Fine-structure constant: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
Undid revision 1308068403 by Papybare (talk): obscure proposals by one guy aren't suitable for inclusion here, even if they technically made it through peer review somewhere (in other words, surviving peer review is the first step, not the last)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 405:
<math display="block">\frac{\ \Delta \alpha\ }{\alpha} ~~ \overset{\underset{\mathsf{~def~}}{}}{=} ~~ \frac{\ \alpha _\mathrm{prev}-\alpha _\mathrm{now}\ }{\alpha_\mathrm{now}} ~~=~~ 0 ~,</math>
or as close to zero as experiment can measure. Any value far away from zero would indicate that {{mvar|α}} does change over time. So far, most experimental data is consistent with {{mvar|α}} being constant, up to 10 digits of accuracy.
 
These experimental results fit into a first-order nonlinear quantum theory that predicts the numerical value of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 5/10000 and therefore leads to the invariance of <math>\alpha</math>.<ref>
{{cite journal
|last1=Reinisch |first1=G. |last2=Gazeau |first2=M.
|date=2016
|title=Role of nonlinearity in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics: Description of linear quantum electrodynamics from the nonlinear Schrödinger-Poisson equation
|journal=[[European Physical Journal Plus]]
|volume=131 |pages=16220
|doi=10.1140/epjp/i2016-16220-6}}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal
|last=Reinisch |first=G.
|year=2024
|title=Quantum-dot helium: An artificial atom with stunning nonlinear properties
|journal=[[Physics Letters A]]
|volume=498 |pages=129347
|doi=10.1016/j.physleta.2024.129347}}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal
|last=Reinisch |first=G.
|year=2024
|title=Mathematical definition of the fine-structure constant: A clue for fundamental couplings in astrophysics
|journal=[[APL Quantum]]
|volume=1 |pages=016111
|doi=10.1063/5.0200259}}</ref>
 
=== Past rate of change ===