Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:2003 LN6. (BOT) |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussions from User talk:2003 LN6. (BOT) |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 198:
:-@[[User talk:2603:9001:8C00:218C:D117:9F4B:C5ED:E127]]: not reliable per [[WP:RSPYT]]. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #008;padding:1px;background-color:#bff">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#b00">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#0b0">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#00b">6</span>]]</span> 18:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
==[[:Category:Meta-Wiki autoconfirmed users]] has been nominated for discussion==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>[[:Category:Meta-Wiki autoconfirmed users]] has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorization]] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 31#Category:Meta-Wiki autoconfirmed users|the category's entry]]''' on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|categories for discussion]] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 01:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
==DYK for Bangiales==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions/2024/April#6 April 2024|6 April 2024]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Bangiales]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''[[Bangiales]]''', an [[order (biology)|order]] of [[red algae]], contains both [[Bangiomorpha|the oldest-known sexually reproducing organism]] and [[Nori|the seaweed used to make sushi wrappers]]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bangiales]]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2024-03-27&end=2024-04-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bangiales Bangiales])</small>, and the hook may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics/Monthly DYK pageview leaders|the statistics page]] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ♠[[User:Premeditated Chaos|PMC]]♠ [[User_talk:Premeditated Chaos|(talk)]] 12:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for April 6 ==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Genesee, California]], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages [[Genesee]] and [[Geneseo]].
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 18:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
== Rollback ==
[[File:Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg|right|130px]]
Hi 2003 LN6. After reviewing your request, I have <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A2003_LN6 enabled]</span> rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
*Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing [[Wikipedia:Twinkle|Twinkle]] or [[Wikipedia:Ultraviolet|Ultraviolet]]. It just adds a ''[Rollback]'' button next to a page's latest live revision - ''that's all''. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
*Rollback should be used to revert ''clear and unambiguous cases'' of vandalism <ins>only</ins>. ''Never'' use rollback to revert good faith edits.
*Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
*Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, '''''ask!'''''
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback]] (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my [[User talk:Fastily|talk page]] if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! [[User talk:Fastily|<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold;font-variant-caps:small-caps;font-size:120%;">Fastily</span>]] 08:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
== Did you know that you own the fifth largest Wikipedia page, in terms of byte count? ==
[[User:2003 LN6/sandbox/TestPage2]] in the fifth-largest page on the English Wikipedia.<ref>https://xtools.wmcloud.org/largestpages/en.wikipedia.org</ref> [[User:InTheAstronomy32|InTheAstronomy32]] ([[User talk:InTheAstronomy32|talk]]) 18:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
:Interesting. The byte limit can be surpassed? <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #f00;padding:1px;background-color:#800">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#0f0">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#8f8">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 18:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
== Pending changes reviewer granted ==
[[File:Wikipedia Reviewer.svg|right|130px]]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|pending changes reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to [[WP:RPC|review other users' edits]] on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at [[Special:PendingChanges]], while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at [[Special:StablePages]].
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
''See also:''
*[[Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes]], the guideline on reviewing
*[[Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit]], when to accept an edit<!-- Template:Pending changes reviewer granted --> <br>
[[User:Hey man im josh|Hey man im josh]] ([[User talk:Hey man im josh|talk]]) 18:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
== IP block exempt ==
I have granted your account an '''[[Wikipedia:IP block exemption|exemption from IP blocking]]'''. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through [[WP:BLOCK|full blocks]] affecting your [[IP address]] when you are logged in.
Please read the page [[Wikipedia:IP block exemption]] carefully, especially the section on [[WP:IPEXEMPTCONDITIONS|IP block exemption conditions]]. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 18:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)<!-- Template:IP block exemption granted -->
== Nomination of [[:Martialis (disambiguation)]] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Martialis (disambiguation)]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martialis (disambiguation)]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 04:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
:This is a mess, because you tried to "move" a page by copying and pasting, thus losing the history of the cognomen page. Please don't do this. If you want to retitle a page, use "Move": if you can't, then use one of the methods on [[WP:RM]], to get it moved or, if controversial, to start a discussion. Thanks. [[User:PamD|<span style="color: green">'''''Pam'''''</span>]][[User talk:PamD|<span style="color: brown">'''''D'''''</span>]] 12:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
== Typhoon Pamela ==
Hey! As a native speaker of Chinese, could you translate the contents of [https://web.archive.org/web/20160910195832/http://photino.cwb.gov.tw/tyweb/tyfnweb/htm/1954pamela.htm this] site. I'm trying to make a [[Draft:Typhoon Pamela (1954)|draft]] on [[Typhoon Pamela (1954)|1954's Typhoon Pamela]] and this website has info which is needed for what I'm trying to do. [[User:OhHaiMark|OhHaiMark]] ([[User talk:OhHaiMark|talk]]) 18:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:OhHaiMark|OhHaiMark]]: Could you provide the link to your draft and what information do you need? I am a little busy at the moment but I will assist you when possible. I can find that the page states that its peak winds offshore were 120kts, peak winds in Taiwan reached 25m/s, its lowest pressure is 940 millibars, the place where the winds were highest was [[Hengchun]], the most rain recorded was 231.6mm at [[Chenggong, Taitung]], and that the amount of rain ranked 174th among 381 typhoons surveyed by the [[Central Weather Administration]]. The deaths, missing, and injuries columns were blank. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#8ff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#0ff">6</span>]]</span> 04:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
::[[Draft:Typhoon Pamela (1954)|Here]]. [[User:OhHaiMark|OhHaiMark]] ([[User talk:OhHaiMark|talk]]) 12:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
==Concern regarding [[Draft:Optics Valley Suspended Monorail]]==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, 2003 LN6. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that [[Draft:Optics Valley Suspended Monorail]], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months [[WP:G13|may be deleted]], so if you wish to retain the page, please [[Special:EditPage/Draft:Optics Valley Suspended Monorail|edit it]] again or [[WP:USERFY|request]] that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13|request it be undeleted]] so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. [[User:FireflyBot|FireflyBot]] ([[User talk:FireflyBot|talk]]) 19:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
== Speedy deletion nomination of Manniella ==
Hello 2003 LN6,
I'm [[User:Joseywales1961|Joseywales1961]], and I [[WP:NPP|patrol new pages]] here on Wikipedia.
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged a page that you created ([[Manniella]]) for deletion because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at [[WP:G14]].
If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Manniella&subtype=delete|deleting administrator}}.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Joseywales1961<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And, don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks!
<small>Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small><!-- Template:Db-disambig-notice-NPF -->
[[User:Joseywales1961|<span style="color:green">''Josey Wales''</span>]]<sup> [[User talk:Joseywales1961|<span style="color:#0000CD">''Parley''</span>]]</sup> 18:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
:{{Re|Joseywales1961}} I plan to create the other subgenus article soon. It is notable enough for an article. Thank you! <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#8ff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#0ff">6</span>]]</span> 19:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
== "[[:3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456&redirect=no 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 13#3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Renerpho|Renerpho]] ([[User talk:Renerpho|talk]]) 04:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
== Uncited addition to lead section of [[Leafcutter ants]] ==
Hello, I have noticed that you have recently reverted my edits on the page [[leafcutter ant]]. The problem with that page is that it is quite outdated, and needs extensive restructuring after ''[[Amoimyrmex]]'' was designated back in 2020 as a third genus of leafcutter ants. I plan to update the article in the coming days to fit this change. Thank you! Sources: [https://antwiki.org/wiki/Amoimyrmex] [https://antcat.org/catalog/511071]. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#8ff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#0ff">6</span>]]</span> 04:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
: Hi, thanks for discussing. As I wrote just now in my edit comment, which it does not seem that you read, "rv, you can't "update" an article by adding "new" and wholly uncited materials to the lead: it's just a summary of the article. Add what you want to the article body, cited to WP:RS, then (if need be) adjust the lead to match". I'm happy to stand by that. If the article is "outdated", then the place to update it is the article body, not the lead. Your edit immediately reduced the quality of the article in two ways: by making the lead inconsistent with the body, and by introducing an uncited claim. That is, to be clear about it, the wrong direction — worse not better. If you plan to do something, make your plans, find your sources, read [[WP:V]] and [[WP:CITE]] and [[WP:RS]] (core policies all of them), then update the article properly, and everybody will thank you for it. As for your hasty edit, it was correctly reverted, with a correct and fully explanatory edit comment. All the best, [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 04:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] Fixed. Thank you. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#8ff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#0ff">6</span>]]</span> 05:37, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
== {{tl|Talk header}} ==
Re: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ACamponotus_schaefferi&diff=1243568171&oldid=1200579926][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ACamponotus_decipiens&diff=1243697753&oldid=1200579909] and a few others, per [[Template:Talk header#Should this be added to every talk page?]], "{{tq|This template does not need to be placed on every talk page, and should not be indiscriminately added to talk pages.}}" If you do find a page worthy of {{tl|Talk header}}, please place it according to [[Wikipedia:Talk page layout#Lead (bannerspace)]]. <b>~</b> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</span> 22:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
== 1967 Tropical Cyclone Report ==
Hey! Could you translate the Chinese in [https://photino.cwb.gov.tw/rdcweb/lib/cd/cd02tyrp/typ/pdf/Typhoon%20Report1967.pdf this] Tropical Cyclone Report by the [[Central Weather Administration]] and add the info [[User:Tavantius/sandbox3|here]] if you have time? [[User:Tavantius|Tavantius]] ([[User talk:Tavantius|talk]]) 15:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1258243692 -->
==Disambiguation link notification for December 19 ==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Stigmatomma]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Lithomyrmex]].
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 07:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
==DYK for Camponotus inflatus==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions/2025/January#16 January 2025|16 January 2025]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Camponotus inflatus]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that '''[[Camponotus inflatus|a species of Australian ant]]''' has special workers that make honey, and is considered a [[delicacy]] by [[Aboriginal Australians]]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Camponotus inflatus]]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2025-01-06&end=2025-01-26&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Camponotus_inflatus Camponotus inflatus])</small>, and the hook may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics/Monthly DYK pageview leaders|the statistics page]] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 00:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
== JTWC 1 min winds ==
Stop putting 1 min winds without any TC number by JTWC. This is unofficial and illegal. [[User:MAS0802|MAS0802]] 06:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
:Hello @[[User:MAS0802|MAS0802]]: I would like to ask: Why should there be no 1-minute peak sustained winds for non-numbered storms? The track data which is made by the JTWC should be, in my opinion, just as valid a source for determining tropical cyclone 1-minute intensity as it comes from the same agency and is measured in the same way as numbered systems. Therefore, I believe that I should be able to use this as a source to obtain peak 1-minute wind speeds for unnumbered systems. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#fff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 14:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
::Hi [[User:2003 LN6|2003 LN6]]: I hear your feedback about the 1-min peak sustained winds. I'm just want to give you some advice. Firstly, I know unnumbered systems is able to count by JTWC. But the question is, is this unnumbered systems upgraded by JTWC (TD or TS)? Although unnumbered systems is reaching 30 knots or above, you still need waiting the official reports by JTWC, you cannot writing down before JTWC is upgrading the system except another situation. For example, JTWC think this system is transitioned to a STD or STS. That is another situation without any measured by JTWC.
::Secondly, unnumbered systems is still named "Invest", that means it is not yet certain to be upgraded by JTWC. For instance, that is 3 levels of systems, "Low", "Medium" and "High". If this system has a high probability of forming a tropical cyclone. JTWC will issued it a TCFA (Tropical Cyclone Formation Alert). JTWC will determine about this system will become a tropical cyclone or cancel the warning.
::Lastly, you can use any official source to update the system after JTWC official reports is out.
::That's my advice, hope you understand what I mean in this post.
::Have a great day, Bye! [[User:MAS0802|MAS0802]] 17:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
:::@[[User:MAS0802|MAS0802]]: The systems which are never numbered will never be released in post-season analysis tracks. Therefore, the current Invest track data is the only source for 1-minute wind for these unnumbered systems. So, the two possible solutions are either to leave all of them blank or to use the 1-minute winds in the track data as there is no other source I know of for 1-minute winds for these systems, so I prefer providing more information. Also, concerning the system's status, the track data suggests that they are in fact tropical depressions. Thank you! <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#fff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 17:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
::::You can argue that they were tropical depressions because of the tracking data provided by NRL etc but without a formal advisory or designation from the JTWC or the NWS stating such, we enter the territory of original research because of the way the infobox works. [[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 22:59, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::@[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]]: I see why this would be a valid argument, and I will accept this conclusion. Two last things to note; 1. where is the peak intensity found on numbered systems provided by JTWC so that it would not be considered original research?; and 2. Wouldn't comparing numbers from the track data to find the highest wind speed count as [[WP:CALC]]? Just curious. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#fff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 00:24, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::::The point was that on numbered systems, we are not classifying the system as a tropical cyclone or x, but on unnumbered systems, we would be, which is why we enter the realms of OR. Comparing the numbers from the tracking data for numbered systems does indeed fall under WP:Calc, but we can also look at various resources such as the JTWC ATCR's & BT files.[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 00:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
::::::::@[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]]: Thank you! I will discontinue the practice of placing 1-minute winds on unnumbered systems. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#fff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 01:13, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::Yeah this also extends to the addition of systems that have not been publicly classified as tropical depressions by the JTWC or the NWS in Pago Pago. [[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 23:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::@[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]]: There have been three systems in the South Pacific designated as tropical depressions by the JTWC on the track maps, but not by the FMS as disturbances. Can I place them under the other systems section? They are 98P, 90P, and 91P. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#fff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 15:25, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::No because the JTWC have not issued any advisories on these systems or called them Tropical Depressions publicly - you are assuming that they are tropical depressions based on the automated tropical cyclone forecast system which says that they are tropical depressions because they have 25/30 kts winds. Over the years, the rule has been we only mark a system as being a TD or a TS when the JTWC has initiated advisories on it. [[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]] ([[User talk:Jason Rees|talk]]) 01:03, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::@[[User:Jason Rees|Jason Rees]]: I understand the reasoning, and I will not add the three systems in the future. One last point to note: This leads to an interesting scenario where the track maps have TD status while they do not even get a mention on the article. I have not ever witnessed this before, nor do I believe I will encounter it again at least in a few years. Usually, even the weakest systems get a Disturbance and numeric designation by the FMS (e.g. 02F this season which did not even reach TD status on the JTWC track data), but apparently not this one. I believe that WPTC should set up some sort of procedure for this so that confusion and ambiguity does not happen in the future. <span style="border-radius:9pt;border:solid 2px #0f0;padding:1px;background-color:#156">[[User:2003 LN6|<span style="color:#fff">2003</span>]] [[User:2003LN6/t|<span style="color:#fff">LN</span>]][[User:2003LN6/c|<span style="color:#fff">6</span>]]</span> 07:07, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
== Sunil baghel ==
Bag [[Special:Contributions/27.61.235.12|27.61.235.12]] ([[User talk:27.61.235.12|talk]]) 11:08, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
== Baghel sunil ==
Sunil baghel [[Special:Contributions/27.61.235.12|27.61.235.12]] ([[User talk:27.61.235.12|talk]]) 11:09, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
:Really 10-29-2005 [[Special:Contributions/27.61.235.12|27.61.235.12]] ([[User talk:27.61.235.12|talk]]) 11:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
| |||