Content deleted Content added
Seercat3160 (talk | contribs) →Semi-protected edit request on 18 August 2025: Edit request not done: It requires reliable sources (Edit Request Tool) |
Day Creature (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 131:
[3] https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/02/google-search-and-ai-content [[User:Microarindam|Microarindam]] ([[User talk:Microarindam|talk]]) 20:03, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
:{{Not done}}''':''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> Your second reference is a dead link, and the other two (from Google) are somewhat promotional, and I would consider them primary sources. Ideally, with reference to more reliable sources, the tone of this can be made less promotional. [[User:Seercat3160|Seercat3160]] ([[User talk:Seercat3160|talk]]) 10:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
== Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2025 ==
{{edit semi-protected|Search engine optimization|answered=yes}}
{{subst:trim|1=
Current:
“Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the quality and quantity of website traffic to a website or a web page from search engines.”
Suggested Revision:
“Search engine optimization (SEO) refers to techniques used to enhance both the quality and volume of traffic to a website or web page through organic search engine results.”
[[User:Billysee|Billysee]] ([[User talk:Billysee|talk]]) 05:27, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
:{{not done}}''':'''<!-- Template:ESp --> No reason given for the proposed change. [[User:Day Creature|Day Creature]] ([[User talk:Day Creature|talk]]) 16:52, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
== Why does 'SEO spam' link to this page, when this page contains absolutely no reference to SEO spam? ==
The page doesn't even contain any indication that SEO has any relevance to spam, or that anybody has ever connected the concepts.
According to the archives, the page used to contain information about the pros and cons, controversies, negative effects and social impacts.
Now all the discussion seems to be about exactly which SEO practices and companies can be promoted more.
Is it really just me that thinks if a practice is so frequently exploited for profit that the world's richest companies have spent decades trying to combat (according to [https://blog.google/products/search/google-search-update-march-2024/ Google], anyway) the Wikipedia page linked to 'SEO spam' ought to contain at least a section on the negative impacts, rather than a vague paragraph on 'black hat SEO' presenting the multi-billion dollar scam industry as a quirky trickster who occasionally changes hats? [[User:Moubliezpas|Moubliezpas]] ([[User talk:Moubliezpas|talk]]) 10:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
| |||