Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia technical issues and templates: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:01, 27 February 2025

Latest revision as of 01:01, 26 August 2025

(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 2:

{{rfclistintro}}

</noinclude>

'''[[Template talk:TweetTalk header#rfc_A36318Drfc_75DFAF6|Template talk:TweetTalk header]]'''

{{rfcquote|text=

Which of the following [[tooltip]]s should be used on the small list of archives in the {{tl|talk header}} template? [[User:Aaron Liu|<span class="skin-invert" style="color:#0645ad">Aaron Liu</span>]] ([[User talk:Aaron Liu#top|talk]]) 00:57, 26 August 2025 (UTC)}}

For years, tweets have commonly been included in articles using the Tweet template, which allows for the [[Tweet (social media)|tweet]]'s content to be displayed within the article in an easy to digest format. The template allows for the name, handle, and photograph of the tweeter to be included with the quote of their tweet. It provides important context to the quote in an easy to understand format, allowing for people to quickly understand that this was a twitter post, rather than a quote from somewhere else. Twitter is commonly used by celebrities, political figures, and other notable people to disperse information quickly and directly to their followers. Twitter's tweets are unique, short messages, so the source of the post is often relevant information, especially when a tweet has a major enough impact on an entity that the tweet itself is notable enough to end up on a Wikipedia page.

'''[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#rfc_7AE6347|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation]]'''

{{rfcquote|text=

This question is about the terminology to be used when a draft is not accepted but may be reworked or improved and resubmitted. This action is currently referred to in the AFC Helper script and at the messages provided to the author as being '''Declined'''. There has been discussion at the Village Pump at [[Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Declined_vs_rejected_at_AfC]]. Should the terminology for the three possible actions by a reviewer be:

*'''A''' - '''Accepted''', '''Declined''', and '''Rejected'''? (The present options)

*'''B''' - '''Accepted''', '''Not Accepted''', and '''Rejected'''? (The rough consensus at [[WP:VPM|VPM]])

*'''C''' - Something else, please specify.

[[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 18:37, 7 August 2025 (UTC)}}

Their have been some discussions about the relevance [[Template talk:Tweet/Archive 1#Box styling|of]] [[Template talk:Tweet/Archive 1#"Verified" sign doesn't belong in Wikipedia articles|this]] [[Template talk:Tweet/Archive 1#"via Twitter"|template]] [[Template talk:Tweet/Archive 1#Font|in]] [[Template talk:Tweet/Archive 1#Does this template have to have verified badges?|the]] [[Template talk:Tweet/Archive 1#Necessity of a template specifically for a tweet|past]], and an RfD was [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 May 4#Template:Tweet|held]] in May 2024 with a consensus to keep it as it was at the time.

----'''Option A''': Remove all Twitter/X branding from template but keep overall format the same

'''Option B''': Rework template to be like a normal quote

'''Option C''': Keep template with Twitter/X branding restored [[User:Tantomile|Tantomile]] ([[User talk:Tantomile|talk]]) 09:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)}}

'''[[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#rfc_54A0047|Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)]]'''

{{rfcquote|text=

Should bots like Citation bot be allowed to remove redundant 'raw' [[PubMed]] URLs, and raw [[OCLC]] URLs when pmid/oclc identifiers are present. <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 09:25, 17 February 2025 (UTC)}}

{{RFC list footer|tech|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }}