Content deleted Content added
TurboSuperA+ (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1298413439 by 103.120.71.249 (talk) not an improvement |
TurboSuperA+ (talk | contribs) unsourced addition, possibly LLM-generated |
||
(26 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 76:
}}
</ref>
===Operating systems===
Line 93 ⟶ 94:
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090926235439/http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/helpandsupport/learnmore/appcompat.mspx
|archive-date=2009-09-26
}}</ref> How much Microsoft developers' access to the company's operating systems' internal APIs is an advantage is unclear. Richard A. Shaffer of ''Technologic Computer Letter'' in 1987 compared the situation to a baseball game in which "Microsoft owns all the bats and the field",<ref name="barney19871102">{{Cite magazine |last=Barney |first=Douglas |date=1987-11-02 |title=Balancing on the high wire of Microsoft's success |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mUSIMiurpfYC&pg=PP81
An API differs from an [[application binary interface]] (ABI) in that an API is source code based while an ABI is [[Binary file|binary]] based. For instance, [[POSIX]] provides APIs while the [[Linux Standard Base]] provides an ABI.<ref>{{cite web|
Line 258 ⟶ 259:
*[[Comparison of application virtual machines]]
*[[Document Object Model]] (DOM)
*
*[[Foreign function interface]]
*[[Front and back ends]]
|