Blossom algorithm: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:22, 30 August 2011

Latest revision as of 17:29, 27 August 2025

(106 intermediate revisions by 64 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{short description|Algorithm for finding max graph matchings}}

'''Edmonds's matching algorithm'''

<ref name = "algorithm">

In [[graph theory]], the '''blossom algorithm''' is an [[algorithm]] for constructing [[maximum matching]]s on [[Graph (discrete mathematics)|graph]]s. The algorithm was developed by [[Jack Edmonds]] in 1961,<ref name = "glimpse">{{Citation

| last = Edmonds

| first = Jack

| contribution = A glimpse of heaven

| year = 1991

| title = History of Mathematical Programming --- A Collection of Personal Reminiscences

| editor = J.K. Lenstra |editor2=A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan |editor3=A. Schrijver

| pages = 32–54

| publisher = CWI, Amsterdam and North-Holland, Amsterdam

}}</ref> and published in 1965.<ref name = "algorithm">

{{cite journal

| doi = 10.4153/CJM-1965-045-4

| author = Edmonds, Jack

| title = Paths, trees, and flowers

| journal = CanadCan. J. Math.

| volume = 17

| year = 1965

| pages = 449&ndash;467449–467

| doi-access = free

}}</ref> Given a general [[Graph (discrete mathematics)|graph]] {{math|1=''G'' = (''V'', ''E'')}}, the algorithm finds a matching {{mvar|M}} such that each vertex in {{mvar|V}} is incident with at most one edge in {{mvar|M}} and {{math|{{abs|''M''}}}} is maximized. The matching is constructed by iteratively improving an initial empty matching along augmenting paths in the graph. Unlike [[bipartite graph|bipartite]] matching, the key new idea is that an odd-length cycle in the graph (blossom) is contracted to a single vertex, with the search continuing iteratively in the contracted graph.

The algorithm runs in time {{math|[[Big O notation|''O'']]({{abs|''E''}}{{abs|''V''}}{{sup|2}})}}, where {{math|{{abs|''E''}}}} is the number of [[edge (graph)|edges]] of the graph and {{math|{{abs|''V''}}}} is its number of [[vertex (graph)|vertices]]. A better running time of <math>O( |E| \sqrt{ |V| } )</math> for the same task can be achieved with the much more complex algorithm of Micali and Vazirani.<ref name = "micali">{{cite conference

| author1 = Micali, Silvio

| author2 = Vazirani, Vijay

| title = An O(V^1/2E) algorithm for finding maximum matching in general graphs

| conference = 21st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

| year = 1980

| publisher = IEEE Computer Society Press, New York

| pages = 17&ndash;27

}}</ref>

is an [[algorithm]] in [[graph theory]] for constructing [[maximum matching]]s on graphs. The algorithm was discovered by [[Jack Edmonds]] in 1965. Given a general [[graph (mathematics)|graph]] ''G'' = (''V'', ''E''), the algorithm finds a matching ''M'' such that each vertex in ''V'' is incident with at most one edge in ''M'' and |''M''| is maximized. The matching is constructed by iteratively improving an initial empty matching along augmenting paths in the graph. To search for augmenting paths, some odd-length cycles in the graph (blossoms) are contracted to single vertices and the search continues recursively in the contracted graphs.

A major reason that the blossom algorithm is important is that it gave the first proof that a maximum-size matching could be found using a polynomial amount of computation time. Another reason is that it led to a [[linear programming]] polyhedral description of the matching [[polytope]], yielding an algorithm for min-''weight'' matching.<ref name = "weighted">

{{cite journal

| author = Edmonds, Jack

| title = Maximum matching and a polyhedron with 0,1-vertices

| journal = Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section B

| volume = 69

| year = 1965

| pages = 125&ndash;130

| doi = 10.6028/jres.069B.013

| doi-access = free

}}</ref>

As elaborated by [[Alexander Schrijver]], further significance of the result comes from the fact that this was the first polytope whose proof of integrality "does not simply follow just from [[total unimodularity]], and its description was a breakthrough in [[polyhedral combinatorics]]."<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783540443896|title=Combinatorial Optimization: Polyhedra and Efficiency|last=Schrijver|first=Alexander|date=2003|publisher=Springer-Verlag|isbn=9783540443896|series=Algorithms and Combinatorics|___location=Berlin Heidelberg|language=en}}</ref>

==Augmenting paths==

Given {{math|1=''G'' = (''V'', ''E'')}} and a matching ''{{mvar|M''}} of ''{{mvar|G''}}, a vertex ''{{mvar|v''}} is '''exposed''', if no edge of ''{{mvar|M''}} is incident with ''{{mvar|v''}}. A path in ''{{mvar|G''}} is an '''alternating path''', if its edges are alternately not in ''{{mvar|M''}} and in ''{{mvar|M''}} (or in ''{{mvar|M''}} and not in ''{{mvar|M''}}). An '''augmenting path''' ''{{mvar|P''}} is an alternating path that starts and ends at two distinct exposed vertices. Note that the number of unmatched edges in an augmenting path is greater by one than the number of matched edges, and hence the total number of edges in an augmenting path is odd. A '''matching augmentation''' along an augmenting path ''{{mvar|P''}} is the operation of replacing ''{{mvar|M''}} with a new matching
:<math>M_1 = M \oplus P = ( M \setminus P ) \cup ( P \setminus M )</math>.

[[ImageFile:Edmonds augmenting path.pngsvg|400px500px|alt=Augmentation along a path]]

By [[Berge's lemma]], matching {{mvar|M}} is maximum if and only if there is no {{mvar|M}}-augmenting path in {{mvar|G}}.<ref name = "matching book">{{cite book

The algorithm uses the following fact:

* Matching ''M'' is not maximum if and only if there exists an ''M''-augmenting path in ''G'',.<ref name = "matching book">{{cite book

| author1 = Lovász, László

| authorlink1 = László Lovász

| author2 = Plummer, Michael | author2-link = Michael D. Plummer

| title = Matching Theory

| publisher = Akadémiai Kiadó

| year = 1986

| isbn = 9630541688963-05-4168-8

}}</ref><ref name = "karp notes">{{citecitation

| author = Karp, Richard

| contribution = Edmonds's Non-Bipartite Matching Algorithm

| title = Course Notes. U. C. Berkeley

| url = http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~karp/greatalgo/lecture05.pdf

| url-status = dead

}}</ref>

| archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20081230183603/http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~karp/greatalgo/lecture05.pdf

| archivedate = 2008-12-30

Here is the high-level algorithm.

}}</ref> Hence, either a matching is maximum, or it can be augmented. Thus, starting from an initial matching, we can compute a maximum matching by augmenting the current matching with augmenting paths as long as we can find them, and return whenever no augmenting paths are left. We can formalize the algorithm as follows:

INPUT: Graph ''G'', initial matching ''M'' on ''G''

OUTPUT: maximum matching ''M*'' on ''G''

A1 '''function''' ''find_maximum_matching''( ''G'', ''M'' ) : ''M*''

A2 ''P'' ← ''find_augmenting_path''( ''G'', ''M'' )

A3 '''if''' ''P'' is non-empty '''then'''

A4 '''return''' ''find_maximum_matching''( ''G'', augment ''M'' along ''P'' )

A5 '''else'''

A6 '''return''' M

A7 '''end if'''

A8 '''end function'''

TheWe subroutinestill have to finddescribe anhow augmenting pathpaths can be found efficiently. The subroutine to find them uses blossoms and contractions.

==Blossoms and contractions==

Given {{math|1=''G'' = (''V'', ''E'')}} and a matching ''{{mvar|M''}} of ''{{mvar|G''}}, a ''[[blossom (graph theory)|blossom]]'' ''{{mvar|B''}} is a cycle in ''{{mvar|G''}} consisting of {{math|2''k''2k + 1''}} edges of which exactly ''{{mvar|k''}} belong to ''{{mvar|M''. We use ''G’''}}, theand '''contractedwhere graph''',one to denoteof the graph obtained from ''G'' by [[edgevertices contraction{{mvar|contracting]] every edgev}} of ''B''. We use ''M’'', the '''contracted matching''', to denotecycle (the corresponding matching of ''G’''. If ''P’base'') is asuch ''M’''-augmentingthat paththere inexists ''G’''an then ''P’'' can be '''lifted''' to a ''M''-augmentingalternating path inof ''G''even by undoinglength (the contraction by ''Bstem'' so that the segment of ''P’'' (if any) traversingfrom through ''{{mvar|v_B''}} is replaced byto an appropriateexposed segmentvertex traversing through ''B''{{mvar|w}}. In more detail:

'''''Finding Blossoms:'''''

<small>

* Traverse the graph starting from an exposed vertex.

* if ''P’'' traverses through a segment ''u → v_B → w'' in ''G’'', then this segment is replaced with the segment ''u → ( u’ → ... → w’ ) → w'' in ''G'', where blossom vertices ''u’'' and ''w’'' and the side of ''B'', ''( u’ → ... → w’ )'', going from ''u’'' to ''w’'' are chosen to ensure that the new path is still alternating (''u’'' is exposed with respect to <math>M \cap B</math>, <math>\{ w', w \} \in E \setminus M</math>).

* Starting from that vertex, label it as an outer vertex {{mvar|'''o'''}}.

</small>

* Alternate the labeling between vertices being inner {{mvar|'''i'''}} and outer {{mvar|'''o'''}} such that no two adjacent vertices have the same label.

* If we end up with two adjacent vertices labeled as outer {{mvar|'''o'''}} then we have an odd-length cycle and hence a blossom.

Define the '''contracted graph''' {{mvar|G'}} as the graph obtained from {{mvar|G}} by [[edge contraction|contracting]] every edge of {{mvar|B}}, and define the '''contracted matching''' {{mvar|M'}} as the matching of {{mvar|G'}} corresponding to {{mvar|M}}.

[[Image:cross blossom path lifting.png|500px|alt=Path lifting when ''P’'' traverses through ''v_B'']]

[[File:Edmonds blossom.svg|500px|alt=Example of a blossom]]

* if ''P’'' has an endpoint ''v_B'', then the path segment ''u → v_B'' in ''G’'' is replaced with the segment ''u → ( u’ → ... → v’ )'' in ''G'', where blossom vertices ''u’'' and ''v’'' and the side of ''B'', ''( u’ → ... → v’ )'', going from ''u’'' to ''v’'' are chosen to ensure that the path is alternating (''v’'' is exposed, <math>\{ u', u \} \in E \setminus M</math>).

{{mvar|G'}} has an {{mvar|M'}}-augmenting path [[if and only if]] {{mvar|G}} has an {{mvar|M}}-augmenting path, and that any {{mvar|M'}}-augmenting path {{mvar|P'}} in {{mvar|G'}} can be '''lifted''' to an {{mvar|M}}-augmenting path in {{mvar|G}} by undoing the contraction by {{mvar|B}} so that the segment of {{mvar|P'}} (if any) traversing through {{mvar|v{{sub|B}}}} is replaced by an appropriate segment traversing through {{mvar|B}}.<ref name = "tarjan notes">{{citation

[[Image:blossom end point path lifting.png|500px|alt=Path lifting when ''P’'' ends at ''v_B'']]

The algorithm uses the following fact (using the notations from above):

* If ''B'' is a blossom, then ''G’'' contains a ''M’''-augmenting path if and only if ''G'' contains a ''M''-augmenting path,.<ref name = "tarjan notes">{{cite

| author = Tarjan, Robert

| contribution = Sketchy Notes on Edmonds' Incredible Shrinking Blossom Algorithm for General Matching

| title = Course Notes, Department of Computer Science, Princeton University

| url = http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~ac/Teach/CS105-Winter05/Handouts/tarjan-blossom.pdf

}}</ref> In more detail:

}}</ref> In addition, ''M’''-augmenting paths in ''G’'' correspond to ''M''-augmenting paths in ''G''.

* if {{mvar|P'}} traverses through a segment {{math|''u'' → ''v{{sub|B}}'' → ''w''}} in {{mvar|G'}}, then this segment is replaced with the segment {{math|''u'' → ( ''u''' → … → ''w' '' ) → ''w''}} in {{mvar|G}}, where blossom vertices {{mvar|u'}} and {{mvar|w'}} and the side of {{mvar|B}}, {{math|( ''u' '' → … → ''w' '' )}}, going from {{mvar|u'}} to {{mvar|w'}} are chosen to ensure that the new path is still alternating ({{mvar|u'}} is exposed with respect to <math>M \cap B</math>, <math>\{ w', w \} \in E \setminus M</math>).

[[File:Edmonds lifting path.svg|500px|alt=Path lifting when {{mvar|P'}} traverses through {{mvar|v{{sub|B}}}}, two cases depending on the direction we need to choose to reach {{mvar|v{{sub|B}}}}]]

* if {{mvar|P'}} has an endpoint {{mvar|v{{sub|B}}}}, then the path segment {{math|''u'' → ''v{{sub|B}}''}} in {{mvar|G'}} is replaced with the segment {{math|''u'' → ( ''u' '' → … → ''v' '' )}} in {{mvar|G}}, where blossom vertices {{mvar|u'}} and {{mvar|v'}} and the side of {{mvar|B}}, {{math|( ''u' '' → … → ''v' '' )}}, going from {{mvar|u'}} to {{mvar|v'}} are chosen to ensure that the path is alternating ({{mvar|v'}} is exposed, <math>\{ u', u \} \in E \setminus M</math>).

[[File:Edmonds lifting end point.svg|500px|alt=Path lifting when {{mvar|P'}} ends at {{mvar|v{{sub|B}}}}, two cases depending on the direction we need to choose to reach {{mvar|v{{sub|B}}}}]]

Thus blossoms can be contracted and search performed in the contracted graphs. This reduction is at the heart of Edmonds's algorithm.

==Finding an augmenting path==

The search for an augmenting path uses an auxiliary data structure consisting of a [[forest (graph theory)|forest]] ''{{mvar|F''}} whose individual trees correspond to specific portions of the graph ''{{mvar|G''}}. UsingIn fact, the structure,forest {{mvar|F}} is the same that would be used to find maximum matchings in [[bipartite graph]]s (without need for shrinking blossoms).
In each iteration the algorithm either (1) finds an augmenting path or, (2) finds a blossom and recurses onto the corresponding contracted graph, or (3) concludes there are no augmenting paths. The auxiliary structure is built by an incremental procedure discussed next,.<ref name = "tarjan notes"/>

The construction procedure considers vertices ''{{mvar|v''}} and edges ''{{mvar|e''}} in ''{{mvar|G''}} and incrementally updates ''{{mvar|F''}} as appropriate. If ''{{mvar|v''}} is in a tree ''{{mvar|T''}} of the forest, we let ''{{code|root(v)}}'' denote the root of ''{{mvar|T''}}. If both ''{{mvar|u''}} and ''{{mvar|v''}} are in the same tree ''{{mvar|T''}} in ''{{mvar|F''}}, we let ''{{code|distance(u,v)}}'' denote the length of the unique path from ''{{mvar|u''}} to ''{{mvar|v''}} in ''{{mvar|T''}}.

INPUT: Graph ''G'', matching ''M'' on ''G''

OUTPUT: augmenting path ''P'' in ''G'' or empty path if none found

B01 '''function''' ''find_augmenting_path''( ''G'', ''M'' ) : ''P''

B02 ''F'' ← empty forest

B03 unmark all vertices and edges in ''G'', mark all edges of ''M''

Line 87 ⟶ 129:

B06 create a singleton tree { ''v'' } and add the tree to ''F''

B07 '''end for'''

B08 '''while''' there is an unmarked vertex ''v'' in ''F'' with ''distance( v, root( v ) )'' even '''do'''

B09 '''while''' there exists an unmarked edge ''e'' = { ''v'', ''w'' } '''do'''

B10 '''if''' ''w'' is not in ''F'' '''then'''

// Update''w'' is matched, so add ''e'' and ''w'''s matched edge to ''F''.

B11 ''x'' ← vertex matched to ''w'' in ''M''

B12 add edges { ''v'', ''w'' } and { ''w'', ''x'' } to the tree of ''v''

B13 '''else'''

B14 '''if''' ''distance( w, root( w ) )'' is odd '''then'''

B15 do // Do nothing.

B16B15 '''else'''

B17B16 '''if''' ''root( v )'' ≠ ''root( w )'' '''then'''

// Report an augmenting path in F <math>\cup</math> { ''e'' }.

B18B17 ''P'' ← path ( ''root''( ''v'' ) → ... → ''v'' ) → ( ''w'' → ... → ''root''( ''w'' ) )

B19B18 '''return''' ''P''

B20B19 '''else'''

// Contract a blossom in ''G'' and look for the path in the contracted graph.

B21B20 ''B'' ← blossom formed by ''e'' and edges on the path ''v'' → ''w'' in ''T''

B22B21 ''G’, M’'' ← contract ''G'' and ''M'' by ''B''

B23B22 ''P’'' ← ''find_augmenting_path''( ''G’'', ''M’'' )

B24B23 ''P'' ← lift ''P’'' to ''G''

B25B24 '''return''' ''P''

B26B25 '''end if'''

B27B26 mark edge ''e'end if'''

B28B27 '''end whileif'''

B29B28 mark vertexedge ''ve''

B30B29 '''end while'''

B30 mark vertex ''v''

B31 '''return''' empty path

B32B31 '''end functionwhile'''

B32 '''return''' empty path

B33 '''end function'''

===Examples===

The following four figures illustrate the execution of the algorithm. Dashed lines indicate edges that are currently not present in the forest. First, the algorithm processes an out-of-forest edge that causes the expansion of the current forest (lines B10 &ndash; B12).

[[File:forest expansion.png|400px|alt=Forest expansion on line B10]]

The following four figures illustrate the execution of the algorithm. We use dashed lines to indicate edges that are currently not present in the forest. First, the algorithm processes an out-of-forest edge that causes the expansion of the current forest (lines B10 &ndash; B12).

Next, it detects a blossom and contracts the graph (lines B20 &ndash; B21).

[[Image:forest expansion.png|400px|alt=Forest expansion on line B10]]

[[File:blossom contraction.png|400px|alt=Blossom contraction on line B21]]

Next, it detects a blossom and contracts the graph (lines B20 &ndash; B22).

Finally, it locates an augmenting path {{mvar|P′}} in the contracted graph (line B22) and lifts it to the original graph (line B23). Note that the ability of the algorithm to contract blossoms is crucial here; the algorithm cannot find {{mvar|P}} in the original graph directly because only out-of-forest edges between vertices at even distances from the roots are considered on line B17 of the algorithm.

[[Image:blossom contraction.png|400px|alt=Blossom contraction on line B21]]

[[File:path detection.png|400px|alt=Detection of augmenting path {{mvar|P′}} in {{mvar|G′}} on line B17]]

Finally, it locates an augmenting path P′ in the contracted graph (line B23) and lifts it to the original graph (line B24). Note that the ability of the algorithm to contract blossoms is crucial here; the algorithm can not find ''P'' in the original graph directly because only out-of-forest edges between vertices at even distances from the roots are considered on line B17 of the algorithm.

[[ImageFile:path detectionlifting.png|400px|alt=DetectionLifting of {{mvar|P′}} to corresponding augmenting path P′ in G′{{mvar|G}} on line B17B25]]

[[Image:path lifting.png|400px|alt=Lifting of P′ to corresponding augmenting path in G on line B25]]

===Analysis===

The forest ''{{mvar|F''}} constructed by the ''{{code|find_augmenting_path()''}} function is an alternating forest,.<ref name = "kenyon report">{{citation

.<ref name = "kenyon report">{{cite

| author1 = Kenyon, Claire

| author2 = Lovász, László

| authorlink2 = László Lovász

| contribution = Algorithmic Discrete Mathematics

| title = Technical Report CS-TR-251-90, Department of Computer Science, Princeton University

}}</ref>

* a tree ''{{mvar|T''}} in ''{{mvar|G''}} is an '''alternating tree''' with respect to ''{{mvar|M''}}, if

** ''{{mvar|T''}} contains exactly one exposed vertex ''{{mvar|r''}} called the tree root

** every vertex at an odd distance from the root has exactly two incident edges in ''{{mvar|T''}}, and

** all paths from ''{{mvar|r''}} to leaves in ''{{mvar|T''}} have even lengths, their odd edges are not in ''{{mvar|M''}} and their even edges are in ''{{mvar|M''}}.

* a forest ''{{mvar|F''}} in ''{{mvar|G''}} is an '''alternating forest''' with respect to ''{{mvar|M''}}, if

** its connected components are alternating trees, and

** every exposed vertex in ''{{mvar|G''}} is a root of an alternating tree in ''{{mvar|F''}}.

Each iteration of the loop starting at line B09 either adds to a tree ''{{mvar|T''}} in ''{{mvar|F''}} (line B10) or finds an augmenting path (line B17) or finds a blossom (line B21B20). It is easy to see that the running time is <math>O( |E||V|^4 2)</math>. Micali and Vazirani <ref name = "micali">{{cite

| author1 = Micali, Silvio

| author2 = Vazirani, Vijay

| title = An O(V^1/2E) algorithm for finding maximum matching in general graphs

| journal = 21st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science,

| year = 1980

| publisher = IEEE Computer Society Press, New York

| pages = 17&ndash;27

}}</ref> show an algorithm that constructs maximum matching in <math>O( |E| |V|^{1 / 2} )</math> time.

===Bipartite matching===

The algorithm reduces to the standard algorithmWhen for matching in bipartite graphs <ref name = "karp notes"/> when ''{{mvar|G''}} is [[bipartite graph|bipartite]]. As, there are no odd cycles in ''{{mvar|G''}}. inIn that case, blossoms will never be found and one can simply remove lines B21B20 &ndash; B29B24 of the algorithm. The algorithm thus reduces to the standard algorithm to construct maximum cardinality matchings in bipartite graphs<ref name = "karp notes"/> where we repeatedly search for an augmenting path by a simple graph traversal: this is for instance the case of the [[Ford–Fulkerson algorithm]].

===Weighted matching===

The matching problem can be generalized by assigning weights to edges in ''{{mvar|G''}} and asking for a set ''{{mvar|M''}} that produces a matching of maximum (minimum) total weight.: Thethis weightedis the [[maximum weight matching]] problem. This problem can be solved by a combinatorial algorithm that uses the unweighted Edmonds's algorithm as a subroutine.<ref name = "matching book"/> Vladimir Kolmogorov provides an efficient C++ implementation of this.<ref name = blossom5>{{citecitation

| author = Kolmogorov, Vladimir

| title = Blossom V: A new implementation of a minimum cost perfect matching algorithm

| url = http://wwwpub.cs.uclist.ac.ukat/staff/V.Kolmogorov~vnk/papers/BLOSSOM5.html

| journal = Mathematical Programming Computation

| volume = 1

Line 174 ⟶ 209:

| pages = 43&ndash;67

| year = 2009

| doi = 10.1007/s12532-009-0002-8

}}</ref>

}}</ref>

==References==

[http://www.stanford.edu/class/cme305/References/pathstrees.pdf Jack Edmond paths, trees and flowers]

<references/>

{{DEFAULTSORT:Edmonds's Matching Algorithm}}

[[Category:Graph algorithms]]

[[Category:Matching (graph theory)]]