the reference itself cannot (without casting). This usage results in behaviour which mimics the behaviour of a <code>final</code> variable reference in Java. By contrast, when applying const to the referenced data only, as in <code>const SomeClass * ptr</code>, the contents cannot be modified (without casting), but the reference itself can. Both the reference and the contents being referenced can be declared as <code>const</code>.
* [[final (C++)]]
==References==
| |||