Terminal emulator: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:22, 25 June 2025

Latest revision as of 22:38, 25 August 2025

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 21:

[[Workstation]]s, usually running versions of [[Unix]], also became common in the 1980s. Unix systems usually provided access to the [[command line]] with locally-attached or dial-up terminals. Unix workstations were designed to be used primarily through a [[graphical user interface]] (GUI); to provide access to the command line, the GUI included terminal emulator applications that behaved like locally-attached terminals.

During the 1990s, new operating systems like [[Windows]] and [[OS/2]] arrived, providing the technical background for more terminal emulators like [https://winworldpc.com/product/telix/100-for-windows Telix for Windows], [[ZOC (software)|ZOC for OS/2]], or [[PuTTY]], which was initially released for Windows in 1998 and which (together with its derivates) is still oneremains a very popular choice to this day.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.slant.co/topics/1552/~best-terminal-emulators-for-windows |title=SSH Clients for Windows}}</ref>

Through the [[History of Linux|success of Linux]], especially running on data centers and cloud servers,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.debianadmin.com/powering-linux-in-the-data-center.htm|title=Powering Linux in the Data-Center}} {{dead link|date=February 2024}}</ref> the necessity of accessing remote computers through character based terminals remains. This is evident in the fact, that today lists of terminal emulators that could serve as alternative to the aforementioned [[PuTTY]] offers over 100 alternatives.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://alternativeto.net/software/putty/ |title=Alternatives to Putty}}</ref>{{dubious|poor source usage for putty|date=February 2024}}