Remote direct memory access: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:42, 16 August 2018

Revision as of 00:38, 29 August 2025

(33 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Low-level hardware direct memory access}}

In [[computing]], '''remote direct memory access''' ('''RDMA''') is a [[direct memory access]] from the [[main memory|memory]] of one computer into that of another without involving either onecomputer's [[operating system]]. This permits high-throughput, low-[[LatencyNetwork (engineering)latency|latency]] networkingmemory access over a network, which is especially useful in massively parallel [[computer cluster]]s.

== Overview ==

RDMA supports [[zero-copy]] networking by enabling the [[network adapter]] to transfer data from the wire directly to application memory or from application memory directly to the wire, eliminating the need to copy data between application memory and the data buffers in the operating system. Such transfers require no work to be done by [[Central processing unit|CPUs]], [[CPU cache|caches]], or [[context switch]]es, and transfers continue in parallel with other system operations. WhenThis an application performs an RDMA Read or Write request, the application data is delivered directly to the network, reducingreduces latency and enabling fastin message transfer.

However, this strategy presents several problems related to the fact that the target node is not notified of the completion of the request (single-sided communications).

== Acceptance ==

{{As of| 2018|lc=y}} RDMA hashad achieved broader acceptance as a result of implementation enhancements that enable good performance over ordinary networking infrastructure.<ref>RoCE Rocks over Lossy Network: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3098588&dl=ACM&coll=DL</ref> For example RoCE ([[RDMA over Converged Ethernet]] (RoCE) now is able to run over either lossy or lossless infrastructure. In addition [[iWARP]] enables an [[Ethernet]] RDMA implementation at the physical layer using [[Transmission Control Protocol|TCP]]/[[Internet Protocol|IP]] as the transport, combining the performance and latency advantages of RDMA with a low-cost, standards-based solution.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.intel.com/content/dam/support/us/en/documents/network/sb/understanding_iwarp_final.pdf|title=Understanding iWARP|publisher=Intel Corporation|accessdate=16 May 2018}}</ref> The RDMA Consortium and the DAT Collaborative<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.datcollaborative.org/|title=DAT Collaborative website|publisher=|accessdate=14 October 2014|deadurlurl-status=yesdead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150117180600/http://www.datcollaborative.org/|archivedate=17 January 2015|df=}}</ref> have played key roles in the development of RDMA protocols and [[Application programming interface|APIs]] for consideration by standards groups such as the [[Internet Engineering Task Force]] and the Interconnect Software Consortium.<ref>[http://www.opengroup.org/icsc/ The Interconnect Software Consortium website] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050830201232/http://www.opengroup.org/icsc/ |date=2005-08-30 }}</ref>

Hardware vendors have started working on higher-capacity RDMA-based network adapters, with rates of 100&nbsp;Gbit/s reported.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mellanox.com/page/file_storage/|title=Microsoft Based Solutions - Mellanox Technologies|publisher=|accessdate=14 October 2014}}</ref><ref name="chelsio">{{cite web|url=http://www.chelsio.com/chelsio-to-demonstrate-40g-smb-direct-rdma-over-ethernet-for-windows-server-2012/|title=40Gbe SMB Direct RDMA Over Ethernet For Windows Server 2012 - Chelsio Communications|publisherdate=2 April 2013 |accessdate=14 October 2014}}</ref> Software vendors, such as [[IBM]],<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.openfabrics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022-workshop/2022-workshop-presentations/201_RPolig.pdf |title = SOFA-STORAGE: CREATING A VENDOR AGNOSTIC FRAMEWORK TO ENABLE SEAMLESS STORAGE OFFLOAD USING SMARTNICS}}</ref> [[Red Hat]] and [[Oracle Corporation]], support these APIs in their latest products,<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://access.redhat.com/solutions/22188 |title = What RDMA hardware is supported in Red Hat Enterprise Linux?| date=2 June 2016 }}</ref> and {{as of|2013|lc=on}} engineers have started developing network adapters that implement RDMA over Ethernet.<ref>

{{cite web

| url= http://www.chelsio.com/chelsio-to-demonstrate-40g-smb-direct-rdma-over-ethernet-for-windows-server-2012/

Line 19 ⟶ 20:

}}

</ref>

Both [[Red Hat Enterprise Linux]] and [[Red Hat Enterprise MRG]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://investors.redhat.com/news-and-events/press-releases/2011/06-23-2011|title=Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2.0 Now Available|publisher=|accessdate=23 June 2011|deadurlurl-status=yesdead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160825215016/https://investors.redhat.com/news-and-events/press-releases/2011/06-23-2011|archivedate=25 August 2016|df=}}</ref> have support for RDMA. Microsoft supports RDMA in [[Windows Server 2012]] via [[Server Message Block|SMB Direct]]. [[VMware's ESXi product]] also supports RDMA as of 2015.

Common RDMA implementations include the [[Virtual Interface Architecture]], [[RDMA over Converged Ethernet]] (RoCE), [[InfiniBand]], [[Omni-Path]] and, [[iWARP]] and Ultra Ethernet.

== Using RDMA ==

Applications access control structures using well-defined APIs originally designed for the InfiniBand Protocol (although the APIs can be used for any of the underlying RDMA implementations). Using send and completion queues, applications perform RDMA operations by submitting work queue entries (WQEs) into the submission queue (SQ) and getting notified of responses from the completion queue (CQ). <ref>Storm: a fast transactional dataplane for remote data structures: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3319647.3325827</ref>

== Transport types ==

RDMA can transport data reliably or unreliably over the Reliably Connected (RC) and Unreliable Datagram (UD) transport protocols, respectively. The former has the benefit of preserving requests (no requests are lost), while the latter requires fewer queue pairs when handling multiple connections. This is due to the fact that UD is connection-less, allowing a single host to communicate with any other using a single queue.<ref>Storm: a fast transactional dataplane for remote data structures: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3319647.3325827</ref>

== References ==

Line 27 ⟶ 34:

== External links ==

* [http://www.rdmaconsortium.org/home RDMA Consortium]

* {{IETF RFC|5040}}: A Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol Specification

* [http://www.hpcwire.com/2006/09/15/a_tutorial_of_the_rdma_model-1/ A Tutorial of the RDMA Model]

* [https://www.hpcwire.com/2006/10/06/why_compromise-1/ "Why Compromise?"] // HPCwire, Gilad Shainer (Mellanox Technologies), 2006

* [https://web.archive.org/web/20090722111255/http://www.hpcwire.com/features/17888274.html RDMA usage]

* [http://www.hpcwire.com/hpcwire/2006-08-18/a_critique_of_rdma-1.html A Critique of RDMA] for high-performance computing

* [https://www.cs.utah.edu/~stutsman/cs6450/public/papers/rdma.pdf RDMA Reads: To Use or Not to Use?]

* [https://www.openfabrics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022-workshop/2022-workshop-presentations/201_RPolig.pdf]

[[Category:Computer memory]]